Small canopy gaps influence plant distributions in the rain forest understory

Biotropica

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 252-261

  Svenning, Jens Christian ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Canopy gaps; Ecuador; Life history; Palms; Tropical rain forest; Understory plants

Indexed keywords

CANOPY GAP; HETEROGENEITY; RAINFOREST; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

EQUADOR; SOUTH AMERICA; YASUNI NATIONAL PARK;

EID: 0034085482     PISSN: 00063606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00468.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA, E. R., AND M. MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS. 1992. Demography and allometry of Cecropia obtusifolia, a Neotropical pioneer tree - an evaluation of the climax - pioneer paradigm for tropical rain forests. J. Ecol. 80: 275-290.
2. AMÉZQUITA, P. 1998. Light environment affects seedling performance in Psychotria aubletiana (Rubiaceae), a tropical understory shrub. Biotropica 30: 126-129.
3. BALSLEV, H., J. LUTEYN, B. ØLLGAARD, AND L. B. HOLM-NIELSEN. 1987. Composition and structure of adjacent unflooded and floodplain forest in Amazonian Ecuador. Opera Botanica 92: 37-57.
4. BORCHSENIUS, F., H. B. PEDERSEN, AND H. BALSLEV. 1998. Manual to the palms of Ecuador. AAU Reports. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
5. CHAZDON, R. L. 1986. Light variation and carbon gain in rain forest understorey palms. J. Ecol. 74: 995-1012.
6. _, AND N. FETCHER. 1984. Light environments of tropical forests. In E. Medina, H. A. Mooney, and C. Vásquez-Yánes (Eds.). Physiological ecology of plants of the wet tropics, pp. 27-36. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, The Netherlands.
7. _, AND R. W. PEARCY. 1991. The importance of sunflecks for forest understory plants. BioScience 41: 760-766.
8. CLARK, D. A., AND D. B. CLARK. 1987. Temporal and environmental patterns of reproduction in Zamia skinneri, a tropical rain forest cycad. J. Ecol. 75: 135-149.
9. _, AND _. 1992. Life history diversity of canopy and emergent trees in a Neotropical rain forest. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 315-344.
10. _, _, R. SANDOVAL M., AND M. V. CASTRO C. 1995. Edaphic and human effects on landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest palms. Ecology 76: 2581-2594.
11. CLARK, D. B. 1990. The role of disturbance in the regeneration of Neotropical moist forests. In K. S. Bawa and M. Hadley (Eds.). Reproductive ecology of tropical forest plants, pp. 291-315. Parthenon Publishing, Paris, France.
12. _. 1996. Abolishing virginity. J. Trop. Ecol. 12: 735-739.
13. _, D. A. CLARK, AND J. M. READ. 1998. Edaphic variation and mesoscale distribution of tree species in a Neotropical rain forest. J. Ecol. 86: 101-112.
14. _, _, AND P. M. RICH. 1993. Comparative analysis of microhabitat utilization by saplings of nine tree species in Neotropical rain forest. Biotropica 25: 397-407.
15. _, _, _, S. WEISS, AND S. F. OBERBAUER. 1996. Landscape-scale evaluation of understory light and canopy structure: methods and application in a Neotropical lowland rain forest. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 747-757.
16. CONDIT, R., S. P. HUBBELL, AND R. B. FOSTER. 1998. Tropical forest census plots: methods and results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama, and a comparison with other plots. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
17. CUNNINGHAM, S. A. 1997. The effect of light environment, leaf area, and stored carbohydrates on inflorescence production by a rain forest understory palm. Oecologia (Berl.) 111: 36-44.
18. DE GRANVILLE, J.-J. 1992. Life forms and growth strategies of Guianan palms as related to their ecology. Bull. Inst. Fr. Études Andines 21: 533-548.
19. DENSLOW, J. S. 1987. Tropical rain forest gaps and tree species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 431-451.
20. _, J. C. SCHULTZ, P. M. VITOUSEK, AND B. R. STRAIN. 1990. Growth responses of tropical shrubs to treefall gap environments. Ecology 71: 165-179.
21. DUIVENVOORDEN, J. F. 1994. Vascular plant species counts in rain forests of the middle Caquetá area, Colombian Amazonia. Biodiv. Conserv. 3: 685-715.
22. _. 1995. Tree species composition and rain forest-environment relationships in the middle Caquetá area, Colombia, NW Amazonia. Vegetatio 120: 91-113.
23. ELLISON, A. M., J. S. DENSLOW, B. A. LOISELLE, AND D. BRENÉS M. 1993. Seed and seedling ecology of Neotropical Melasromataceae. Ecology 74: 1733-1749.
24. GENTRY, A. H., AND C. DODSON. 1987. Contribution of non-trees to species richness of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica 19: 149-156.
25. _, AND L. H. EMMONS. 1987. Geographical variation in fertility, phenology, and composition of the understory of Neotropical forests. Biotropica 19: 216-227.
26. GRUBB, P. J. 1996. Rain forest dynamics: the need for new paradigms. In D. S. Edwards, W. E. Booth, and S. C. Choy (Eds.). Tropical rain forest research - current issues, vol. 74. Monographiae biologicae, pp. 215-233. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
27. HENDERSON, A. 1995. The palms of the Amazon. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
28. HOGAN, K. P. 1988. Photosynthesis of two Neotropical palm species. Funct. Ecol. 2: 371-377.
29. KAHN, F., AND J.-J. DE GRANVILLE. 1992. Palms in forest ecosystems of Amazonia. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
30. KING, D. A. 1996. Allometry and life history of tropical trees. J. Trop. Ecol. 12: 24-44.
31. LEVEY, D. J. 1989. Tropical wet forest treefall gaps and distributions of understory birds and plants. Ecology 69: 1076-1089.
32. LIEBERMAN, D., M. LIEBERMAN, R. PERALTA, AND G. S. HARTSHORN. 1985. Mortality patterns and stand turnover rates in a wet tropical forest in Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 73: 915-924.
33. _, _, _, AND _. 1996. Tropical forest structure and composition on a large-scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 84: 137-152.
34. LIEBERMAN, M., D. LIEBERMAN, R. PERALTA, AND G. S. HARTSHORN. 1995. Canopy closure and the distribution of tropical forest tree species at La Selva, Costa Rica. J. Trop. Ecol. 11: 161-178.
35. MACDOUGAL, A., AND M. KELLMAN. 1992. The understory light regime and patterns of tree seedlings in tropical riparian forest patches. J. Biogeogr. 19: 667-675.
36. MALO, J. E., AND J. M. OLANO. 1997. Predicción de la frequencia de especies nemorales del bosque amazónico a partir de variables topográficas sencillas. In R. Valencia and H. Balslev (Eds.). Estudios sobre diversidad y ecología de plantas: memorias del II Congreso Ecuatoriana de Botánica realizado en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, pp. 279-289. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
37. MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M., J. SARUKHÁN, AND D. PIÑERO. 1988. The demography of tropical trees in the context of forest gap dynamics: the case of Astrocaryum mexicanum at Los Tuxtlas tropical rain forest. In A. J. Davy, M. J. Hutchings, and A. R. Watkinson (Eds.). Plant population ecology, pp. 293-313. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, England.
38. MITCHELL, P. L., AND T. C. WHITMORE. 1993. Use of hemispherical photographs in forest ecology. Oxford Forestry Institute Occasional Papers no. 44, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
39. MULKEY, S. S., A. P. SMITH, AND S. J. WRIGHT. 1991. Comparative life history and physiology of two understory Neotropical herbs. Oecologia (Berl.) 88: 263-273.
40. OBERBAUER, S. F., D. B. CLARK, D. A. CLARK, AND G. VEGA. 1993. Light environment, gas exchange, and annual growth of saplings of three species of rain forest trees in Costa Rica. J. Trop. Ecol. 9: 511-523.
41. PEARCY, R. W., AND W. A. PFITSCH. 1997. The consequences of sunflecks for photosynthesis and growth of forest understory plants. In E.-D. Schulze and M. M. Caldwell (Eds.). Ecophysiology of photosynthesis, pp. 343-359. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
42. PHILLIPS, O. L., P. HALL, A. H. GENTRY, S. A. SAWYER, AND R. VÁSQUEZ. 1994. Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 2805-2809.
43. RENNER, S. S., H. BALSLEV, AND L. B. HOLM-NIELSEN. 1990. Flowering plants of Amazonian Ecuador - a checklist. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.
44. RICHARDS, P., AND G. B. WILLIAMSON. 1975. Treefalls and patterns of understory species in a wet lowland tropical forest. Ecology 56: 1226-1229.
45. ROMOLEROUX, K., R. FOSTER, R. VALENCIA, R. CONDIT, H. BALSLEV, AND E. LOSOS. 1997. Arboles y arbustos (dap ≥ 1 cm) encontrados en dos hectáreas de un bosque de la Amazonía ecuatoriana. In R. Valencia and H. Balslev (Eds.). Estudios sobre diversidad y ecología de plantas: memorias del II Congreso Ecuatoriana de Botánica realizado en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, pp. 189-215. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
46. SHEIL, D. 1995. A critique of permanent plot methods and analysis with examples from Budongo Forest, Uganda. For. Ecol. Manage. 77: 11-34.
47. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York.
48. SOLLINS, P. 1998. Factors influencing species composition in tropical lowland rain forest: does soil matter? Ecology 79: 23-30.
49. SVENNING, J.-C. 1999a. Microhabitat specialization in a species-rich palm community in Amazonian Ecuador. J. Ecol. 87: 55-65.
50. _. 1999b. Recruitment of tall arborescent palms in the Yasuní National Park, Amazonian Ecuador: are large treefall gaps important? J. Trop. Ecol. 15: 355-366.
51. TUOMISTO, H., K. RUOKOLAINEN, R. KALLIOLA, A. LINNA, W. DANJOY, AND Z. RODRIGUEZ. 1995. Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science (Wash. DC) 269: 63-66.
52. VAN DER MEER, P. 1995. Canopy dynamics of a tropical rain forest in French Guiana. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
53. VANDERMEER, J. H., J. STOUT, AND G. MILLER. 1974. Growth rates of Welfia georgii, Socratea durissima, and Iriartea gigantea under various conditions in a natural rain forest in Costa Rica. Principes 18: 148-154.
54. WELDEN, C. W., S. W. HEWETT, S. P. HUBBELL, AND R. B. FOSTER. 1991. Sapling survival, growth, and recruitment: relationship to canopy height in a Neotropical forest. Ecology 72: 35-50.
55. WRIGHT, S. J. 1992. Seasonal drought, soil fertility, and the species density of tropical forest plant communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 260-263.