What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 127, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 178-184

  Gabbard, Carl ^a   Rabb, Casi ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REVIEW;

ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0034171371     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221300009598577     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bradshaw, J. L., Bradshaw, J. A., & Nettleton, N. C. (1990). Abduction, adduction and hand differences in simple and serial movements. Neuropsychologia, 28, 917.
2. Bradshaw, J. L., Nettleton, N. C., Pierson, J. M., Wilson, L. E., & Nathan, G. (1987). Coordinates of extrapersonal space. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Neumphysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect (pp. 69-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland-Elsevier.
3. Bradshaw, J. L., Willmott, C. J., Umilta, C., Phillips, J. G., Bradshaw, J. A., & Matting-ley, J. B. (1994). Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychological Research, 56, 170-178.
4. Bryden, M. P., Singh, M., Steenhuis, R. E., & Clarkson, K. L. (1994). A behavioral measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill. Neuropsychologia, 32, 991-999.
5. Carnahan, H. (1998). Manual asymmetries in response to rapid target movement. Brain and Cognition, 37, 237-253.
6. Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Elliott, D. (1992). Asymmetries in the discrete and pseudo-continuous regulation of visually guided reaching. Brain and Cognition, 18, 169.
7. Elliott, D., & Chua, R. (1996). Manual asymmetries in goal-directed movement. In D. Elliott & E. A. Roy (Eds.), Manual asymmetries in motor performance (pp. 143-158). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
8. Elliott, D., Roy, E. A., Goodman, D., Carson, R. G., Chua, R., & Maraj, B. K. V. (1993). Asymmetries in the preparation and control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 570.
9. Fischer, M. H., Rosenbaum, D. A., & Vaughn, J. (1997). Speed and sequential effects in reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 404-428.
10. Gabbard, C., Iteya, M., & Rabb, C. (1997). A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 176-180.
11. Hellige, J. B., & Kee, D. W. (1990). Asymmetric manual interference as an indicator of lateralized brain function. In G. R. Hammond (Ed.), Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 635-660). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psycholo-gishche Forschung, 55, 270-279.
13. Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
14. Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Paasche, J., Duffy, M., & Grandt, K. (1997). Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1365-1379.
15. Perris, E., & Clifton, R. (1988). Reaching in the dark toward sound as a measure of auditory localization in infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 473-492.
16. Peters, M. (1995). Handedness and its relation to other indices of cerebral lateralization. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdaho (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 183-214). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Robin, D. J., Berthier, N. E., & Clifton, R. K. (1996). Infant's predictive reaching for moving objects in the dark. Developmental Psychology, 32, 824-835.
18. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control (pp. 218-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
20. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
21. Stins, J. E, & Michaels, C. F. (1997). Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 756-767.
22. Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., & Spencer, J. P. (1996). Development of reaching during the first year: Role of movement speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1059-1076.
23. Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In D. Holender, J. Juncan de Morais, J. Alegria, & D. Rodeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331-350). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 28, 435-444.
25. Verfaellie, M., & Heilman, K. (1990). Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: Implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks. Brain and Cognition, 14, 70-80.