Spectral analysis of base flow separation with digital filters

Water Resources Research

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 745-752

  Spongberg, M E ^a,b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL FILTERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RUNOFF; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STREAM FLOW;

FLOW SEPARATION; FOURIER ANALYSIS;

WATER RESOURCES;

BASEFLOW; FILTER; SEPARATION; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0034060297     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1999WR900303     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Angelini, P., Correlation and spectral analysis of two hydrogeological systems in central Italy, Hydrol. Sci. J., 42, 425-434, 1947.
2. Arnold, J. G., P. M. Allen, R. Muttiah, and G. Bernhardt, Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water, 33, 1010-1018, 1995.
3. Chapman, T. G., Unit hydrograph identification using only streamflow data, Eng. Aust., CE29, 187-191, 1987.
4. Daniel, J. F., Estimating groundwater evapotranspiration from streamflow records, Water Resour. Res., 12, 360-364, 1976.
5. Fitzgerald, J., and C. Clifton, Flooding, land use, and watershed response in the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington, Hydata, 17, 10-11, 1998.
6. Folland, G. B., Fourier Analysis and Its Applications, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1992.
7. Hooper, R. P., and C. A. Shoemaker, A comparison of chemical and isotopic hydrograph separation, Water Resour. Res., 22, 1444-1454, 1986.
8. Hoos, A. B., Recharge Rates and Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristics For Selected Drainage Basins in Middle and East Tennessee, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep., 90-4015, 1990.
9. Jakeman, A. J., and G. M. Hornberger, How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2637-2649, 1993.
10. Jakeman, A. J., and G. M. Hornberger, Reply to comment by T. Chapman on "How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?" by A. J. Jakeman and G. M. Hornberger, Water Resour. Res., 30, 3567, 1994.
11. Klaasen, B., and D. H. Pilgrim. Hydrograph recession constants for New South Wales streams, J. Inst. Eng. Aust., CE17, 43-49, 1975.
12. Larocque, M., A. Mangin, M. Razack, and O. Banton, Contribution of correlation and spectral analyses to the regional study of a large karst aquifer (Charente, France), J. Hydrol., 205, 217-231, 1998.
13. Laudon, H., and O. Slaymaker, Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes, silica and electrical conductivity: An alpine example, J. Hydrol., 201, 82-101, 1997.
14. Lyne, V., and M. Hollick, Stochastic time-variable rainfall runoff modeling, paper presented at Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Natl. Comm. on Hydrol. and Water Resour. of the Inst. of Eng., Perth, Western Aust., Australia, 1979.
15. Manga, M., Hydrology of spring-dominated streams in the Oregon Cascades, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2435-2439, 1996.
16. Mau, D. P., and T. C. Winter, Estimating ground-water recharge from streamflow hydrographs for a small mountain watershed in a temperate humid climate, New Hampshire, USA, Ground Water, 35, 291-304, 1997.
17. McNamara, J. P., D. L. Kane, and L. D. Hinzman, Hydrograph separations in an Arctic watershed using mixing model and graphical techniques, Water Resour. Res., 33, 1707-1720, 1997.
18. Nathan, R. J., and T. A. McMahon, Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1465-1473, 1990.
19. Newton, H. J., TIMESLAB: A Time Series Analysis Laboratory, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1988.
20. Nœtinger, B., and Y. Gautier, Use of the Fourier-Laplace transform and of diagrammatical methods to interpret pumping tests in heterogeneous reservoirs, Adv. Water Resour., 21, 581-590, 1998.
21. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vettering, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1992.
22. Rieger, W. A., and L. J. Olive, A comparison of baseflow separation techniques, in Drainage Basin Sediment Delivery, edited by R. F. Hadley, pp. 477-481, IASH Publ., 159, 1986.
23. Riggs, H. C., The base flow recession curve as an indicator of ground water, IASH Publ., 63, 352-363, 1963.
24. Roberts, R. A., and C. T. Mullis, Digital Signal Processing, Addison-Wesley-Longman, Reading, Mass., 1987.
25. Scales, J. A., Theory of Seismic Imaging, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
26. Schicht, R. J., and W. C. Walton, Hydrologic budgets for three small watersheds in Illinois, Rep. Invest., Ill. State Water Surv., 40, 1961.
27. Schwartz, M., and L. Shaw, Signal Processing: Discrete Spectral Analysis, Detection, and Estimation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
28. Singh, K. P., Some factors affecting base flow, Water Resour. Res., 4, 985-999, 1968.
29. Soil Conservation Service, National Engineering Handbook, U.S. Dep. of Agric., Washington, D. C., 1972.
30. Spongberg, M. E., Baseflow separation formulated as a frequency domain signal processing problem (abstract), Eos Trans. AGU, 79(45), Fall Meet. Suppl., F280, 1998.
31. Trainer, F. W., and F. A. Watkins, Use of base-runoff recession curve to determine areal transmissivities in the upper Potomac river basin, J. Res. U.S. Geol. Surv., 2, 125-131, 1974.
32. Venugopal, V., and E. Foufoula-Georgiou, Energy decomposition of rainfall in the time-frequency-scale domain using wavelet packets, J. Hydrol., 187, 3-28, 1996.
33. Walker, J. S., Fast Fourier Transforms, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1996.
34. Williams, C. S., Designing Digital Filters, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1986.