A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: Analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 479-487

  Reading, A D ^a   McCaskie, A W ^b   Barnes, M R ^c   Gregg, P J ^b  

^a GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Cement; Hip; Modern; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MECHANICS; PRESSURE; SHEAR STRESS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0034053666     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.5266     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Goldring SR, Clark CR, Wright TM: The problem in total joint arthroplasty: aseptic loosening (editorial). J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:799, 1993
2. Bulstrode CJK, Carr A, Murray D: Prediction of future work-load in total joint replacement. p 25. In Wallace WA (ed): The institution of mechanical engineers. Joint replacement in the 1990s: clinical studies, financial implications and marketing approaches. Bury St. Edmunds, Mechanical Engineering Publications, 1992
3. Lee AJC, Ling RSM: Loosening, p 137. In Ling RSM (ed): Complications of total hip replacement. Edinburgh, Churchill-Livingstone, 1982
4. Huiskes R: The current state and future of cemented and non-cemented total hip replacement. Post Graduate Lectures Efort Masson 1:52, 1993
5. Harris WH: Osteolysis and partide disease in hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113, 1994
6. Taylor M, Tanner KE: Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:181, 1997
7. Hukkanen M, Corbett SA, Batten J, et al: Aseptic loosening of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:467, 1997
8. Apple AM, Sauder WG, Siverhuss W, et al: Prosthesis associated membrane induced bone resorption. Br J Rheumatol 29:32, 1990
9. Wang W, Ferguson DJR Quinn JMW, et al: Biomaterial partide phagocytosis by bone-resorbing osteoclasts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:849, 1997
10. McCaskie AW, Harper WM, Gregg PJ: Femoral cementation technique: a survey of current UK Practice. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(suppl):137, 1994
11. Hashemi-Nejad A, Birch NC, Goddard NJ: Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:396, 1994
12. Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH: The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hi p replacement, an 11-year radiographic follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:757, 1990
13. Halawa M, Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Vangala SS: The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 92:19, 1978
14. Majkowski RS, Miles AW, Bannister GC, et al: Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:459, 1993
15. Gruen TA, Markolf KL, Amstutz HC: Effects of laminations and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone cement. Clin Orthop 119:250, 1976
16. Oh I, Carlson CE, Tomford WW, et al: Improved fixation of the femoral component after total hip replacement using a methacrylate intramedullary plug. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:608, 1978
17. Oh I, Bourne RB, Harris WE: The femoral cement compactor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1335, 1983
18. Oh I, Harris WE: A cement fixation system for total hiparthroplasty. Clin Orthop 164:221, 1982
19. Weber BG: Pressurised cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 232:87, 1988
20. McCaskie AW, Barnes MR, Lin E, et al: Cement pressurisation during hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:379, 1997
21. Bannister GC, Miles AW: The influence of cementing technique strength of the bone-cement interface. Engineering in Medicine 17:131, 1988
22. Ling RSM: Cementing techniques in the femur. Tech Orthop 6:34, 1991
23. Heyes-Moore GH, Ling RSM: Current cementing techniques. In Morti R (ed): Progressin cemented total hip surgery and revision: proceedings of asymposium heldin Amsterdam. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1982
24. Benjamin JB, Gie GA, Lee AJC, et al: Cementing techniques and the effect of bleeding. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:620, 1987
25. Miller J, Krause WR, Krug WH, et al: Low viscosity cement. Orthop Trans 5:352, 1981
26. Markolf KL, Amstutz HC: In vitro measurement of bone-acrylicinterface pressure during femoral component insertion. Clin Orthop 121:60, 1976
27. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, et al: The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1543, 1995
28. Malchau H, Herberts P: Prognosis of total hip replacement. Scientific Exhibition 63rd Annual Meeting of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, GA, 1996
29. Ward AJ, Smith EJ, Barlow JW, et al: The in vitro measurement of bone-cement interface pressures and shear strengths in the femur: a comparison of two cementation methods. Hip Int 5:124, 1995
30. MacDonald BE, Swarts E, Beaver R: Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo. Clin Orthop 286:283, 1993
31. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
32. Charnley J: Low friction arthroplasty of the hip theory and practice. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1979
33. McCaskie AW: Studies related to the cemented fixation of the femoral component at total hip replacement. MD Thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester, 1995