High-Resolution MR Imaging of the Breast: Clinical Context

Radiographics

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1385-1401

  Orel, Susan G ^a   Hochman, Mary G ^b   Schnall, Mitchett D ^a   Reynolds, Carol ^a   Sullivan, Daniel C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.30; Breast neoplasms, MR, 00.121412, 00.121416, 00.12143; Breast neoplasms, staging, 00.30; Magnetic resonance (MR), coil arrays, 00.121412

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030279865     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.6.8946543     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187: 493-501.
2. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
3. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170:681-686.
4. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
5. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995; 197:387-395.
6. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
7. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:33-38.
8. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
9. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, et al. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast-lesions: initial experience. Radiology 1994; 193:97-102.
10. Hylton NM, Shimikawa A, Foo TKF, et al. A comparison of fast scan techniques for breast imaging (abstr). In: Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1993. New York, NY: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993; 856.
11. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196:115-122.
12. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1991; 157:267-270.
13. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:1-8.
14. Hochman MG, Orel SG, Powell C, Schnall MD. Fibroadenomas: the variety of appearances on MR imaging, with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology (in press).
15. Kelcz F, Santyr G. Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1995; 36: 287-338.
16. Lewis-Jones HG, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local recurrent breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1991; 43:197-204.
17. Doa TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187:751-755.
18. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:473-478.
19. Whitehouse GH, Moore NR. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 1994; 2:591-603.
20. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196: 415-419.
21. Guidi R, Fischer L, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86:614-619.
22. Solin LJ. Special considerations. In: Fowble B, Goodman RL, Glick JH, Rosato EF, eds. Breast cancer treatment: a comprehensive guide to management. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, 1991; 523-528.
23. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Toussaint C, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1994; 191:633-638.