Simultaneous doppler and catheter transvalvular pressure gradients across St Jude bileaflet mitral valve prosthesis: In vivo study in a chronic animal model with pediatric valve sizes

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1145-1154

  Solowiejczyk, D E ^a   Yamada, I ^a   Cape, E G ^a   Manduley, R A ^a   Gersony, W M ^a   Jones, M ^a   Valdes Cruz, L M ^a  

^a New York Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETER; HEMODYNAMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE GRADIENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SHEEP;

EID: 0032430124     PISSN: 08947317     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0894-7317(98)80011-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Wilkins GT Gillam LD Kritzer GL Levine RA Palacios IE Weyman AE Validation of continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of mitral and tricuspid prosthetic valve gradients: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter study Circulation 74 1986 786 795
2. Burstow DJ Nishimura RA Bailey KR Reeder GS Holmes DR Jr Seward JB Continous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of prosthetic valve gradients; a simultaneous Doppler-catheter study Circulation 80 1989 504 514
3. Kapur KK Fan P Nanda NC Yoganathan AP Goyal RG Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function J Am Coll Cardiol 13 1989 1561 1571
4. Baumgartner H Khan S DeRobertis M Czer L Maurer G Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro: a manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery Circulation 82 1990 1467 1475
5. Baumgartner H Khan S DeRobertis M Czer L Maurer G Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves J Am Coll Cardiol 19 1992 324 332
6. Gray RJ Chaux A Matloff JM DeRobertis M Raymond M Stewart M Bileaflet, tilting disc, and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics J Am Coll Cardiol 3 1984 321 327
7. Yoganathan AP Chaux A Gray RJ Woo YR DeRobertis M Williams FP Bileaflet, tilting disc, and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics J Am Coll Cardiol 3 1984 313 320
8. Habib G Benichou M Bonnet JL Jau P Bille J Djiane P Assessment of normal and abnormal prosthetic mitral valves by Doppler echocardiography Int J Cardiac Imaging 6 1990 11 21
9. Panidis IP Ross J Mintz GS Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 8 1986 317 326
10. Weinstein IR Marbarger JP Perez JE Ultrasonic assessment of the St Jude prosthetic valve: M-mode, 2-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiography Circulation 68 1983 897 905
11. Reisner SA Meltzer RS Normal values of prosthetic valve Doppler echocardiographic parameters: a review J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1 1988 201 210
12. Rashrian MY Stevenson DM Allen DT Yoganathan AP Harrison EC Edmiston WA Flow characteristics of 4 commonly used mechanical heart valves Am J Cardiol 58 1986 743 752
13. Kotler MN Mintz GS Panidis I Morganroth J Segal BL Ross J Noninvasive evaluation of normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function J Am Coll Cardiol 2 1983 151 173
14. Williams GA Labovitz AJ Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Bjork-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac vales Am J Cardiol 56 1985 325 332
15. Sagar KS Wann S Paulsen WHJ Romhilt DW Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Bjork-Shiley prosthetic valves J Am Coll Cardiol 7 1986 681 687
16. Rothbart RM Smucker ML Gibson RS Overstimation by Doppler echocardiography of pressure gradients across Starr-Edwards prosthetic valves in the aortic position Am J Cardiol 61 1988 475 476
17. Jones M Barnhart GR Chavez AM Jett GK Rose DM Ishihara T Experimental evaluation of bioprosthetic valves implanted in sheep Cohn LM Galluci V Cardiac bioprostheses 1982 Yorke Medical Books New York 275 292
18. Tamura K Jones M Yamada I Ferrand VJ A comparison of failure modes of glutaraldehyde—treated versus antibiotic—preserved mitral valve allografts implanted in sheep J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110 1995 224 238
19. Bland JM Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between 2 methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986 307 310
20. Ihlen H Molstad P Simonsen S Vatne K Ovrum E Geiran O Hemodynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve in the aortic position: comparison of noninvasive and invasive techniques Am Heart J 123 1992 151 159
21. Shigenobu Nakayama H Hisamochi K Yamamoto N Senoo Teramoto S Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Bjork-Shiley and St Jude Medical prostheses in the mitral position. Acta Med Okayama 45 1991 325 332
22. Baumgartner H Schima H Kuhn P Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients across bileaflet aortic valve prostheses Am J Cardiol 71 1993 1241 1243
23. Chambers J Cross J Deverall P Sowton E Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve J Am Coll Cardiol 21 1993 398 405
24. Matsuoka Y Nishiguchi T Nakachi T Hayakawa K Onitsuka T Koga Y Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of St Jude prosthetic mitral valves in children Acta Peadiatr Jpn 32 1990 663 669
25. Vandervoort PM Greenberg NL Pu M Powell KA Cosgrove DM Thomas JD Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses: localized high velocities and gradients in central and side orifices with implications for Doppler-catheter gradient relation in aortic and mitral position Circulation 92 1995 3464 3472
26. Teirstein PS Yock PG Popp RL The accuracy of Doppler ultrasound measurement of pressure gradients across irregular, dual, and tunnellike obstructions to blood flow Circulation 72 1985 577 584
27. Cape EG Jones M Yamada I VanAuker MD Valdes-Cruz LM Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number Circulation 94 1996 2975 2981