Comparison of two different meat inspection techniques

Veterinary Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 75-83

  Kobel, A ^a   Bandick, N ^a   Koopmann, L ^a   Dahms, S ^b   Weiss H ^b   Fries, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Assessment of techniques; Directive 64 433 EEC; Macroscopic lesions; Meat inspection; Slaughter pigs; Visual meat inspection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD CONTROL; GERMANY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MEAT; METHODOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; STANDARD; SWINE;

ABATTOIRS; ANIMALS; EUROPEAN UNION; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FOOD INSPECTION; GERMANY; MEAT; QUALITY CONTROL; SWINE;

EID: 0034167504     PISSN: 01652176     EISSN: 18755941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2000.9695029     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bandick N, Kobe A, and Fries R. Einsatz eines Stallbuches in Schweinemastbetrieben als Informationsquelle ftir die Schlachttierund Fleischuntersuchung. Tierärztl Umsch.1997; 52: 387–92.
2. Bettini G, Marcato PS, Zaghini L, Ingra L, Sanguinetti V, and Grande V. An Anatomohistopathological Evaluation of Visual and Traditional Post Mortem Meat Inspection Procedures in Italian Heavy Pigs. In: Proc. 14th IPVS Congr., Bologna, Italy, 7-10 July 1996: p. 719.
3. Fleiss J. Statistical Methods for Rate and Proportion, J. Wiley & Son, New York, 1981.
4. Harbers AHM. Aspects of Meat Inspection in an Integrated Quality Control System for Slaughter Pigs. Doctoral Thesis, University of Utrecht, Netherlands 1991; pp. 109–12.
5. Harbers AHM, Elbers ARW, Geelen AJ, Rambags PGM, and Snijders JMA. Preselections of Finishing Pigs on the Farm as an Aid for Meat Inspection. Vet Quart 1992; 14: 46–50.
6. Harbers AHM, Smeets JFM, Faber JAJ, Snijders JMA, and Logtestijn JG van. A Comparative Study into Procedures for Post-Mortem Inspection for Finishing Pigs. J Fd Prot 1992; 55: 620–6.
7. Harbers AHM, Smeets, JFM, and Snijders JMA. Predictability of Post Mortem Abnormalities in Shipment of Slaughter Pigs as an Aid for Meat Inspection. Vet Quart 1991; 13: 74–80.
8. Harbers AHM, Smeets JFM, and Snijders JMA. Erfassung postmortaler Anormalitäten bei Schweinen an der Schlachtlinie. Fleischwirtsch 1992; 72: 131–8.
9. Harbers AHM, Snijders JMA, Smeets JFM, Blocks GHM, and Logtestijn JG van. Use of Information from Pig Finishing Herds for Meat Inspection Purposes. Vet Quart 1992; 14: 41–5.
10. Hathaway SC, Pullen MM, and McKenzie AI. A Model for Risk Assessment of Organoleptic Postmortem Inspection Procedures for Meat and Poultry. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192: 960–5.
11. Kobe A, Bandick N, Koopmann L, und Fries R. Feldversuche zur Modifizierung der amtlichen Schlachttier- und Fleischuntersuchung - praktische Durchfiihrung. Proc. DVG, Tagung der Fachgruppe Epidemiologie und Dokumentation, 4.-6. Septempber 1996: pp. 146–56.
12. Mousing J, Kyrval J, Jensen TK, Aalbaek B, Buttenschön J, Svensmark B, and Willeberg P. Meat Safety Consequences of Implementing Visual Postmortem Meat Inspection Procedures in Danish Slaughter Pigs Vet Rec 1997; 140: 472–7.
13. Willeberg P, Gardner J, Zhou H, and Mousing J. On the Determination of Non-Detected Rates at Meat Inspection. Prv Vet Med 1994; 21: 191–4.
14. Willeberg P, Wedam JM, Gardner IA, Holmes JC, Mousing J, Kyrval J, Enoe C, Andersen S, and Leontides L. A Comparative Study of Visual and Traditional post-mortem Inspection of Slaughter Pigs: Estimation of Sensitivity, Specificity and Differences in Non-Detection Rates. Epidemiol sante anim 1997; 31-32: 04.20.1–3.