Seasonal CO2 assimilation and stomatal limitations in a Pinus taeda canopy

Tree Physiology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 435-445

  Ellsworth, David S ^a  

^a BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Annual CO2 assimilation; Canopy carbon gain; Climate variability; Drought; Evergreen photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance; Temperature

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FOREST CANOPY;

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0034176125     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/20.7.435     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baldocchi, D.D., C.A. Vogel and B. Hall. 1997. Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange rates above and below a boreal jack pine forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 83:147-170.
2. 2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light. Planta 165:397-406.
3. Campbell, G.S. and J.M. Norman. 1998. An introduction to environmental biophysics, 2nd Edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, 286 p.
4. Clark, K.L., H.L. Gholz, J.B. Moncrieff, F. Cropley and H.W. Loescher. 1999. Environmental controls over net exchanges of carbon dioxide from contrasting ecosystems in North Florida. Ecol. Appl. 9:936-948.
5. Dai, A., K. E. Trenberth and T.R. Karl. 1998. Global variations in droughts and wet spells: 1900-1995. Geophys. Res. Lett. 25:3367-3370.
6. Day, T.A., S.A. Heckathorn and E.H. DeLucia. 1991. Limitations of photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) at low soil temperatures. Plant Physiol. 96:246-1254.
7. Dewar, R.C., B.E. Medlyn and R.E. McMurtrie. 1999. Acclimation of the respiration/photosynthesis ratio to temperature: insights from a model. Global Change Biol. 5:615-622.
8. 2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ. 22:461-472.
9. Farquhar, G.D. and T.D. Sharkey. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33:317-345.
10. Farquhar, G.D. and S. von Caemmerer. 1982. Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In Physiological Plant Ecology II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Eds. O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond, and H. Ziegler. Encycl. Plant Physiol. New Ser., Vol. 12B. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 549-587.
11. 3 species. Planta 149:78-90.
12. Field, C.B., J.T. Ball and J.A. Berry. 1989. Photosynthesis: principles and field techniques. In Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation. Eds. R.W. Pearcy, J.R. Ehleringer, H.A. Mooney, and P.W. Rundel. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 209-254.
13. Ford, E.D. and R.O. Teskey. 1991. The concept of closure in calculating carbon balance of forests: accounting for differences in spatial and temporal scales of component processes. Tree Physiol. 9:307-324.
14. Goulden, M.L., J.W. Munger, S.-M. Fan, B.C. Daube and S.C. Wofsy. 1996. Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest: response to interannual climate variability. Science 271:1576-1578.
15. Goulden, M.L., B.C. Daube, S.-M. Fan, D.J. Sutton, A. Bazzaz, J.W. Munger and S.C. Wofsy. 1997. Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather. J. Geophys. Res. 102D:28987-28996.
16. Graham, N.E. 1995. Simulation of recent global temperature trends. Science 267:666-671.
17. Hansen, J., G. Vogg and E. Beck. 1996. Assimilation, allocation and utilization of carbon by 3-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees during winter and spring. Trees 11:83-90.
18. 3 leaves to environmental factors. In Modeling Crop Photosynthesis - from Biochemistry to Canopy. Eds. K.J. Boote and R.S. Loomis. Special Publication Number 19, Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 17-39.
19. 2. Plant Cell Environ. 15:271-282.
20. 2. Global Change Biol. 5:293-310.
21. Higginbotham, K.O. 1974. The influence of canopy position and age of leaf tissue on growth and photosynthesis in loblolly pine. Ph.D. Dissertation, Botany Department, Duke Univ., Durham, NC, 248 p.
22. Hocker, H.W. 1956. Certain aspects of climate as related to the distribution of loblolly pine. Ecology 37:824-834.
23. Jones, H.G. 1985. Partitioning stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 8:95-104.
24. Jurik, T.W., G.M. Briggs and D.M. Gates. 1988. Springtime recovery of photosynthetic activity of white pine in Michigan. Can. J. Bot. 66:138-141.
25. Kinerson, R.S., K.O. Higginbotham and R.C. Chapman. 1974. The dynamics of foliage distribution within a forest canopy. J. Appl. Ecol. 11:347-353.
26. Kramer, P.J. 1940. Root resistance as a cause of decreased water absorption at low soil temperatures. Plant Physiol. 16:63-79.
27. Kubiske, M.E. and M.D. Abrams. 1993. Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations of photosynthesis in 19 temperate tree species on contrasting sites during wet and dry years. Plant Cell Environ. 16:1123-1129.
28. Larcher, W. 1995. Physiological plant ecology, 3rd Edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 506 p.
29. Lassoie, J.P., T.M. Hinckley and C.C. Grier. 1985. Coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. In The Physiological Ecology of North American Plant Communities. Eds. B.F. Chabot and H.A. Mooney. Academic Press, New York, pp 127-161.
30. Maier, C.A. and R.O. Teskey. 1992. Internal and external control of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of mature eastern white pine (Pinus strobus). Can. J. For. Res. 22:1387-1394.
31. Matyssek, R. 1986. Carbon, water and nitrogen relations in evergreen and deciduous conifers. Tree Physiol. 2:177-187.
32. Radoglou, K. and R.O. Teskey. 1997. Changes in rates of photosynthesis and respiration during needle development of loblolly pine. Tree Physiol. 17:485-488.
33. Reich, P.B., M.B. Walters and D.S. Ellsworth. 1992. Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62:365-392.
34. Reich, P.B., T. Koike, S.T. Gower and A.W. Schoettle. 1995. Causes and consequences of variation in conifer leaf life-span. In Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests. Eds. W.K. Smith and T.M. Hinckley. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 225-254.
35. Schulz, R.P. 1997 The ecology and culture of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Agriculture Handbook 713, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C, 491 p.
36. Schulze, E.-D., M.I. Fuchs and M. Fuchs. 1977. Spatial distribution of photosynthetic capacity and performance in a mountain spruce forest in northern Germany. III. The significance of the evergreen habit. Oecologia 30:239-248.
37. Schwarz, P.A., T.J. Fahey and T.E. Dawson. 1997. Seasonal air and soil temperature effects on photosynthesis in red spruce (Picea rubens) saplings. Tree Physiol. 17:187-194.
38. Smith, W.K., D.R. Young, G.A. Carter, J.L. Hadley and G.M. McNaughton. 1984. Autumnal stomatal closure in six conifer species of the Central Rocky Mountains. Oecologia 63:237-242.
39. Strain, B.R., K.O. Higginbotham and J.C. Mulroy. 1976. Temperature preconditioning and photosynthetic capacity of Pinus taeda L. Photosynthetica 10:47-53.
40. Teskey, R.O., B.C. Bongarten, B.M. Cregg, P.M. Dougherty and T.C. Hennessey. 1987. Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol. 3:41-61.
41. Teskey, R.O., H.L. Gholz and W.P. Cropper, Jr. 1994. Influence of climate and fertilization on net photosynthesis of mature slash pine. Tree Physiol. 14:1215-1227.
42. Thornley, J.H.M. and I.R. Johnson. 1990. Plant and crop modelling: a mathematical approach to plant and crop physiology. Clarendon Press, New York, 669 p.
43. Troeng, E. and S. Linder. 1982. Gas exchange in a 20-year-old stand of Scots pine. I. Net photosynthesis of current and one-year-old shoots within and between seasons. Physiol. Plant. 54:7-14.
44. Walcroft, A.S., D. Whitehead, W.B. Silvester, and F.M. Kelliher. 1997. The response of photosynthetic model parameters to temperature and nitrogen concentration in Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1338-1348.
45. 3 plants - a retrospective analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 44:907-920.