Coding in taste receptor cells: The early years of intracellular recordings

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 17-27

  Herness, Scott ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gustation; Intracellular recordings; Receptor potential; Sensory transduction

Indexed keywords

ION CHANNEL; QUININE;

ADAPTATION; INTRACELLULAR RECORDING; MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR POTENTIAL; REVIEW; SENSORY NERVE; STIMULUS; TASTE BUD; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0034177722     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00186-4     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akaike N., Noma A., Sato M. Frog taste cell response to chemical stimuli. Proc Jpn Acad. 49:1973;464-469.
2. Akaike N., Noma A., Sato M. Electrical responses of frog taste cells to chemical stimuli. J Physiol. 254:1976;87-107.
3. Akaike N., Sato M. Role of anions and cations in frog taste cell stimulation. Comp Biochem Physiol. 55A:1976;383-391.
4. Akaike N., Sato M. Water response in frog taste cells. Comp Biochem Physiol. 54A:1976;149-156.
5. Beidler L.M. A theory of taste stimulation. J Gen Physiol. 38:1954;133-139.
6. Beidler L.M. A personalized history of taste biophysics. Dawson W.W., Enoch J.M. Foundations of Sensory Science. 1984;351-380 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7. Bigiani A.R., Roper S.D. Mediation of responses to calcium in taste cells by modulation of a potassium conductance. Science. 252:1991;126-128.
8. Erickson R.P. Definitions. a matter of taste Pfaff D.W. Taste, Olfaction, and the Central Nervous System. A Festchrift in Honor of Carl Pfaffmann. 1985;129-150 The Rockefeller University Press, New York.
9. Eyzaguirre C., Fidone S., Zapata P. Membrane potentials recorded from the mucosa of the toad's tongue during chemical stimulation. J Physiol. 221:1972;515-532.
10. Faull J.R., Halpern B.P. Taste stimuli. time course of peripheral nerve response and theoretical models Science. 178:1972;73-75.
11. Frank M., Pfaffmann C. Taste nerve fibers. a random distribution of sensitivities to four tastes Science. 164:1969;1183-1185.
12. Hamill O.P., Marty A., Sakmann E., Sigworth F.J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 391:1981;85-100.
13. Heck G.L., Erickson R.P. A rate theory of gustatory stimulation. Behav Biol. 8:1973;687-712.
14. Herness M.S., Gilbertson T.A. Cellular mechanisms of taste transduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 61:1999;873-900.
15. + channel in frog taste cells. Am J Physiol. 244:1983;C82-C88.
16. Kimura K., Beidler L.M. Microelectrode study of taste bud of the rat. Am J Physiol. 187:1956.
17. Kimura K., Beidler L.M. Microelectrode study of taste receptors of rat and hamster. J Cell Comp Physiol. 58:1961;131-139.
18. Kusano K., Sato M. Properties of fungiform papillae in the frog's tongue. Jpn J Physiol. 7:1957;324-338.
19. Ling G., Gerard R.W. The normal membrane potential of frog sartorius fibers. J Cell Comp Physiol. 34:1949;383-396.
20. Miyamoto T., Okada Y., Sato T. Ionic basis of receptor potential of frog taste cells induced by acid stimuli. J Physiol. 405:1988;699-711.
21. Ogawa H., Sato M., Yamashita S. Multiple sensitivity of chorda tympani fibers of the rat and hamster to gustatory and thermal stimuli. J Physiol. 199:1968;223-240.
22. Okada Y., Miyamoto T., Sato T. Contribution of the receptor and basolateral membranes to the resting potential of a frog taste cell. Jpn J Physiol. 36:1986;139-150.
23. Okada Y., Miyamoto T., Sato T. Ionic mechanism of generation of receptor potential in response to quinine in frog taste cell. Brain Res. 450:1988;295-302.
24. Okada Y., Miyamoto T., Sato T. The ionic basis of the receptor potential of frog taste cells induced by sugar stimuli. J Exp Biol. 162:1992;23-36.
25. Okada Y., Miyamoto T., Sato T. Voltage clamping of a frog (Rana catesbeiana) taste cell with a single microelectrode. Comp Biochem Physiol. 106A(1):1993;37-41.
26. Ozeki M. Conductance change associated with receptor potentials of gustatory cells in rat. J Gen Physiol. 58:1971;688-699.
27. Ozeki M. Electrical activities of gustatory cells in the tongue of rat to stimuli representing four taste qualities. Memoirs Faculty Liberal Arts Educ. 23:1973;74-78.
28. Ozeki M. Hetero-electrogenesis of the gustatory cell membrane in rat. Nature. 228:1970;868-869.
29. Ozeki M., Noma A. The actions of tetrodotoxin, procaine, and acetylcholine on gustatory receptions in frog and rat. Jpn J Physiol. 22:1972;467-475.
30. Ozeki M., Oura C. Physiological and electron microscopical studies of gustatory responsive cell in the fungiform papilla of the rat. Proc Jpn Acad. 48:1972;544-547.
31. Ozeki M., Sato M. Responses of gustatory cells in the tongue of rat to stimuli representing four taste qualities. Comp Biochem Physiol. 41A:1972;391-407.
32. Pfaffmann C. Gustatory afferent impulses. J Cell Comp Physiol. 17:1941;243-249.
33. Rupuzzi G., Casella C. Innervation of the fungiform papillae in the frog tongue. J Neurophysiol. 28:1965;154-165.
34. Roper S. Regenerative impulses in taste cells. Science. 220:1983;1311-1312.
35. Sato T. The response of frog taste cells (Rana nigromaculata and Rana catesbeana). Experientia. 25:1969;709-710.
36. Sato T. Site of gustatory neural adaptation. Brain Res. 34:1971;385-388.
37. Sato T. Multiple sensitivity of single taste cells of the frog tongue to four basic taste stimuli. J Cell Physiol. 80(2):1972;207-218.
38. Sato T. Does an initial phasic response exist in the receptor potential of taste cells? Separat Exp. 32:1976;1426-1428.
39. Sato T. An initial phasic depolarization exists in the receptor potential of taste cells. Separat Exp. 33:1977;1165-1167.
40. Sato T., Beidler L.M. Relation between receptor potential and resistance change in the frog taste cells. Brain Res. 53:1973;455-457.
41. Sato T., Beidler L.M. Membrane resistance change of the frog taste cells in response to water and NaCl. J Gen Physiol. 66:1975;735-763.
42. Sato T., Okada Y., Miyamoto T. Molecular mechanisms of gustatory transductions in frog taste cells. Prog Neurobiol. 46:1995;239-287.
43. Sato T., Sugimoto K., Okada Y. Ionic basis of receptor potential in frog taste cell in response to salt stimuli. Jpn J Physiol. 32:1982;459-462.
44. Sato T., Sugimoto K., Okada Y., Miyamoto T. Ionic basis of resting membrane potential in frog taste cells. Jpn J Physio. 34:1984;973-983.
45. Smith D.V., Vogt M.B. The neural code and integrative processes of taste. Beauchamp G.K., Bartoshuk L.M. Tasting and Smelling. 1997;25-76 Academic Press, San Diego.
46. Taglietti V., Casella C., Ferrari E. Interactions between taste receptors in the frog tongue. Pflugers Arch. 312:1969;139-148.
47. Tateda H., Beidler L.M. The receptor potential of the taste cell of the rat. J Gen Physiol. 47(3):1964;479-486.
48. Tonosaki K., Funakoshi M. Intracellular taste cell responses of mouse. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 78A:1984;651-656.
49. Tonosaki K., Funakoshi M. The mouse taste cell response to five sugar stimuli. Comp Biochem Physiol. 79A:1984;625-630.
50. Tonosaki K., Funakoshi M. Cyclic nucleotides may mediate taste transduction. Nature. 331:1988;354-356.
51. Tonosaki K., Funakoshi M. Voltage- and current-clamp recordings of the receptor potentials in mouse taste cell. Brain Res. 445:1988;363-366.
52. West C.H.K., Bernard R.A. Intracellular characteristics and responses of taste bud and lingual cells of the mudpuppy. J Gen Physiol. 72:1978;305-326.