Fine structure and multicomponents of the electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in gerbil

Hearing Research

Volumn 143, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 58-68

  Ren, Tianying ^a   Nuttall, Alfred L ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlea; Cochlear amplifier; Electrical stimulation; Electrically evoked otoacoustic emission; Furosemide; Otoacoustic emission; Signal processing

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; GERBIL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; COCHLEA; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FUROSEMIDE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0034027921     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00027-7     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ashmore J.F. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: the cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 388:1987;323-347.
2. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3260-3267.
3. Brownell W.E., Bader C.R., Bertrand D., de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science. 227:1985;194-196.
4. Cohen L. Time-frequency distributions - A review. Proc. IEEE. 77:1989;941-981.
5. Dallos P. The active cochlea. J. Neurosci. 12:1992;4575-4585.
6. Dallos P., Evans B.N., Hallworth R. Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 350:1991;155-157.
7. D'Antonio P., Konnert J. Complex time-response measurements using time-delay spectrometry (dedicated to late Rihard C. Heyser). J. Audio Eng. Soc. 37:(9):1989;674-690.
8. Davis H. A model for transducer action in the cochlea. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30:1965;181-190.
9. Fahey P.F., Allen J.B. Measurement of distortion product phase in the ear canal of the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;2880-2891.
10. Gaskill S.A., Brown A.M. The behaviour of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;821-839.
11. Harris F.P., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Stagner B.B., Coats A.C., Martin G.K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:1989;220-229.
12. He N.J., Schmiedt R.A. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;2659-2669.
13. Hubbard A.E., Mountain D.C. Alternating current delivered into the scala media alters sound pressure at the eardrum. Science. 222:1983;510-512.
14. Kemp D.T. The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure-evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand. Audiol. 9:(Suppl.):1979;35-47.
15. Kirk D.L., Yates G.K. Frequency tuning and acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3714-3725.
16. Long G.R. The microstructure of quiet and masked thresholds. Hear. Res. 15:1984;73-87.
17. Mills D.M., Norton S.J., Rubel E.W. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;2108-2122.
18. Mountain D.C., Hubbard A.E. Rapid force production in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 42:1989;195-202.
19. Murata K., Moriyama T., Hosokawa Y., Minami S. Alternating current induced otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 55:1991;201-214.
20. Nuttall A.L., Ren T. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 92:1995;170-177.
21. Poletti M.A. Linearly swept frequency measurements, time-delay spectrometry and the Wigner distribution. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 36:1988;457-468.
22. Ren T. Acoustic modulation of electrically evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions in gerbil cochlea. Neurosci. Lett. 207:1996;167-170.
23. Ren T., Nuttall A.L. Extracochlear electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions: a model for in vivo assessment of outer hair cell electromotility. Hear. Res. 92:1995;178-183.
24. Ren T., Nuttall A.L. Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea. Hear. Res. 120:(7-16):1998;1998.
25. Ren T., Nuttall A.L., Miller J.M. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea. Hear. Res. 102:1996;43-50.
26. Ren, T., Nuttall, A.L., Parthasarathi, A.A., 2000. Quantitative measure of multiple components of otoacoustic emissions. J. Neurosci. Methods, in press.
27. Ronken D.A., Eldredge D.H. Identification of local and propagating distortion products from cochlear microphonic responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1981;410-425.
28. Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;1057-1067.
29. Rybak L.P., Morizono T. Effects of topical sodium potassium ATPase inhibitors upon endocochlear potential in chinchilla. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 90:1982;808-813.
30. Sakaguchi N., Crouch J.J., Lytle C., Schulte B.A. Na-K-Cl cotransporter expression in the developing and senescent gerbil cochlea. Hear. Res. 118:1998;114-122.
31. Santos-Sacchi J. Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movements of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti. J. Neurosci. 9:1998;2954-2962.
32. Schloth E., Zwicker E. Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 11:1983;285-293.
33. Schmiedt R.A., Zwislocki J.J. Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear-microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61:1977;133-149.
34. Sewell W.F. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear. Res. 14:1984;305-314.
35. Stover L.J., Neely S.T., Gorga M.P. Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;1016-1024.
36. Sun X.M., Schmiedt R.A., He N.J., Lam C.F. Modeling the fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product. I. Model development. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2166-2174.
37. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;275-292.
38. Wilson, J.P., 1980. In: Van den Brink, G., Bilsen, F.A. (Eds.), Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing, Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 43-50.
39. Zweig G., Shera C.A. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;2018-2047.