Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 25-31

  Yu, Min Zhong ^a   Brown, Brian ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; TOPOGRAPHY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; WAVEFORM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0031032937     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(96)00046-4     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baseler, H. A., Sutter, E. E., Klein, S. A. and Carney, T. (1994). The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 90, 65-81.
2. Brodal, P. (1992). The Central Nervous System. Structure and Function. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 170.
3. Butler, S. R., Georgiou, G. A., Glass, A., Hancox, R. J., Hooper, J. M. and Smith, K. R. H. (1987). Cortical generators of the CI component of the pattern-onset visual evoked potential. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 68, 256-267.
4. Celesia, G. G. and Meredith, J. T. (1982). Visual evoked responses and retinal eccentricity. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 338, 648-650.
5. Cohn, R. and Hurley, C. W. (1985). Differential visual evoked cortical responses to direct and peripheral stimulation in man. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 61, 157-160.
6. Curcio, C. A. and Allen, K. A. (1990). Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 300, 5-25.
7. Curcio, C. A., Sloan, K. R., Kalina, R. E. and Hendrickson, A. E. (1990). Human photoreceptor topography. J. Comp. Neurol. 292, 497-523.
8. Darcey, T. M., Ary, J. P. and Fender, D. H. (1980). Spatio-temporal visually evoked scalp potentials in response to partial-field patterned stimulation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 50, 348-355.
9. Drasdo, N. (1977). The neural representation of visual space. Nature 266, 554-556.
10. Halliday, A. M. and Michael, W. F. (1970). Pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J. Physiol. 208, 499-513.
11. Hennerici, M., Wenzel, D. and Freund, H. J. (1977). The comparison of a small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis. Brain 100, 119-136.
12. Horton, J. C. and Hoyt, W. F. (1991). The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch. Ophthalmol. 109, 816-824.
13. Jeffreys, D. A. and Axford, J. G. (1972a). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16, 1-21.
14. Jeffreys, D. A. and Axford, J. G. (1972b). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Component of extrastriate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16, 22-40.
15. Jeffreys, D. A. and Smith, A. T. (1979). The polarity inversion of scalp potentials evoked by upper and lower half-field stimulus patterns: latency or surface distribution differences? Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 46, 409-415.
16. Lesevre, N. (1982). Chronotopographical analysis of the human evoked potential in relation to the visual field (data from normal individuals and hemianopic patients). Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 388, 156-182.
17. Lesevre, N. and Joseph, J. P. (1979). Modifications of the pattern-evoked potential (PEP) in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field (clues for the most probable origin of each component). Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 47, 183-203.
18. Maier, J., Dagnelie, G., Spekreijse, H. and van Dijk, B. W. (1987). Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Res. 27, 165-177.
19. Michael, W. F. and Halliday, A. M. (1971). Differences between the occipital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man. Brain Res. 32, 311-324.
20. Mulligan, K. and Sherk, H. (1993). A comparison of magnification functions in area 19 and the lateral suprasylvian visual area in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 97, 195-208.
21. Ossenblok, P. and Spekreijse, H. (1991). The extrastriate generators of the EP to checkerboard onset. A source localization approach. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 80, 181-193.
22. Rossini, P. M., Pirochio, M., Sollazzo, D. and Caltagirone, C. (1979). Foveal versus peripheral retinal responses: a new analysis for the early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 47, 515-523.
23. Skrandies, W. and Lehmann, D. (1985). Spatial principal components of multichannel maps evoked by lateral visual half-field stimuli. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 54, 662-667.
24. Srebro, R. and Wright, W. (1982). Pseudorandom sequences in the study of evoked potentials. Ann. NY Acacl. Sci. 388, 98-112.
25. Stensaas, S. S., Eddington, D. K. and Dobelle, W. H. (1974). The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J. Neurosurg. 40, 747-755.
26. Sutter, E. E. (1991). The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM J. Computing. 20, 686-694.
27. Sutter, E. E. (1992). Deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. In: Nonlinear Vision (eds R. B. Pinter and B. Nabet) CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 171-220.
28. Sutter, E. E. and Tran, D. (1992). The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res. 32, 433-446.
29. Sutter, E. E. and Vaegan. (1990). Lateral interaction component and local luminance nonlinearities in the human pattern reversal ERG. Vision Res. 30, 659-671.
30. Tusa, R. J., Tosenquist, A. C. and Palmer, L. A. (1979). Retinotopic organization of area 18 and 19 in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 185, 657-678.
31. Tyler, C. W. and Apkarian, P. A. (1982). Properties of localized pattern evoked potentials. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 388, 662-670.
32. Yiannikas, C. and Walsh, J. C. (1983). The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with the size of the stimulus field. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 55, 427-435.
33. Yoshii, M. and Paarmann, A. (1989). Hemiretinal stimuli elicit different amplitudes in the pattern electroretinogram. Doc. Ophthalmol. 72, 21-30.