Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 74-85

  Cooper, Megan M ^a   Carello, Claudia ^b   Turvey, M T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; WEIGHT PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034131898     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.74     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Amazeen, E. L. (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1, 102-119.
2. Ashby, F. G., & Lee, W. W. (1991). Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 150-172.
3. Ashby F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1991). A response time theory of perceptual independence. In J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 389-413). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1994). A response time theory of perceptual separability and perceptual integrality in speeded classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 423-466.
5. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
6. Carello, C., Santana, M.-V., & Burton, G. (1996). Selective perception by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1177-1190.
7. Chan, T.-C. (1995). The effect of density and diameter on haptic perception of rod length. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 778-786.
8. Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Den Hartog, J. P. (1961). Mechanics. New York: Dover.
10. Epstein, W. (1977). What are the prospects for a higher-order stimulus theory of perception? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 164-171.
11. Epstein, W. (1982). Percept-percept coupling. Perception, 11, 75-83.
12. Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the "muscular sense." Neuroscience, 60, 551-568.
13. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
14. Garner, W. R., & McGill, W. J. (1969). The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika, 21, 219-228.
15. Garner, W. R., & Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models and experimental paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 233-259.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (pp. 456-501). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1961). Ecological optics. Vision Research, 1, 253-262.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Gibson, J. J. (1982). On theories for visual space perception. In E. Reed & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism (pp. 76-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1970)
20. Goldstein, H. (1980). Classical mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21. Heider, F. (1959). The function of the perceptual system. Psychological Issues, 1, 35-52. (Original work published 1930)
22. Helmholtz, H. von. (1963). A treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1866)
23. Hochberg, J. (1974). Higher-order stimuli and inter-response coupling in the perception of the visual world. In R. B. MacLeod & H. L. Pick (Eds.), Essays in honor of J. J. Gibson (pp. 17-39). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Kibble, T. W. B. (1985). Classical mechanics. London: Longman.
25. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S., & Reed, C. (1989). Haptic integration of object properties: Texture, hardness, and planar contour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 45-57.
26. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
27. Lederman, S. J., Ganeshan, S. R., & Ellis, R. E. (1996). Effortful touch with minimum movement: Revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 851-868.
28. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342-368.
29. Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., & Reed, C. L. (1993). Constraints on haptic integration of spatially shared object dimensions. Perception, 22, 723-743.
30. Lee, D. N. (1978). The functions of vision. In H. L. Pick, Jr., & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 159-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1996). Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 795-817.
32. McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19, 97-116.
33. Owen, D. H. (1990). Perception and control of changes in self-motion: A functional study of information and skill. In R. Warren & A. H. Wertheim (Eds.), Perception and control of self-motion: Resources for ecological psychology (pp. 289-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Pagano, C. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Extero-and exproprio-perception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1191-1202.
35. Pagano, C. C., Fitzpatrick, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived extent over variations of dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 43-54.
36. Pagano, C. C., Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., Cassidy, P. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Role of the inertia tensor in haptically perceiving where an object is grasped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 276-285.
37. Reed, C. (1990). Perceptual dependence for shape and texture during haptic processing. Perception, 23, 349-366.
38. Reed, C., Lederman, S., & Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Haptic integration of planar size with hardness, texture, and planar contour. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 522-545.
39. Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distance reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427.
41. Solomon, H. Y., Turvey, M. T., & Burton, G. (1989). Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: Haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 58-68.
42. Stevens, S. S. (1961). The psychophysics of sensory function. American Scientist, 48, 226-252.
43. Stevens, S. S. (1962). The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychologist, 17, 29-39.
44. Turvey, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152.
45. Turvey, M. T., Burton, G., Amazeen, E. L., Butwill, M., & Carello, C. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35-48.
46. Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (1995). Dynamic touch. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: V. Perception of space and motion (pp. 401-490). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47. Turvey, M. T., Carello, C., Fitzpatrick, P., Pagano, C., & Kadar, E. (1996). Spinors and selective dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1113-1126.
48. Turvey, M. T., Park, H., Dumais, S. M., & Carello, C. (1998). Non visible perception of segments of a hand held object and the attitude spinor. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 3-19.