Non-invasive coronary bypass graft imaging

Radiography

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 55-62

  Engelmann, M G ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Electron beam; Magnetic resonance; Spiral; Ultrafast

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0034066916     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/radi.1999.0230     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Lipton MJ, Takaro T, Clayman J, Maley T. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of medical versus surgical treatment for stable angina-progress report. Section 10. Factors associated with long-term patency after coronary artery bypass surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 28:1986;130-138.
2. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 90:1985;668-675.
3. van der Meer J, Hillege HL, Kootstra GJ. Prevention of one-year vein-graft occlusion after aortocoronary-bypass surgery: a comparison of low-dose aspirin, low-dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulants. The CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands [published erratum appears in Lancet 1993 Sep 11;342(8872):690]. Lancet. 342:1993;257-264.
4. Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ. Detection of patent coronary bypass grafts by computed tomography. A preliminary report. Circulation. 61:1980;826-831.
5. Moncada R, Salinas M, Churchill R. Patency of saphenous aortocoronary-bypass grafts demonstrated by computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 303:1980;503-505.
6. Daniel WG, Dohring W, Stender HS, Lichtlen PR. Value and limitations of computed tomography in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency. Circulation. 67:1983;983-987.
7. Heuser L, Lackner K, Hauser H. Validity of computed tomography for the demonstration of patent or occluded aortocoronary vein grafts. A multicenter study. ROFO Forstschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed. 137:1982;619-626.
8. Godwin JD, Califf RM, Korobkin M, Moore AV, Breiman RS, Kong Y. Clinical value of coronary bypass graft evaluation with CT. Am J Roentgenol. 140:1983;649-655.
9. Foster CJ, Sekiya T, Brownlee WC, Isherwood I. Computed tomographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts. Br Heart J. 52:1984;24-29.
10. Muhlberger V, Knapp E, zur Nedden D. Predictive value of computed tomographic determination of the patency rate of aortocoronary venous bypasses in relation to angiographic results. Eur Heart J. 11:1990;380-388.
11. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology. 176:1990;181-183.
12. Tello R, Costello P, Ecker C, Hartnell G. Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 17:1993;253-259.
13. Steiner P, Phillips F, Stiel G. The value of spiral computed tomography in the imaging of aortocoronary bypass vessels. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 160:1994;23-29.
14. Huppert PE, Salehi Gilani S, Duda SH, Seboldt H, Claussen CD. Spiral CT and CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 163:1995;119-126.
15. Engelmann MG, von Smekal A, Knez A. Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol. 80:1997;569-574.
16. Boyd, D, Lipton, M, Cardiac computed tomography, Proc IEEE, 1983, 71, 298, 307.
17. Brundage BH. What is the current role of ultrafast CT in coronary imaging. Cardiovascular imaging. 1996;Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. p. 531-44.
18. Tanenbaum SR, Kondos GT, Veselik KE, Prendergast MR, Brundage BH, Chomka EV. Detection of calcific deposits in coronary arteries by ultrafast computed tomography and correlation with angiography. Am J Cardiol. 63:1989;870-872.
19. Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B, Bachmann K, Kirchgeorg M. Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology. 196:1995;707-714.
20. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS, Matloff JM, Berman DS, Forrester JS. Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 8:1986;693-698.
21. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS. Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. Circulation. 75:1987;1018-1024.
22. Knez A, von Smekal A, Haberl R. The value of ultrafast computerized tomography in detection of the patency of coronary bypasses. Z Kardiol. 85:1996;629-634.
23. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K. Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol. 79:1997;856-861.
24. Stanford W, Brundage BH, MacMillan R. Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 12:1998;1-7.
25. von Smekal A, Knez A, Seelos KC. A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 166:1997;185-191.
26. Rubinstein RI, Askenase AD, Thickman D, Feldman MS, Agarwal JB, Helfant RH. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts. Circulation. 76:1987;786-791.
27. White RD, Caputo GR, Mark AS, Modin GW, Higgins CB. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 164:1987;681-686.
28. Frija G, Schouman Claeys E, Lacombe P, Bismuth V, Ollivier JP. A study of coronary artery bypass graft patency using MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 13:1989;226-232.
29. van der Wall EE, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Bruschke AV. Magnetic resonance imaging in coronary artery disease [see comments]. Circulation. 92:1995;2723-2739.
30. Jenkins JP, Love HG, Foster CJ, Isherwood I, Rowlands DJ. Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol. 61:1988;2-4.
31. White RD, Pflugfelder PW, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB. Coronary artery bypass grafts: evaluation of patency with cine MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 150:1988;1271-1274.
32. Aurigemma GP, Reichek N, Axel L, Schiebler M, Harris C, Kressel HY. Noninvasive determination of coronary artery bypass graft patency by cine magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 80:1989;1595-1602.
33. Galijee MA, van Rossum AC, Doesburg T, van Eenige MJ, Visser CA. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing patency and function of coronary artery bypass grafts. An angiographically controlled study. Circulation. 93:1996;660-666.
34. Kessler W, Achenbach S, Moshage W. Usefulness of respiratory gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography in assessing narrowings > or =50% in diameter in native coronary arteries and in aortocoronary bypass conduits. Am J Cardiol. 80:1997;989-993.
35. Manning WJ. Current and future applications of magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Cardiovascular imaging. 1996;Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. p. 329-55.
36. Hoogendoorn LI, Pattynama PM, Buis B, van der Geest RJ, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Noninvasive evaluation of aortocoronary bypass grafts with magnetic resonance flow mapping. Am J Cardiol. 75:1995;845-848.
37. Manning WJ, Atkinson DJ, Grossman W, Paulin S, Edelman RR. First-pass nuclear magnetic resonance imaging studies using gadolinium-DTPA in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 18:1991;959-965.
38. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 191:1994;155-164.
39. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med. 336:1997;1422-1427.
40. Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Aliabadi D, Shetty AN, Simonetti O. Contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography for evaluating patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Roentgenol. 168:1997;1073-1080.
41. Wintersperger BJ, Engelmann MG, von Smekal A. Patency of coronary bypass grafts: assessment with breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography-value of a non-electrocardiographically triggered technique. Radiology. 208:1998;345-351.