Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasi-geoid determinations

Journal of Geodesy

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 255-268

  Sjoberg L E ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Direct effect; Helmert reduction; Stokes' formula; Topographic effect

Indexed keywords

GEOID; STOKES FORMULA; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT;

EID: 0034016901     PISSN: 09497714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001900050284     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bjerhammar A (1962) Gravity reduction to a spherical surface. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm
2. Bjerhammar A (1963) A new theory of gravimetric geodesy. Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm
3. Heck B (1992) A revision of Helmert's second method of condensation in geoid and quasi-geoid determination. In: Geodesy and physics of the earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 112. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 246-251
4. Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. Freeman WH, San Francisco
5. Martinec A, Vanicek P (1994a) The indirect effect of topography in the Strokes-Helmert technique for a spherical approximation of the geoid. Manuscr Geod 19: 213-219
6. Martinec Z, Vanicek P (1994b) Direct topographical effect of Helmert's condensation for a spherical geoid. Manuscr Geod 19: 257-268
7. Moritz H (1966) Linear solutions of the geodetic boundary-value problem. Rep 79. Department of Geodetic Science. The Ohio State University, Columbus
8. Moritz H (1968) On the use of the terrain correction in solving Molodensky's problem. Rep 108, Department of Geodetic Science. The Ohio State University, Columbus
9. Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Wichmann, Karlsruhe
10. Nahavandchi H (1998) Precise gravimetric-GPS geoid determination with improved topographic corrections applied over Sweden, PhD Thesis. Division of Geodesy Rep 1050, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
11. 3 in gravimetric geoid determination. J Geod 72(3): 124-135
12. Pellinen LP (1962) Accounting for topography in calculation of quasi-geoidal heights and plumb-line deflection from gravity anomalies. Bull Geod 63: 57-65
13. Sjöberg LE (1975) On the discrete boundary value problem of physical geodesy with harmonic reductions to an internal sphere. The Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Geodesy, Stockholm
14. Sjöberg LE (1977) On the errors of spherical harmonic developments of gravity at the surface of the earth. Rep 257, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
15. Sjöberg LE (1978) A comparison of Bjerhammar's methods and collocation in physical geodesy. Rep 273, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus
16. Sjöberg LE (1980) On the convergence problem for the spherical harmonic expansion of the geopotential at the surface of the Earth. Boll Geod Sci Aff 39(3): 261-271
17. Sjöberg LE (1984) On the convergence problem for the satellite derived spherical harmonic expansion of the geopotential at the Earth's surface. Proc 5th Int Symp on Geodesy and Physics of the Earth. Magdeburg, Germany, part II, pp 108-114
18. Sjöberg LE (1994a) The total terrain effects in the modified Stokes' formula. In, Sünkel H, Marson I (eds) Gravity and geoid. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 113. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 616-623
19. Sjöberg LE (1994b) On the terrain effects in geoid and quasigeoid determinations using Helmert's second condensation method. Division of Geodesy Res Rep 36, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
20. Sjöbers LE (1995) On the quasigeoid to geoid separation. Manuscr Geod 20 182-192
21. Sjöberg LE (1996a) On the error of analytical continuation in physical geodesy. J Geod 70: 724-730
22. Sjöberg LE (1996b) The terrain effect in geoid computation from satellite derived geopotential models. Boll Geod Sci Aff 55: 385-392
23. Sjöberg LE (1998) The exterior Airy Heiskanen topographic-isostatic gravity potential, anomaly and the effect of analytical continuation in Stokes' formula. J Geod 72: 654-662
24. Sjöberg LE (1999) On the downward continuation error at the Earth's surface and the geoid of satellite derived geopotential models. Boll Geod Sci Aff 58: 215-229
25. Sjöberg LE (submitted) The effect of downward continuation of gravity anomaly to sea level in Stokes formula. J Geod
26. Sjöberg LE, Nahavandchi H (1999) The indirect effect in geoid determination by the Stokes-Helmert method. J Geod 73: 87-93
27. Sun W, Sjöberg LE (submitted) Binomial expansions in isostatic compensations and terrain corrections. J Geod
28. Sun W, Vanicek P (1998) On some problems of the downward continuation of the 5′ × 5′ mean Helmert gravity disturbance. J Geod 72: 411-420
29. Vanicek P, Kleusberg A (1987) The Canadian geoid - Stokesian approach. Manuscr Geod 12: 86-98
30. Vanicek P, Sun W, Ong R, Martineck Z, Vadja R, Horst B (1996) Downward continuation of Helmert's gravity. J Geod 71: 21-34
31. Wang YM, Rapp RH (1990) Terrain effects on geoid undulation computations. Manuscr Geod 15: 23-29
32. Wichiencharoen G (1982) The indirect effects on the computation of geoid undulations. Rep 336, Dept of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus