Modificación enzimática de las propiedades funcionales, nutricias y sensoriales de la soya para alimentación especial

Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 26-34

  Calderón De La Barca, Ana María ^a   Medrano, Abraham Wall ^a   Marini, Martín Jara ^a   González Córdova, Aarón F ^a   Salazar, Adolfo Ruíz ^a  

^a Ctro Invest A Desarrollo A C   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Enzymatic modification; Soyprotein

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; METHIONINE; PEPTIDE; SOYBEAN PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; FOOD; FOOD HANDLING; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; RAT; SOYBEAN; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

AMINO ACIDS; ANIMALS; FOOD HANDLING; FOODS, SPECIALIZED; HUMANS; HYDROLYSIS; METHIONINE; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PEPTIDES; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SOYBEAN PROTEINS; SOYBEANS;

EID: 0034151228     PISSN: 00040622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mahmoud M. Physicochemical and functional properties of protein hydrolysates in nutritional products. Food Technol 1994;48:49.
2. Hajós G, Gelencsér E, Grant G, Bardocz S, Sakhri M, Duguid TJ, et al. Effect of proteolytic modification and methionine enrichment on the nutritional value of soya albumins for rats. J Nutr Biochem 1996;7:481.
3. Kasche V. Proteases in peptide synthesis. In: Beynon RJ, Bond JS, editors. Proteolytic enzimes a practical approach. England: Oxford University - IRL, 1990;25.
4. Arai S, Yamashita M, Fujimaki M. Nutritional improvement of food proteins by means of the plastein reaction and its novel modification. In: Friedman M, editor. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. USA:Plenum, 1978;663.
5. Halken S, Host A, Hansen L, Osterballe O. Safety of a new, ultrafiltred whey hydrolysate formula in children with cow milk allergy: A clinical investigation. Pediatr Allergy Inmunol 1993;4:53.
6. Rugo E, Wahl R, Whan U. How allergenic are hypoallergenic infant formulae. Clin Exp Allergy 1992;22:635.
7. Calderón de la Barca AM, Ruiz Salazar RA, Jara MME. Enzymatic hydrolysis and synthesis of soy protein to improve its amino acid composition and functional properties. J Food Sci. In press.
8. Parrado J, Bautista J, Machado A. Production of soluble enzimatic protein hydrolyzate from industrially deffated undehulled sunflower meal. J Agric Food Chem 1991; 39:447.
9. Deeslie WD, Cheryan M. Functional properties of soy protein hydrolyzates from continuous ultrafiltration reactor. J Agric Food Chem 1988; 36:26.
10. Li-Chan E, Nakai S, Wood DF. Hidrophobicity and solubility of meat proteins and their relationship to emulsifying properties. J Food Sci 1984; 49:345.
11. Vázquez OF, Caire G, Higuera I, Hernández G. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of free amino acids in shrimp. J Liquid Chromatogr 1995; 18:2059.
12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis of the AOAC. 15th. Edited by Kenneth Helrich; Virginia 22201. USA, 1990.
13. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and WHO.World Health Organization. 1991. Protein Quality Evaluation. Report of the joint expert consultation. Rome: 4-8, December 1989. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 51.
14. NCSS. Number Crunher Statistical Systems (computer program(. Statistical System for windows, version 6.0. USA:Hintse JL, 1996.
15. AACC. American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc. Approved methods committee, Compilers. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. Method 71-10: Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products. St. Paul(MI): American Association of Cereal Chemists, 1976.
16. Allen AK, Neuberger A, Sharon N. The purification, composition and specificity of wheat germ agglutinin. Biochem J 1973; 131:155.
17. Jurd RD, Bog-Hansen TC. Production of polyvalent antibodies for immunoelectrophoresis. In: Hames BD, Rickwood D. Eds. Gel electrophoresis of proteins. A practical approach. New York: Oxford university-IRL press 1989; 366.
18. Chu NM, Janckila AJ, Wallace H, Yam L. Assessment of a method for immunochemical detection of antigen on nitrocellulose membranes. J Histochem Cytochem 1989; 37:227.
19. González CAF, Calderón de la Barca AM, Cota M, Vallejo CB. Detección inmunoquímica de la adulteración de chorizo de cerdo con proteínas de soja. Food Sci Technol International 1998; 4:257-262.
20. Pedrero D, Pangborn R. Evaluación sensorial de los alimentos. 1 Ed. México:Alhambra Mexicana, 1989.
21. Avena BR, Cano MD. Guía para la selección y entrenamiento de jucces analíticos. Industria Alimentaria 1996; 4:20.
22. Jellinek G. Sensory evaluation of food. USA: Ellis Horwwood, 1989.
23. Addler-Nissen. Some fundamental aspects of food protein hydrolysis. A review of food protein hydrolysis. Methods in Food protein hydrolisis. In: Addler-Nissen. Enzymic hydrolysis of food proteins. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. 1986; 9,57,110.
24. Lozano P, Combes D. α-Chymiotrypsin in plastein synthesis. Effect of Hydroxylated additives on enzyme activity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1992; 33:51.
25. Bressani R. The role of soybeans in food systems. JAOCS 1981; 58:392.
26. Hussein S, Gelencsér E, Hajós G.Y. Reduction of allergenicity and increasing biological value of buffalo's milk proteins by enzimatic modification. J Food Biochem 1995; 19:239-252.
27. Ena JM, Van BE, Robben A, Schmidt D. Whey protein antigenicity reduction by fungal proteinases and pepsin/ pancreatin combination. J Food Sci 1995; 48: 1315.
28. Zhu H, Damodaran S. Heat-induced conformational changes in whey protein isolates and its relation to foaming properties. J Agric Food Chem 1994; 42:846.
29. Lahl WJ, Braun SD Enzimatic production of protein hydrolyzates for food use. Food Technol 1994; 48:68.
30. Boza JJ, Jiménez J, Martinez O, Suárez M, Gil A, Nutritional value and antigenicity of two milk protein hydrolyzates in rats and guinea pigs. J Nutr 1994; 124:1978.
31. Liener IE. Implication of antinutritional components in soybean food. Cri Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1994; 34:31.
32. Ziegler F, Ollivier JM, Cynober L, Masini JP, Coudroy-Lucas C, Levy E, et al. Efficiency of enteral nitrogen support in surgical patients:small peptides vs non-degraded proteins. Gut 1990; 31:1277.
33. Vaintraub IA, Yattara HB. Proteolysis of Kunitz soybean trypsin inhibitor. Influence on its activity. J Agric Food Chem 1995; 43:862.
34. Koide T, Ikenaka T, Ikeda K, Hamaguchi K. Studies on soybean trypsin inhibitors. IX. Reconstitution of an active derivative from two inactive fragments and the contribution of tryptophan-93. J Biochem 1974; 75:805-823.
35. Rackis JJ. Biological active componentes In: Smith S.C. eds. Soybean: Chemistry and Technology, v. 1 Proteins. Connecticut: Westport. Avi Publishing 1980; 158.