The future of ORL-HNS and associated specialties series: The future of audiological rehabilitation

Journal of Laryngology and Otology

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 167-169

  Baguley, David M ^a   Luxon, Linda M ^b  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL NATIONAL THROAT NOSE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Audiological rehabilitation; Digital; Evidence based medicine; Hearing aids

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; NOTE; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ECONOMICS; HOSPITALIZATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0034150503     PISSN: 00222151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/0022215001905102     Document Type: Note

References (34)

1. Moffat DA, Baguley DM, Beynon GJ, Da-Cruz M. Clinical acumen and vestibular schwannoma. Am J Otol 1998;19:82-7
2. Newman CW, Weinstein BE, Jacobson GP, Hug GA. The hearing handicap inventory for adults: psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear Res 1990;11:430-3
3. Noble W. Self-assessment of Hearing and Related Functions. London: Whurr Publishers, 1998
4. Arnold P. Is there still a consensus on impairment, disability and handicap in audiology? Br J Audiol 1998;32:265-71
5. Gatehouse S. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: derivation and validation of a client-centred outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10:80-103
6. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear Res 1995;16:176-86
7. Barcham LJ, Stephens SDG. The use of an open ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. Brit J Audiol 1980;14:49-54
8. Zhao F, Stephens SDG. Hearing complaints of patients with King-Kopetzky syndrome (obscure auditory dysfunction). Brit J Audiol 1996;30:397-402
9. Gagne JP, McDuff S, Getty L. Some limitations of evaluative investigations based solely on normed outcome measures. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10:46-62
10. Schweitzer C. Development of digital hearing aids. Trends in Amplification 1997;2:41-77
11. Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear Res 1996;17:133-61
12. Tjellstrom A, Hakansson B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:53-72
13. Goode RL, Rosenbaum ML, Maniglia AJ. The history and development of the implantable hearing aid. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:1-16
14. Lenarz T, Weber BP, Mack KF, Battmer RD, Gnadeberg D. Vibrant Soundbridge System: Ein neuartiges Horimplantat fur Innenohrschwerhorige. Teil 1: Funktionsweise und erste klinische Erfahrungen. Laryngorhinootologie 1998;77:247-55
15. Wilson BS. The future of cochlear implants. Brit J Audiol 19997:31:205-26
16. Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, et al. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study. Am J Otol 1998;19:591-7
17. Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Staller S, Menapace CM. The multichannel auditory brainstem implant: 6 month coinvestigator results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1997;52:l-7
18. Laszig R, Marangos N, Sollmann WP, Ramsden RT. Central electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway in neurofibromatosis type 2. Ear Nose Throat J 1999;78: 110-1, 115-7
19. Swan IR, Gatehouse S. The value of routine in-the-ear measurement of hearing aid gain. Br J Audiol 1997;29:271-7
20. Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear Res 1986;7:257-65
21. Dillon H. NAL-NL1: a new procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids. Hearing J 1999;52:10-6
22. Seewald RC, Ross M, Spiro K. Selecting amplification characteristics for young hearing impaired children. Ear Hear Res 1985;6:48-53
23. Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Am Surg Assoc 1995;97:1854-64
24. Killion MC, Fikret-Pasa S. The three types of sensorineural hearing loss: loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hearing J 1993;46:31-6
25. Moore BC, Glasberg BR. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998;32:317-35
26. Moore BC, Alcantara JI, Stone MA, Glasberg BR. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999;33:157-70
27. Ricketts TA. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness perception measures. Ear Hear Res 1996;17:124-32
28. Naylor G. Technical and audiological factors in the implementation and use of digital signal processing hearings. Scand Audiol 1998;26:223-9
29. Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1997
30. Robinson K. Evidence-based medicine and its implications for audiological science. Br J Audiol 1999;33:9-16
31. Berninger E, Karlsson KK. Clinical study of Widex sense on first time hearing users. Scand Audiol 1999;28:117-25
32. Arlinger S, Billermark E, Oberg M, Lunner T, Hellgren J. Clinical trial of a digital hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1998;27:51-61
33. Arlinger SD. Clinical assessment of modern hearing aids. Scand Audiol 1998;(Suppl 49):50-3
34. Gatehouse S. Speech tests as measures of outcome. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998;49:54-60