What is noise for the motion system?

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 16, 1996, Pages 2579-2586

  Scase, Mark O ^a,b   Braddick, Oliver J ^a   Raymond, Jane E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coherence threshold; Motion perception; Random dot displays; Visual noise

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

EID: 0030221169     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00325-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baker C.L., Braddick O.J. Temporal properties of the short range process in apparent motion. Perception. 14:1985;181-192.
2. Baker C.L., Braddick O.J. Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception. Vision Research. 25:1985;803-812.
3. Baker C.L., Hess R.F., Zihl J. Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience. 11:1991;454-461.
4. Blake R., Hiris E. Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research. 33:1993;1589-1592.
5. Braddick O.J. A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research. 14:1974;519-527.
6. Braddick O.J., Smith E., Scase M.O. Spatial incoherence increases visible persistence of moving dots. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 35:1994;1389.
7. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., Movshon J.A. The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 12:1992;4745-4765.
8. Bullimore M.A., Wood J.M., Swenson K. Motion perception in glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 34:1993;3526-3533.
9. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Temporal properties of the detectability of moving white noise. Experimental Brain Research. 45:1982;179-188.
10. Downing C.J., Movshon A.J. Spatial and temporal summation in the detection of motion in stochastic random dot displays. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 30((Suppl.)):1989;72.
11. van de Grind W.A., van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Detection of coherent motion in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 73:1983;1674-1683.
12. Mikami A., Newsome W.T., Wurtz R.H. Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1 Journal of Neurophysiology. 55:1986;1328-1339.
13. Morgan M.J., Fahle M. Effects of pattern element density upon displacement limits for motion detection in random binary luminance patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 248:1992;189-198.
14. Newsome W.T., Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion processing following lesions of the middle temporal area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience. 8:1988;2201-2211.
15. Silverman S.E., Trick G.L., Hart W.M. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 31:1990;722-729.
16. Snowden R.J., Braddick O.J. Extension of displacement limits in multi-exposure sequences of apparent motion. Vision Research. 29:1989;1777-1787.
17. Snowden R.J., Braddick O.J. Differences in the processing of short-range apparent motion at small and large displacements. Vision Research. 30:1990;1211-1222.
18. Watamaniuk S.N.J. Ideal observer for the discrimination of the global direction of random-dot stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America (A). 10:1993;16-28.
19. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R., Williams D.W. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays - the integration of direction information. Vision Research. 29:1989;47-59.
20. Williams D.W., Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research. 24:1984;55-62.