An antidumping law can be procompetitive

Pacific Economic Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-14

  Hartigan, James C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; LEGISLATION; TRADE POLICY;

EID: 0034098532     PISSN: 1361374X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.00086     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cassing, J. H. (1994) "Strategic Responses to Antidumping Laws and Legal Interpretations: Producing for Export Markets Using Lawyers and Other Factors of Production," Journal of Economic Integration Special Edition: Antidumping Laws and Their Enforcements 9, 156-71.
2. DeVault, J. M. (1993) "Economics and the International Trade Commission," Southern Economic Journal 60, 463-78.
3. Ethier, W. (1982) "Dumping," Journal of Political Economy 90, 487-506.
4. Fischer, R. and L. J. Mirman (1994) "Learning About Enforcement," Journal of Economic Integration Special Edition: Antidumping Laws and Their Enforcements 9, 214-40.
5. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole (1991) Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Gruenspecht, H. K. (1988) "Dumping and Dynamic Competition," Journal of International Economics 25, 225-48.
7. Hartigan, J. C. (1994), "Dumping and Signaling," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23, 69-81.
8. _ (1995) "Collusive Aspects of Cost Revelation through Antidumping Complaints," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 151, 478-89.
9. _ (1996a) "Predatory Dumping," Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 228-39.
10. _ (1996b) "Perverse Consequences of the GATT: Export Subsidies and Switching Costs," Economica 63, 153-61.
11. Hillman, A. and E. Katz (1986) "Domestic Uncertainty and Foreign Dumping," Canadian Journal of Economics 19, 403-16.
12. Leidy, M. and B. Hoekman (1991) "Spurious Injury as Indirect Rent Seeking: Free Trade Under the Prospect of Protection," Economics and Politics 3, 111-37.
13. McCutcheon, B. (1997) "Do Meetings in Smoke-Filled Rooms Facilitate Collusion?" Journal of Political Economy 105, 330-50.
14. Messerlin, P. (1990) "Antidumping Regulations or Procartel Law? The EC Chemical Case," The World Economy 13, 465-92.
15. Prusa, T. J. (1992) "Why are so Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?" Journal of International Economics 33, 1-20.
16. _ (1994) "Pricing Behavior in the Presence of Antidumping Law," Journal of Economic Integration Special Edition: Antidumping Laws and Their Enforcements 9, 260-89.
17. Reitzes, J. D. (1993) "Antidumping Policy," International Economic Review 34, 745-63.
18. Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1992) "The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopoly,"Journal of International Economics 32, 265-87.
19. Tirole, J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. US Congress (1979) Trade Agreements Act of 1979, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
21. US Department of Commerce. (1983) Code of Federal Regulations Title 19, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
22. Webb, M. (1992) "The Ambiguous Consequences of Antidumping Laws", Economic Inquiry 30, 437-48.