Downward continuation of Helmert's gravity

Journal of Geodesy

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 21-34

  Vanicek P ^a   Sun, W ^a,d   Ong, P ^a   Martinec, Z ^b   Najafi, M ^a   Vajda, P ^a   Ter Horst, B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^d ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTH SURFACE; GEOID; GRAVITY; HELMERT'S GRAVITY;

CANADA, ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

EID: 0030437312     PISSN: 09497714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001900050072     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bjerhammar, A., 1962, Gravity reduction to a spherical surface, Report of the Royal Institute of Technology, Geodesy Division, Stockholm.
2. Bjerhammar, A., 1976, A Dirac approach to physical geodesy, Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, 101,41-44.
3. Forsberg, R., 1984. Gravity field terrain effect computations by FFT, Bull. Géod. 59, 342-360.
4. Gruber, T. and M. Anzenhofer, 1993, The GFZ 360 gravity field model, the European geoid determination, Proceedings of session G3, European Geophysical Society XVIII General Assembly, Wiesbaden. May 3-7, 1993, published by the geodetic division of KMS, Copenhagen. Eds. R. Forsberg and H. Denker.
5. Heiskanen, W.H., and H. Moritz, 1967, Physical Geodesy, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
6. Kellogg, O.D. 1929. Foundations of Potential Theory. Springer, Berlin (reprinted 1967).
7. MacMillan, W.D., 1930, The Theory of the Potential. Dover reprint, 1958.
8. Martinec, Z. and P. Vaníček, 1994, Direct topographical effect of Helmert's condensation for a spherical approximation of the geoid, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 19, 257-268.
9. Molodenskij, M.S., V.F. Eremeev and M.I. Yurkina, 1960, Methods for Study of the External Gravitational Field and Figure of the Earth, English translation by Israel Programme for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, for Office of Technical Services, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1962.
10. Moritz, H., 1980, Advanced Physical Geodesy, H. Wichmann Verlag Karlsruhe.
11. Sjöberg, L.E., 1984, Least squares modification of Stokes' and Vening Meinesz' formulas by accounting for truncation and potential coefficient errors, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 9, 209-229.
12. Vaníček, P. and E.J. Krakiwsky, 1986, Geodesy: the concepts, (2nd corrected edition). North Holland, Amsterdam.
13. Vaníček, P. and A. Kleusberg, 1987, The Canadian geoid-Stokesian approach, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 12, 86-98.
14. Vaníček, P. and L.E. Sjöberg, 1991, Reformulation of Stokes's Theory for Higher than Second-Degree Reference Field and a Modification of Integration Kernels, JGR 96 (B4), 6529-6539.
15. Vaníček, P. and Z. Martinec, 1994, The Stokes-Helmert Scheme for the Evaluation of a Precise Geoid, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 19, 119-128.
16. Wichiencharoen, C., 1982, The indirect effects on the computation of geoid undulations, Department of Geodetic Science, Rep. #336, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.