Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race bias in whites

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 71-84

  Slone, Ashlyn E ^b   Brigham, John C ^a   Meissner, Christian A ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034195398     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_1     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Doubleday.
2. Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 319-341.
3. Anthony, T., Copper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social-cognition integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296-301.
4. Banks, W.M. (1970).The changing attitudes of Black students. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 48, 739-745.
5. Barkowitz, P., & Brigham, J. C. (1982). Recognition of faces: Own-race bias, incentive, and time delay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 255-268.
6. Benton, A. L. (1980). The neuropsychology of facial recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176-186.
7. Benton, A. L., & Trauel, D. (1985). Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 165-213). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identifications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
9. Brigham, J. C. (1989). Disputed eyewitness identifications: Can experts help? The Champion, 8(5), 10-18.
10. Brigham, J. C. (1993). College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933-1967.
11. Brigham, J. C., & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do "they all look alike?" The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306-318.
12. Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding, K. (1982). The accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673-681.
13. Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.
14. Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (1998). Recognition of own-race and other-race caricatures: Implications for models of face recognition. Vision Research, 38, 2455-2468.
15. Carroo, A. W. (1986). Other race recognition: A comparison of Black American and African subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 135-138.
16. Carroo, A. W. (1987). Recognition of faces as a function of race, attitudes, and reported cross-racial friendships. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 319-325.
17. Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1996). The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 153-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1996). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879-894.
19. Cook, S. W. (1970). Motives in a conceptual analysis of attitude-related behavior. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1969 (pp. 199-231). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
20. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
21. Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.
22. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Devine, P. G., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). Orienting strategies in differential face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 33-40.
24. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
25. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 275-277.
26. Dricker, J., Butters, N., Berman, G., Samuels, I., & Carey, S. (1978). The recognition and encoding of faces in alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemispheric patients. Neuropsychologia, 16, 683-695.
27. Dunning, D., Li, J., & Malpass, R. (1998, March). Basketball fandom and cross-race identification among European-Americans: Another look at the contract hypothesis. Paper presented at the American Psychology-Law Society Biennial Conference, Redondo Beach, CA.
28. Feingold, G. A. (1914). The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. Journal of Criminal Law and Police Science, 5, 39-51.
29. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
30. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
31. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1971). Visual recognition of complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 237-241.
32. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1981). Laboratory studies of face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 81-104). London: Academic.
33. Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424-429.
34. Hosch, H. M. (1994). Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 328-347). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hosch, H. M., Bothwell, R. K., Sporer, S. L., & Saucedo, C. (1990). The accuracy of a witness's choice: Facial recognition ability, confidence, decision-time and person descriptions. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at El Paso.
36. Hosie, J. A., & Milne, A. B. (1996). The effect of experimental design on memory for typical and distinctive faces. Memory, 4, 175-197.
37. Howells, T. H. (1938). A study of ability to recognize faces. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 124-127.
38. Huff, R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Jalbert, N. L., & Getting, J. (1992). Racial and gender issues in facial recognition. In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 309-316). Berlin: deGruyter.
40. Kassin, S. M., Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, V. L. (1989). The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.
41. Lavrakas, P. J., Buri, J. R., & Mayzner, M. S. (1976). A perspective on the recognition of other race. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 475-481.
42. Leippe, M. R. (1995). The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 909-959.
43. Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.
44. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Malpass, R. S. (1990). An excursion into utilitatian analyses, with side trips. Behavioral Science Research, 24, 1-15.
46. Malpass, R. S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition for faces of own- and other-race faces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 330-334.
47. Mason, S. E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification. Experimental Aging Research, 12, 151-154.
48. Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday.
49. Ng, W., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1994). Cross-race facial recognition: Failure of the contact hypothesis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 217-232.
50. Osterrieth, P. A. (1944). Le test du copie d'une figure complexe [Test of copying a complex figure]. Archives of Psychology, 28, 206-356.
51. O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208-224.
52. Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 972-984.
53. Rey, A. (1942). L'examen psychologique dans tes d'encephalopathic traumatique [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives of Psychology, 28, 286-340.
54. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., Taylor, K., & Tan, S. (1989). Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 313-331.
55. Ross, D. F., Read, J. D., & Toglia, M. P. (Eds.). (1994). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
57. Shepherd, J. W. (1981). Social factors in face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 55-79). London: Academic.
58. Shepherd, J. W., Deregowski, J. B., & Ellis, H. D. (1974). A cross cultural study of recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 205-211.
59. Sporer, S. L. (1991). Deep-deeper-deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 323-333.
60. Sporer, S. L., Malpass, R. S., & Koehnken, G. (1996). Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
61. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
62. Swope, T. (1994). Social experience, illusory correlation, and facial recognition ability. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University.
63. Taylor, E. M. (1959). Psychological appraisal of children with cerebral defects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
65. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race on face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
66. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
67. Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.
68. Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1967). An experimental investigation of facial recognition with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex, 3, 317-326.
69. Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (Eds.). (1984). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
70. Whipple, G. M. (1909). The observer as reporter: A survey of the psychology of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 153-170.
71. Whipple, G. M. (1912). Psychology of testimony and report. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 221-224.
72. Whipple, G. M. (1918). The obtaining of information: Psychology of observation and report. Psychological Bulletin, 15, 217-248.
73. Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press.
74. Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 13-40). Chichester, England: Wiley.