State policy and the public research university: A case study of manifest and latent tensions

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 1997, Pages

  Frost, Susan H ^a   Hearn, James C ^a   Marine, Ginger M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031180213     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2960008     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Admissions Task Force, The. (1987). Report of the admissions task force of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2. Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown and Company.
3. Alonso, W., & Starr, P. (1987). The politics of numbers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Banta, T., Rudolph, L. B., Van Dyke, J., & Fisher, H. S. (1996, January/February). Performance funding comes of age in Tennessee. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 23-45.
6. Berdahl, R., & Gove, W. (1982, May/June). Governing higher education: Faculty roles on state boards. Academe, 68, 21-24.
7. Birnbaum, R. (1988). Consistency and diversity in the goals of campus leaders. Review of Higher Education, 12(1), 17-30.
8. Bok, D. C. (1990). Universities and the future of America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Bok, D. C. (1992, July/August). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24(4), 12-19.
10. Breneman, D. W. (1993). Higher education: On a collision course with new realities. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, Occasional Paper, 22.
11. Breneman, D. W. (1995, September 8). Sweeping, painful changes. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(3), pp. B1-B2.
12. Cambanis, T. (1995, February 28) Chancellor in changing times. The Daily Tar Heel, pp. 1, 4-5.
13. Chance, W. (1993). The press and California higher education. A Report from the California Higher Education Policy Center, May 1993: The California Higher Education Policy Center.
14. Chronicle of Higher Education. (1995, February 24). State notes, p. A31.
15. Clarke, L. (1986, December 12). UNC-CH trustees debate policy. Raleigh News and Observer.
16. Cleveland, H. (1985). The knowledge executive: Leadership in an information society. New York: E. P. Dutton.
17. Cloninger, J. (1988, October 5). Administrators weigh merits of out-of-state quotas. The Daily Tar Heel, pp. 1, 7.
18. Cohen, M., & March, J. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity. The American college president. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Cole, J. (1993). Balancing acts: Dilemmas of choice facing research universities. Daedalus, 122(4), 1-36.
20. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Daily Tar Heel, The. (1992, June 11). A 'bull'ish idea in the legislature, p. 8.
22. Dean, Jr., J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter?: A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368-396.
23. Economic Future Study Commission, The. (1991). Fiscal realities for the 90s. Raleigh, NC: Author.
24. Effron, S. (1986, March 15). A&T hit hardest by out-of-state limit. Greensboro (North Carolina) News and Record.
25. Eliot, T. S. (1934). The rock. London: Faber and Faber, Ltd.
26. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Feldman, M., & March, J. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 171-186.
28. Finifter, D. H., Baldwin, R. G., & Thelin, J. R. (1991). The uneasy public policy triangle: Quality, diversity, and budgetary efficiency. New York: ACE-Macmillan.
29. Fisher, J. L. (1988). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Review. McLean VA: J. L. Fisher, Ltd.
30. Geiger, R. L. (1985). Research universities: Their role in undergraduate education. In National Institute of Education, Contexts for Learning: The Major Sectors of American Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
31. General Alumni Association of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (1989). General alumni association task force report.
32. Gilley, J. W. (1991). Thinking about American higher education: The 1990s and beyond. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
33. Gold, S. D. (1995). The fiscal crisis of the states. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
34. Graham, H. D. (1989). Structure and governance in American higher education: Historical and comparative analysis in state policy. Journal of Policy History, 1(1), 80-107.
35. Gumport, P. J. (1993, May/June). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 611-633.
36. Hall, R. (1982). Organizations: Structure and process (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Hardin, P. (1994, October 2). Higher education at the millennium: Celebrations and concerns. Address for the University Day Conversation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
38. Harvey, J., & Immerwahr, J. (1995, Fall). Public perceptions of higher education: On main street and in the boardroom. Educational Record, 76(4), 51-55.
39. Healy, P. (1996, August 9). Activist Republican trustees change the way public universities seek presidents. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(48), pp. A19-20.
40. Hearn, J. C., & Corcoran, M. (1988, November/December). An exploration of the factors behind the proliferation of the institutional research enterprise. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 634-651.
41. Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2) 161-190.
42. Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C. P., & Marine, G. M. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student-aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37(3), 241-278.
43. Jaschik, S. (1987, September 16). North Carolina's highly regarded university system struggles to adapt to life after Bill Friday. Chronicle of Higher Education, 34(3), pp. A23, A30-A31.
44. Jaschik, S. (1989, April 26). Chapel Hill campus struggles with problems of governance: North Carolina's flagship versus the state. Chronicle of Higher Education, 35(33), pp. A17-A18.
45. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46. Kerr, C. (1982). The uses of the university (3rd. ed.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
47. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little-Brown.
48. Little, C. J. (1995). A study of the early effects of the HOPE grant at public colleges and universities in Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
49. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
50. Massey, W. E. (1994). Can the research university adapt to a changing future? In J. R. Cole, E. G. Barber, & S. R. Graubard (Eds.), The research university in a time of discontent (pp. 191-202). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51. McGuinness, A. C. Jr. (1988). State postsecondary education structures handbook: 1988. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
52. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure, 1968 enlarged edition. New York: The Free Press.
53. Metzger, W. P. (1955). Academic freedom in the age of the university. New York: Columbia University Press.
54. North Carolina Memorandum, The. (1986a, February/March). North Carolina college trustees: A profile of our state's higher education leaders, Volume 1, Number 1 of a publication "for the trustees of postsecondary education in North Carolina," from the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation: Winston-Salem, NC.
55. North Carolina Memorandum, The. (1986b, October/November). Unused (wasted?) capacity. Volume 1, Number 5 of a publication "for the trustees of postsecondary education in North Carolina," from the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation, Winston-Salem, NC.
56. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
57. Pettigrew, A. (1973). The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
58. Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
59. Pitts, M. B. (1990). Increase wins backing: Officials support out-of-state enrollment hike. The Daily Tar Heel, p. 1.
60. Prewitt, K. (1993). America's research universities under public scrutiny. Daedalus, 122(4), 85-99.
61. Rhoades, G. (1995). Rethinking restructuring in universities. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(2), 17-30.
62. Rudenstine, N. L. (1996, April 19). Why a diverse student body is so important. Chronicle of Higher Education, 42(32), pp. B1-2.
63. Simsek, H., & Louis, K. S. (1994, November/December). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 670-695.
64. Slaughter, S. (1995). Criteria for restructuring postsecondary education. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(2), 31-44.
65. Stokey, E., & Zeckhauser, R. (1978). A primer for policy analysis. New York: Norton.
66. Student Government Executive Branch. (1994, January 17). A report from the front line: A comprehensive evaluation of the university in its bicentennial year. Chapel Hill: Author.
67. Students for Educational Access. (1990). University at risk: An assessment of the state budget cuts' impact on education and services at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
68. Terenzini, P. T. (1995). Evolution and revolution in institutional research. Keynote address to the annual meeting of the Association for Institutional Research, Boston May 29.
69. Third Century Project, The. (1986). How good are we? Are we good enough?: An overview of collegiate education in North Carolina. Winston-Salem, NC: Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation
70. Third Century Project, The. (1987). Continuing the conversation: Observations and conclusions about postsecondary education in North Carolina. Winston-Salem, NC: Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation
71. Trombley, W. (1993). Public policy by anecdote: The case of community college fees. San Jose, CA: The California Higher Education Policy Center.
72. Trow, M. A. (1983). Organization and leadership in universities: The case of biology at Berkeley. Conference Paper, Swedish National Board of Colleges and Universities. Rosenon, Dalaro, Sweden.
73. Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1988, November/December). Conflict, congruence, and generic university goals. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 611-633.
74. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, The. (1995). All useful learning: Initiating a third century of distinction. An institutional self-study report. Chapel Hill, NC: Author.
75. Wadsworth, D. (1995, June). The new public landscape: Where higher education stands AAHE Bulletin, 14-17.
76. Walker, R. (1995, April 11). Regents to vote on fee changes. Atlanta Constitution, p. C1.
77. Wallsten, P. (1992). Lawmakers balk at out-of-state students. The Daily Tar Heel, 100(40), pp. 1-2.
78. Washington Post, The. (1993, February 21). Close to home: The case for out-of-state students, p. C8.
79. Weathersby, G. B. (1984, January/February). Our fading state colleges: Have they lost their vitality and mission? Change, 16, 18-23.
80. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
81. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.