State and territorial boards of nursing approaches to the use of unlicensed assistive personnel

JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-21

  Thomas, Sue A ^a   Barter, Marjorie ^b   McLaughlin, Frank E ^c  

^a SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

^c SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; LEGAL ASPECT; LICENSING; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSING; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING ASSISTANT; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ACUTE DISEASE; EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; LICENSURE, NURSING; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NURSES' AIDES; NURSING ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; NURSING, SUPERVISORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034150103     PISSN: 15209229     EISSN: 1530073X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00128488-200002010-00004     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bloom JR, Alexander JA, Nuchols BA. Nurse staffing and hospital efficiency in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 1998;44(2):147-155.
2. Brewer CS, Frazier P. The influence of structure, staff type, and managed-care indicators on registered nurse staffing. J Nurs Adm. 1998;28(9):28-36.
3. Hoover, KW. Nursing work redesign in response to managed care. J Nurs Adm. 1998;28(11):9-18.
4. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 483.152-156, Washington, DC.
5. Title 22, Chap. 2.5, Sect. 71835n. Certified Nurse Assistant Program. Sacramento, CA.
6. Barter M, McLaughlin, FE, Thomas SA. Use of unlicensed assistive personnel by hospitals. Nurs Econ. 1994;12(2):82-87.
7. Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis, CK (eds). Nursing staff in Hospitals and Nursing Homes: Is it Adequate? Washington DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1996.
8. Ome RM, Garland D, O’Hara M, Perfetto L, Stielau J. Caught in the cross fire of change: Nurses’ experience with unlicensed assistive personnel. Applied Nursing. 1998;11 (3):101-110.
9. Bemreuter ME, Cardona S. Survey and critique of studies related to unlicensed assistive personnel from 1975 to 1997, Part 2. J Nurs Adm. 1997;27(7/8):49-51.
10. The American Association of Nurse Attorneys. Recommendations regarding unlicensed assistive personnel. Ellicot City, MD: The American Association of Nurse Attorneys, Inc.; 1998.
11. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. Delegation: Concepts and Decision-making Process. Chicago, II; 1995.
12. American Nurses Association. Registered Professional Nurses & Unlicensed Assistive Personnel. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Nurses Publishing; 1996.
13. National Vocational Qualification Standards. London, UK: City & Guilds; 1996.
14. McLaughlin FE, Barter M, Thomas SA, et al. Comparison of RNs in the United Kingdom and the United States: Perceptions of the RN role when working with nursing care assistants/unlicensed assistive personnel. (In press). Int J Nurs Pract.
15. Barter M, McLaughlin FE, Thomas SA. Registered nurse role changes and satisfaction with unlicensed assistive personnel. I Nurs Adm. 1997;27(1):29-38.
16. Booth D, Carruth AK. Violations of the nurse practice act: Implications for nurse managers. Nursing Management. 1998;29(10):35-10.
17. McGillis-Hall L. Policy implications when changing staff mix. Nurs Econ. 1998;16(6):291-297, 312.
18. Huber DG, Blegen M, McClosky JC. Use of nursing assistants: Staff nurse opinions. Nursing Management. 1994;25(5):64-68.
19. Buerhaus PI, Staiger DO. Future of the nurse labor market according to health executives in high managed-care areas of the United States. Image J Nurs Sell. 1997;29 (4):313-318.
20. McLaughlin FE, Thomas SA, Barter M. Changes related to care delivery patterns. J Nurs Adm. 1995;25(5):35-46.
21. Terry, RA. California BRN examines the mutual recognition model for nursing regulation. The BRN Refwrt. 1999;12(1):1,9.