Similarity and attribution in concept combination: Reply to Wisniewski

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-40

  Estes, Zachary ^a   Gucksberg, Sam ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARTIFACT; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; NOTE;

EID: 0034003819     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211574     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. ESTES, Z., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (2000). Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory & Cognition, 28, 28-34.
2. GENTNER, D., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158.
3. GOODMAN, N. (1972). Problems and projects. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
4. MURPHY, G. L. (1988). Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science, 12, 529-562.
5. WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 167-183.
6. WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (2000). Similarity, alignment, and conceptual combination: Comment on Estes and Glucksberg. Memory & Cognition, 28, 35-38.