Valuation of environmental impacts of transport projects: The challenge of self-interest proximity

Journal of Transport Economics and Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 189-214

  Daniels, Rhonda F ^b   Hensher, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b State Transit Auth New South Wales

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; METHODOLOGY; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 0034115204     PISSN: 00225258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adamowicz, W. (1996): The Valuation of Environmental Externalities: Recent Advances in the use of Stated Preference methods. Presented at Canadian Resource and Environmental Economics Study Group, Montreal, Canada, 5-6 October.
2. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, J. Louviere, J. Swait, and M. Williams (1994a): Perceptions, Scaling and Choice Sets: Issues in Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Draft 3, November.
3. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, J. Louviere, J. Swait, and M. Williams (1994b): Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Rural Economy Staff Paper No. 94-07, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
4. Adamowicz, W., J. Swait, P. Boxall, J. Louviere, and M. Williams (1997): "Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 65-84.
5. Applied Economics (1994): M5 East Motorway Economic Evaluation. Specialist Working Paper for the Environmental Impact Statement, prepared for the Roads and Traffic Authority, Sydney.
6. Bateman, I., R. K. Turner, and S. Bateman (1993): "Extending Cost-Benefit Analysis of UK Highway Proposals: Environmental Evaluation and Equity", Project Appraisal, 8, 213-24.
7. Bates, J. (ed) (1988): "Stated Preference Methods in Transport Research". Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, special issue.
8. Bennett, J. W. and M. Carter (1993): "Prospects for Contingent Valuation: Lessons from the South-east Forests". Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 37, 79-93.
9. Blamey, R. and M. Common (1993): Stepping Back from Contingent Valuation. Presented at 37th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Sydney, 9-11 February.
10. Blamey, R., M. Common, and J. Quiggin (1995): "Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens?" Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39, 263-88.
11. Blarney, R., J. Rolfe, J. Bennett, and M. Morrison (1997): Environmental Choice Modelling: Issues and Qualitative Insights. Choice Modelling Research Report No. 4, The University of NSW, Canberra, June.
12. Boersch-Supan, A. and V. Hajivassiliou (1990): "Smooth Unbiased Multivariate Probability Simulators for Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models". Journal of Econometrics, 58, 347-68.
13. Boxall, P. C., W. L. Adamowicz, J. Swait, M. Williams, and J. Louviere (1996): "A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation". Ecological Economics, 18, 243-53.
14. Braden, J. B. and C. D. Kolstad (eds) (1991): Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Brewer, J. and A. Ross (1996): "Conclusions from the Environmental Impact Assessment of Sydney's M2 and M5 East Motorways". Proceedings Roads 96 Conference (Combined 18th ARRB Transport Research Conference and Transit NZ Land Transport Symposium), Part 6, 233-48.
16. Carson, R. T., M. Hanemann, and D. Steinberg (1990): "A Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Value of Kenai King Salmon". Journal of Behavioural Economics, 19, 53-68.
17. Carter, M. (1992): "The Use of Contingent Valuation in the Valuation of National Estate Forests in South-East Australia". In M. Lockwood and T. De Lacy (eds): Valuing Natural Areas: Applications and Problems of the Contingent Valuation Method. Johnstone Centre of Parks, Recreation and Heritage, Charles Sturt University, Albury (NSW), 89-100.
18. Centre for International Economics (CIE) (1997): Water Supply and Environmental Values: A Study to Assess Environmental Values Associated with Water Supply Options: Volume One Community Values Study Final Report. Prepared for ACTEW Corporation (formerly ACT Electricity and Water) under a grant from the National Office of Local Government, ACTEW Corporation, Canberra, May.
19. Colwell, R. (1974): "Predictability, Constancy and Contingency of Periodic Phenomena". Ecology, 55, 1148-53.
20. Daniels, R. (1994): "Monetary Valuation of the Environmental Impacts of Transport". Papers of the Australasian Transport Research Forum, 19, 365-82.
21. Daniels, R. (1997): "A Stated Choice Framework for the Valuation of Environmental Externalities of Road Projects". Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Transport Studies, The University of Sydney.
22. Edwards, S. F. (1992): "Rethinking Existence Values". Land Economics, 68, 120-22.
23. Environment Protection Authority (EPA) (1994): Victorian Transport Externalities Study, Volume 4, Summary Report. Publication No. 415, EPA, Victoria, May.
24. Freeman, A. M. (1993): The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
25. Geweke, J., M. Keane, and D. Runkle (1994): "Alternative Computational Approaches to Inference in the Multinomial Probit Model". Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXVI, 609-32.
26. Hausman, J. A. (ed) (1993): Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
27. Heinen, J. and R. Low (1992): "Human Behavioural Ecology and Environmental Conservation". Environmental Conservation, 19, 105-16.
28. Hensher, D. A. (1994): Stated Preference Analysis of Travel Choices: the State of Practice". Transportation, 21, 107-33.
29. Hopkinson, P. G., C. A. Nash, and N. Sheehy (1992): "How Much do People Value the Environment? A Method to Identify how People Conceptualise and Value the Costs and Benefits of New Road Schemes". Transportation, 19, 97-115.
30. Hunt Analytics (1994): Evaluating Core Values Regarding Transportation and Urban Form in Calgary Final Report on the Core Values Tradeoff Study. Report for the City of Calgary.
31. Hunt, J. D., J. E. Abraham, and D. M. Patterson (1995): "Computer Generated Conjoint Analysis Surveys for Investigating Consumer Preferences". Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Melbourne (11-14 July), Volume 2, 13-25.
32. Local Transport (1998): New Method of Appraisal Over-rides COBA to pick 37 Retained Road Schemes. Local Transport, 13 (August), 1.
33. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. Swait (2000): Stated Choice Methods and Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Manidis Roberts (1994): Proposed M5 East Motorway Fairford Road to General Holmes Drive Environmental Impact Statement 1994. Roads and Traffic Authority, Sydney.
35. McDermott Miller (1997): Social Benefits of Transport: Research Findings. Prepared by McDermott Miller for Wellington Regional Council, New Zealand.
36. McFadden, D. and P. A. Ruud (1994): "Estimation by Simulation". Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXVI, 591-608.
37. Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1989): Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
38. Morrison, M., J. Bennett, and R. Blarney (1998): Valuing Improved Wetland Quality Using Choice Modelling. Choice Modelling Research Report No. 6, The University of NSW, Canberra, April.
39. Nash, C. A. (ed), P. G. Hopkinson, A. D. May, A.D. Pearman, and M. R. Tight (1990): Appraising the Environmental Effects of Road Schemes: A Response to the SACTRA Committee. Working Paper 293, Institute for Transport Studies, The University of Leeds.
40. Nash, C. A., J. M. Preston,and P. G. Hopkinson (1991): "Applications of Stated Preference Analysis". In J. H. Rickard and J. Larkinson (eds): Longer Term Issues in Transport. Aldershot, Avebury, 41-80.
41. Opaluch, J. J., S. K. Swallow, T. Weaver, C. W. Wessells, and D. Wichelns (1993): "Evaluating Impacts from Noxious Facilities: Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 41-59.
42. Resource Assessment Commission (RAC) (1992): Forest and Timber Inquiry Final Report Volume 2B. Resource Assessment Commission Report, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
43. Rolfe, J. and J. Bennett (1996a) "Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens (Blamey, Common and Quiggin, AJAE 39:3) - A comment". Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 129-33.
44. Rolfe, J. and J. Bennett (1996b): Valuing International Rainforests: a Choice Modelling Approach. Presented at 40th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural Economics Society, Melbourne, 11-16 February.
45. Sælensminde, K. (1995): Stated Preference Methods: Methodological Problems and Results from a Conjoint Analysis Survey. Presented at PTRC's Roundtable on The Evaluation of Environmental Effects of Transport, The Hague, 19-20 June.
46. Sagoff, M. (1988): The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law and the Environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Stem, S. (1997): "Simulation-based Estimation". Journal of Economic Literature, XXXV, 2006-39.
48. Swait, J. and W. Adamowicz (1996): The Effect of Choice Environment and Task Demands on Consumer Behaviour: Discriminating between Contribution and Confusion. Presented at Canadian Resource and Environmental Economics Study Group, Montreal, Canada, 5-6 October.
49. Verhoef, E. (1994): "External Effects and Social Costs of Road Transport". Transportation Research A, 28, 273-87.
50. Willis, K., G. Garrod, and D. Harvey (1998): "A Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis as Applied to the Evaluation of New Road Proposals in the UK". Transportation Research D, 3, 141-56.