Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with aortic occlusion (Leriche syndrome)

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 401-410

  Ruehm, Stefan G ^b   Weishaupt, Dominik ^b   Debatin, Jörg F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Leriche syndrome; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; AORTA OCCLUSION; ARTERY GRAFT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLATERAL CIRCULATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; LERICHE SYNDROME; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANEURYSM, FALSE; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LERICHE'S SYNDROME; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0034069682     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200004)11:4<401::AID-JMRI8>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Leriche R. De la résection du carrefour aortoiliaque avec double sympathectomie lombaire pour thrombose artéritique de l'aorte; le syndrome de l'obliteration termino-aortique par arterite. Presse Med 1940;48:601.
2. Shehadi W, Toniolo G. Adverse reactions to contrast media: a report from the Committee on Safety of Contrast Media of the International Society of Radiology. Radiology 1980;137:299-302.
3. Shehadi W. Contrast media adverse reactions: occurence, recurrence, and distribution patterns. Radiology 1982;143:11-17.
4. Hessel S, Adams D, HL A. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;138:273-281.
5. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996; 198:725-732.
6. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1995;6:595-603.
7. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995;165:431-437.
8. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994;191:155-164.
9. Leung DA, McKinnon GC, Davis CP, Pfammatter T, Krestin GP, Debatin JF. Breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1996;200:569-571.
10. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography [see comments]. Radiology 1998;206:683-692.
11. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR 1998;171:599-604.
12. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67.
13. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1066-1072.
14. Burbank FH. AUR Memorial Award. Determinants of contrast enhancement for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 1983;18:308-316.
15. Turski PA, Zwiebel WJ, Strother CM, Crummy AB, Celesia GG, Sackett JF. Limitations of intravenous digital subtraction angiography. AJNR 1983;4:271-273.
16. Davis CP, Hany TF, Wildermuth S, Schmidt M, Debatin JF. Post-processing techniques for gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiographics 1997;17:1061-1077.
17. Gritter K, Laidlaw W, Peterson T. Complications of outpatient transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1987;162:125-127.
18. Adams DF, Fraser DB, Abrams HL. The complications of coronary arteriography. Circulation 1973;48:609-618.
19. Chahine R, Herman M, Gorlin R. Complications of coronary arteriography: comparison of the brachial to the femoral approach. Ann Intern Med 1972;76:862.
20. Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC, Bosniak MA, Libes RB, Birnbaum BA. Renal lesion characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: efficacy and safety in patients with renal insufficiency [see comments]. Radiology 1991;180:85-89.
21. Reinton V, Berg K, Svaland M, Andrew E, PT N, Rootwelt K. Pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection in patients with moderately impaired renal function. Acad Radiol 1994;1:56-61.
22. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:551-556.
23. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:877-881.
24. Twieg DB. The k-trajectory formulation of the NMR imaging process with applications in analysis and synthesis of imaging methods. Med Phys 1983;10:610-621.