Habitat loss and changes in the species-area relationship

Conservation Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 893-898

  Ney Nifle, Muriel ^a,b   Mangel, Marc ^b  

^a Laboratoire de Physique UMR CNRS ENSL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTINCTION; HABITAT LOSS; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0034098278     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98163.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brooks, T. M., S. L. Pimm, and N. J. Collar. 1997. Deforestation predicts the number of threatened birds in insular southeast Asia. Conservation Biology 11:382-394.
2. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 124:255-279.
3. Coleman, B. D. 1981. On random placement and species-area relationship. Mathematical Biosciences 54:191-215.
4. Colwell, R. K., and G. C. Hurtt. 1994. Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious rapoport effect. American Naturalist 144:570-595.
5. Gaston, K.J. 1994. Rarity. Chapman & Hall, New York.
6. Gotelli, N. J., and G. R. Graves. 1996. Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
7. Harte, J., and A. Kinzig. 1997. On the spatial implications of species-area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns. Oikos 80:417-427.
8. He, L., and P. Legendre. 1996. On species-area relationship. American Naturalist 148:719-737.
9. Koopovitz H., A. D. Thomhill, and M. Andersen. 1994. A general stochastic model for the prediction of biodiversity losses based on habitat conservation. Conservation Biology 8:425-438.
10. Leitner, W. A., and M. L. Rosenzweig. 1997. Nested species-area curves and stochastic sampling: a new theory. Oikos 79:503-512.
11. MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson. 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17:373-387.
12. MacArthur, R., and E. O. Wilson. 1967 The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
13. McGuinness, K. A. 1984. Equations and explanations in the study of species-area curves. Biological Reviews 59:423-440.
14. Ney-Nifle, M., and M. Mangel. 1999. Species-area curves based on geographic range and occupancy. Journal of Theoretical Biology 196: 327-342.
15. Pimm, S. 1998. Extinction. Pages 20-38 in W.J. Sutherland, editor. Conservation science and action. Blackwell Science, Oxford, United Kingdom.
16. Pimm, S. L., and R. A. Askins. 1994. Forest losses predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92:9343-9347.
17. Pimm, S. L., and R. A. Askins. 1995. Forest losses predict bird extinctions in eastern North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92:9343-9347.
18. Pimm, S. L., G. Russell, J. Gittleman, and T. Brooks. 1995. The future of biodiversity. Science 269:347-354.
19. Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43:185-215, 410-432.
20. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New York.
21. Tilman, D., R. M. May, C. L. Lehman, and M. A. Nowak. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65-66.