Unequal retinal and extra-retinal motion signals produce different perceived slants of moving surfaces

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 1857-1868

  Freeman, T C A ^a   Fowler, T A ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Depth perception; Extra retinal signals; Eye movements; Motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; PURSUIT, SMOOTH; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0034105124     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00045-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Braunstein M.L. Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1968;247-253.
2. Braunstein M.L. Structure from motion. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J. Visual detection of motion. 1994;Academic Press, London.
3. Braunstein M.L., Andersen G.J. Velocity gradients and relative depth perception. Perception & Psychophysics. 29:1981;145-155.
4. Braunstein M.L., Tittle J.S. The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;582-590.
5. Bruss A.R., Horn B.K.P. Passive navigation. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. 21:1983;3-20.
6. Cornilleau-Peres V., Droulez J. The visual perception of three-dimensional shape from self-motion and object-motion. Vision Research. 34:1994;2331-2336.
7. Dichgans J., Brandt Th. Visual-vestibular interaction and motion perception. Dichgans J., Bizzi E. Cerebral control of eye movements. Bibliotheca opthalmologica. 82:1972;Kargel.
8. Dijkstra T.M.H., Cornilleau-Peres V., Gielen C.C.A.M., Droulez J. Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Research. 35:1995;453-462.
9. Domini F., Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;426-444.
10. Freeman T.C.A. Path perception and Filehne illusion compared: model and data. Vision Research. 39:1999;2659-2667.
11. Freeman T.C.A., Banks M.S. Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors. Vision Research. 38:1998;941-945.
12. Freeman T.C.A., Fowler T.A. Perceived slant increases during smooth eye pursuit. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 40:1999;S167.
13. Freeman T.C.A., Harris M.G., Meese T.S. On the relationship between deformation and perceived surface slant. Vision Research. 36:1996;317-322.
14. Georgeson M.A., Freeman T.C.A., Scott-Samuel N.E. Sub-pixel accuracy: psychophysical validation of an algorithm for fine positioning and movement of dots on visual displays. Vision Research. 36:1996;605-612.
15. Gibson E.J., Gibson J.J., Smith O.W., Flock H. Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58:1959;40-51.
16. Harris M.G. Optic and retinal flow. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J. Visual detection of motion. 1994;Academic Press, London.
17. Harris M.G., Freeman T.C.A., Hughes J. Retinal speed gradients and the perception of surface slant. Vision Research. 32:1992;587-590.
18. Hayashibe K. Reversals of visual depth caused by motion parallax. Perception. 20:1991;17-28.
19. von Holst E. Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. British Journal of Animal Behaviour. 2:1954;89-94.
20. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Research. 26:1986;161-180.
21. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 66:1976;717-723.
22. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B208:1980;385-397.
23. Mack A., Herman E. Position constancy during pursuit eye movement: an investigation of the Filehne illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 25:1973;71-84.
24. Mack A., Herman E. The loss of position constancy during pursuit eye movements. Vision Research. 18:1978;55-62.
25. Maxwell A.E. Maximum likelihood estimates of item parameters using the logistic function. Psychometrika. 24:1959;221-227.
26. Meese T.S., Harris M.G. Computation of surfaces slant from optic flow: orthogonal components of speed gradient can be combined. Vision Research. 37:1997;2369-2379.
27. Meese T.S., Harris M.G., Freeman T.C.A. Speed gradients and the perception of surface slant: analysis is two-dimensional not one-dimensional. Vision Research. 35:1995;2879-2888.
28. Nakayama K. Differential motion hyperacuity under conditions of common image motion. Vision Research. 21:1981;1475-1482.
29. Ono H., Steinbach M.J. Monocular stereopsis with and without head movements. Perception & Psychophysics. 48:1990;179-187.
30. Rogers B.J., Graham M. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception. 8:1979;125-134.
31. Rogers S., Rogers B.J. Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics. 52:1992;446-452.
32. Wallach H., O'Connell D.N. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 45:1953;205-217.
33. Wertheim A.H. Motion perception during self-motion-the direct versus inferential controversy revisited. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 17:1994;293-311.
34. Wertheim, A. H., & Niessen, M. W. (1986). The perception of relative motion between objects during pursuit eye movements. Perception, 15, 49.
35. Wyatt H.J. Detecting saccades with jerk. Vision Research. 38:1998;2147-2153.
36. Yajima T., Ujike H., Uchikawa K. Apparent depth with retinal image motion of expansion and contraction yoked to head movement. Perception. 27:1998;937-949.