Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: Adaptation to scale change

Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 461-473

  Ferrel, C ^a   Leifflen, D ^b   Orliaguet, J P ^a   Coello, Y ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHES   (France)

^c UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Kinematic analysis; Pointing movement; Remote control; Scale change; Spatial accuracy; Video display

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR SYSTEM; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT; VISUAL INFORMATION;

FEEDBACK; KINEMATICS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; VIDEO CAMERAS; VISION;

KINESTHETIC SYSTEMS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 0034003586     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401300184341     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., MEYER, D. E. and KORNBLUM, S. 1990, Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 248-267.
2. BEAUBATON, D. and HAY, L. 1986, Contribution of visual information to feedforward and processes in rapid pointing movements, Human Movement Science, 5, 19-34.
3. BONNET, M., REQUIN, J. and STELMACH, G. 1982, Specification of direction and extent in motor programming, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 31-34.
4. COELLO, Y. 1993, Controle spatio-temporel du mouvement, Analyse cinematique d’un mouvement de pointage perturbe par un champ artificiel de forces gravito-inertielles. Cognitive Psychology doctorate, University P. Mendies France, Grenoble.
5. COELLO, Y. and ORLIAGUET, J.-P. 1994, Spatial adaptation of fast pointing movement to inertial perturbation: evidence for differential adjustment of amplitude and direction, Current Psychology of Cognition, 12, 247-265.
6. COELLO, Y., ORLIAGUET, J. P. and PRABLANC, C. 1996, Pointing movement in an artificial perturbing inertial field: a prospective paradigm for motor control study, Neuropsycho-logia, 34, 879-892.
7. COELLO, Y., ORLIAGUET, J. P., PRABLANC, C. and BARRAUD, P. A. 1997, Subjective position sense of hand location in an inertial pointing task: a test for feedback processing?, Current Psychology of Cognition, 15, 85-608.
8. CUNNINGHAM, H. 1989, Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 493-506.
9. ELLIOTT, D. and ALLARD, F. 1985, The utilisation of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 407-425.
10. EPPS, D. 1986, Comparison of six cursor control devices based on Fitts’ law model, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 30th Annual Meeting. (Santa Monica: Human Factors Society, Inc.), 327-330.
11. FAVILLA, M., GORDON, J., HENING, W. and GHEZ, C. 1990, Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VII. Independent setting of amplitude and direction in response preparation, Behavioural Brain Research, 79, 530-538.
12. FAVILLA, M., HENING, W. and GHEZ, C. 1989, Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. VI. Independent specification of response amplitude and direction, Behavioural Brain Research, 75, 280-294.
13. FLEURY, M., BARD, C., AUDIFFREN, M., TEASDALE, N. and BLOUIN, J. 1994, The attentional cost of amplitude and directional requirements when pointing to targets, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 481-495.
14. GEORGOPOULOS, A. P., CAMINITI, R., KALASKA, J. F. and MASSEY, J. T. 1983, Spatial coding of movement: a hypothesis concerning the coding of movement direction by motor cortical populations, Experimental Brain Research Supplement, 7, 161-166.
15. IMAMIZU, H. and SHIMOJO, S. 1995, The locus of visual-motor mapping at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 719-733.
16. LARISH, D. D. and FREKANY, G. A. 1985, Planning and preparing expected and unexpected movements: reexamining the relationships of arm, direction, and extent of movement, Journal of Motor Behaviour, 17, 168-189.
17. Li Lin, M.-L., Radwin, G. R. and Vanderheiden, G. C. 1992, Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device, Ergonomics, 35, 159-175.
18. M EYER, D. E., ABRAMS, R. A., KORNBLUM, S., WRIGHT, C. E. and SMITH, J. E. K. 1988, Optimality in human motor performance: Ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychological Review, 95, 340-370.
19. PRABLANC, C., ECHALLIER, J. E., JEANNEROD, M. and KOMILIS, E. 1979, Optimal response of eye and hand motor systems in pointing at a visual target. II. Static and dynamic visual cues in the control of hand movement, Biological Cybernetics, 35, 183-187.
20. Radwin, G. R., Vanderheiden, G. C. and Li Lin, M.-L. 1990, A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices for disabled persons using Fitts’ law, Human Factors, 32, 423-438.
21. REINHARDT-RUTLAND, A. 1996, Remote operation: a selective review of research into visual depth perception, Journal of General Psychology, 123, 237-248.
22. RIEHLE, A. and REQUIN, J. 1989, Monkey primary motor and premotor cortex: single cell activity related to prior information about direction and extent of an intended movement, Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 534-549.
23. ROSENBAUM, D. A. 1980, Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
24. SMITH, T. and SMITH, K. 1990, Human factors of workstation telepresence, in S. Griffin (ed.), Third Annual Workshop on SOAR’89 (Houston: NASA Conference Publ.), 235-250.