Assessing the outcome of IVF

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 900, Issue , 2000, Pages 345-350

  Templeton, Allan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE DURATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MATERNAL AGE; PARITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034099352     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06247.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. 1. HFEA. 1997. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Sixth Annual Report.: 1-45.
2. 2. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. US Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1997. 1995 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. 3: 1-23.
3. 3. CHAPKO, K.M., M.R. WEAVER, M.K. CHAPKO, D. PASTA & G.D. ADAMSON. 1995. Stability of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer success rates from the 1989, 1990, and 1991 clinic-specific outcome assessments. Fertil. Steril. 64: 757-763.
4. 4. HULL, M.G., H.A. EDDOWES & U. FAHY. 1992. Expectations of assisted conception for infertility. Br. Med. J. 304: 1465-1469.
5. 5. TAN, S.L., P. ROYSTON & S. CAMPBELL. 1992. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet 339: 1390-1394.
6. 6. ROSEBOOM, T.J., J.P.W. WERMEIDEN, E. SCHOUTE, J.W. LENS & R. SCHATS. 1995. The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patients, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum. Reprod. 10: 3035-3041.
7. 7. TEMPLETON, A., J.K. MORRIS & W. PARSLOW. 1996. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet 348: 1402-1406.
8. 8. SOCIETY FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE. 1998. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil. Steril. 69: 389-398.
9. 9. TEMPLETON, A.A. & G.C. PENNEY. 1982. The incidence, characteristics and prognosis of patients whose infertility is unexplained. Fertil. Steril. 37: 175-182.
10. 10. HULL, M.G.R., C.M.A. GLAZENER & N.J. KELLY. 1985. Population study of causes, treatment and outcome of infertility. Br. Med. J. 291: 1693-1697.
11. 11. COLLINS, J.A., E.A. BURROWS & A.R. WILLAN. 1995. The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil. Steril. 64: 22-28.
12. 12. FIVNAT (French In vitro National). 1993. French national IVF registry: analysis of 1986 to 1990 data. Fertil. Steril. 593: 595.
13. 13. NACKLEY, A.C. & S.J. MUASHER. 1998. The significance of hydrosalpinx in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 69: 373-384.
14. 14. FLEMING, C. & M.G. HULL. 1996. Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinx. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 103: 268-272.
15. 15. STAESSEN, C., Z.P. NAGY, J. LIU et al. 1995. One year's experience with elective transfer of two good quality embryos in the human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programmes. Hum. Reprod. 10: 3305-3312.
16. 16. Tasdemir, M., I. Tasdemir, H. Kodama, J. Fukuda & T. Tanaka. 1995. Two instead of three embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 10: 2155-2158.
17. 17. PREUTTHIPAN, S., N. AMSO, P. CURTIS & R.W. SHAW. 1996. The influence of number of embryos transferred on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). J. Med. Assoc. Thailand 79: 613-617.
18. 18. GROCHOWSKI, D., S. WOLCZYNSKI, M. KULIKOWSKI, W. KUCZYNSKI & M. SZAMATOWICZ. 1997. Prevention of high-order multiple gestations in an in vitro fertilization program. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 11: 327-330.
19. 19. HORNE, G., J.D. CRITCHLOW, M.C. NEWMAN, L. EDOZIEN, P.L. MATSON & B.A. LIEBERMAN. 1997. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme. Hum. Reprod. 12: 542-547.
20. 20. AZEM, F., Y. YARON, A. AMIT et al. 1995. Transfer of six or more embryos improves success rates in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization failures. Fertil. Steril. 63: 1043-1046.
21. 21. WU, M.Y., S.U. CHEN, H.F. CHEN et al. 1996. How many embryos should be transferred in in vitro fertilization and tubal embryo transfer? J. Formosan Med. Assoc. 95: 617-622.
22. 22. SVENDSEN, T.O., D. JONES, L. BUTLER & S.J. MUASHER. 1996. The incidence of multiple gestations after in vitro fertilization is dependent on the number of embryos transferred and maternal age. Fertil. Steril. 65: 561-565.
23. 23. TEMPLETON, A. & J.K. MORRIS. 1998. Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilisation. N. Engl. J. Med. 339: 573-577.