ADD + : Including rhetorical structures in active documents

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 109-124

  Garcia, Ana Cristina Bicharra ^a   De Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius ^b  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Active Documents; Design Rationale; Natural Language Explanations; Rhetorical Structuring; RST

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; USER INTERFACES;

ACTIVE DESIGN DOCUMENTS (ADDS); NATURAL LANGUAGE EXPLANATIONS; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY (RST);

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0031124085     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060400001906     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ADDPROC, (1996). Final Project Report, CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
2. ADDVAC, (1995). Final Project Report, CENPES, PETROBRAS, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
3. Baudin, C., Sivard, C., & Zweben, M. (1990). Recovering rationale for design changes: A knowledge-based approach. Proc. IEEE Int Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 745-749.
4. Conklin, J., & Begeman, M.L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. Proc. 1988 Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW-88), pp. 140-152.
5. Conklin, J., & Burgess-Yakemovic, K. (1996). A process-oriented approach to design rationale. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, (Moran, T.P., & Carrol), J.M., Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Cunha, C.K.V., & de Souza, C.S. (1996). The role of explanation systems in multi-agent applications. Unpublished manuscript.
7. de Souza, C.S. (1993). The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. Int. J Man-Machine Stud. 39, 753-773.
8. de Souza, C.S., & Garcia, A.C B. (1994). Towards a rhetoric of design documents. Proc. XI Brazilian Svmposium on Artif. Intell. pp. 523-534.
9. Dong, A., & Agogino, A.M. (1996). Text analysis for constructing design representations. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '96, (Gero, J.S., & Sudweeks, F., Eds.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, The Netherlands.
10. Fischer, G., McCall, R., & Morch, A. (1989). JANUS: Integrating hypertext with knowledge-based design. Proc. Hypertext '89, pp 105-117
11. Garcia, A.C.B. (1992), Active design documents: A new approach for supporting documentation in preliminary routine design. Ph.D. thesis, civil engineering department, Stanford University, CA.
12. Garcia, A.C.B., & Vivacqua, A.S. (1996). The use of active documents to assist conflict mitigation in concurrent engineering. Proc. Int. Conf Current Eng (To be published).
13. Garcia, A.C.B., Andrade, J.C., Ferreira, R., & deMoura, R. (1996). ADDVAC: Applying active design documents to the capture, retrieval and use of rationale during offshore platform VAC design. Int. Conf. Knowledge Based Computer Systems. (Submitted).
14. Goel, A., Garza, A.G.S., Grué, N., Murdock, J.W., & Recker, M. (1996). In Artificial Intelligence in Design '96, (Gero, J.S., & Sudweeks, F., Eds.), Kluwer Academics Publishers, The Netherlands.
15. Gruber, T.R., & Russel, D.M. (1996). Generative design rationale; Beyond the record and replay paradigm. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, (Moran, T.P., & Carroll, J.M., Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
16. Hovy, E. (1990). Unresolved issues in paragraph planning. In Current Research in Natural Language Generation, (Dale, R., Mellish, C., & Zock, M., Eds.), pp. 17-46. Academic Press, London.
17. Hovy, E. (1993). Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artif. Intell. 63(1-2), 341-386.
18. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H.W.J. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems (working paper No. 131). University of California, Berkeley, Center for Planning and Development Research, Berkeley, CA.
19. Lee, J., & Lai, K.Y. (1991). What's in design rationale? Human-Computer Interaction 6, 251-280.
20. Mackeown, K.R. (1985). Text generation: Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. MacLean, A., Young, R.M. Bellotti, V.M.E., & Moran, T.P. (1991). Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 201-250.
22. Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190. Information Science Institute.
23. McCall, R., Bennett, P., d'Oronzio, P., Ostwald, J., Shipman, F., & Wallace, N. (1990). PHIDIAS: A PHI-based design environment integrating CAD graphics into dynamic hypertext. In Hypertext: Concepts, Systems and Applications, (Rizk, A., Streitz, N., & Andre, J., Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
24. Moore, J.D., & Paris, C.L. (1993). Planning text for advisory dialogue: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Computational Linguistics 19(4), 651-694.
25. Moore, J.D., & Swartout, W.R. (1993). A reactive approach to explanation taking the user's feedback into account. In Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, (Paris, C-L., Swartout, W.R., & Mann, W.C., Eds). Kluwer Academics Publishers, The Netherlands.
26. Oliveira, D.A.S., de Souza, C.S., & Haeusler, E.H. (1996). Structured argument generation in a logic-based KB system. Proc. of the Second Conf. Inf. Theoretic Approaches to Logic, Language, and Computation.
27. Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Storrosten, M., Carter, M., Herbsleb, J., & Rueter, H. (1996). The structure of activity during design meetings. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, (Moran, P., & Carroll, J.M., Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
28. Scott, D.R., & de Souza, C.S. (1990). Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In Current Research in Natural Language Generation, (Dale, R., Mellish, C., & Zock, M., Eds.). Academic Press, London.
29. Shum, S.B. (1996). Analyzing the usability of design rationale notation. In Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use, (Moran, T.P, & Carroll, J.M., Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.