Gradients as Visual Primitives

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 370-387

  Goodenough, Belinda ^a   Gillam, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031114835     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.370     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Braddick, O. J., & Holliday, I. E. (1991). Serial search for targets defined by convergence or deformation of optic flow. Perception, 20, 345-354.
2. Braunstein, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 247-253.
3. Clark, W. C., Smith, A. H., & Rabe, A. (1956). The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and ground in the perception of slant. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10, 1-8.
4. Cutting, J. E., & Millard, R. T. (1984). Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 198-216.
5. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
6. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psychological Science, 1, 323-326.
7. Fahle, M. (1991). Parallel perception of vernier offsets, curvature, and chevrons in humans. Vision Research, 31, 2149-2184.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Gillam, B. (1970). Judgments of slant on the basis of foreshortening. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11, 31-34.
11. Gillam, B. (1981). False perspectives. Perception, 10, 313-318.
12. Gillam, B., Chambers, D., & Russo., T. (1988). Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 163-175.
13. Gillam, B., & Ryan, C. (1992). Perceptive, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception, 21, 427-439.
14. Gillam, B. J. (1968). Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 297-305.
15. Goodenough, B. J. (1992). Searching for a difference in orientation: Implications for models of visual search. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
16. Holliday, I. E., & Braddick, O. J. (1988). Visual search for targets differing in divergence or shear is serial. Perception, 18, 403.
17. Howard, I. P., & Kaneko, H. (1994). Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Research, 34, 2505-2517.
18. Lappin, J. S., Ahlström, U. B., Craft, W. D., & Tschantz, S. T. (1994). Spatial primitives for seeing 3-D shape from motion. In T. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, & E. Kowler (Eds.), Early vision and beyond (pp. 145-153). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Mitchison, G. J., & McKee, S. P. (1990). Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception. Vision Research, 30, 1781-1791.
20. Moraglia, G. (1989). Display organization and the detection of horizontal line elements. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 265-272.
21. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264-265.
22. Nakayama, K., Silverman, G. H., MacLeod, D. I., & Mulligan, J. (1985). Sensitivity to shearing and compressive motion in random dots. Perception, 14, 225-238.
23. Nothdurft, H.-C. (1985). Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation. Vision Research, 25, 551-560.
24. Nothdurft, H.-C. (1991a). The role of local contrast in pop-out of orientation, motion and color. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 32, 714.
25. Nothdurft, H.-C. (1991b). Texture segmentation and pop-out form orientation contrast. Vision Research, 31, 1073-1078.
26. Purdy, W. C. (1960). The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception. Ithaca, NY: General Electric Advanced Electronics Center.
27. Quinlan, P. T., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape and size: An examination of the constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 455-472.
28. Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science, 221, 1409-1411.
29. Rosinski, R. R., & Levine, N. P. (1976). Texture gradient effectiveness in the perception of surface slant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 261-271.
30. Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 21-1-21-57). New York: Wiley.
31. Stevens, K. A. (1981). The information content of texture gradients. Biological Cybernetics, 42, 95-105.
32. Stevens, K. A. (1984). On gradients and "texture" gradients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 217-220.
33. Treisman, A. M. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 156-177.
34. Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
35. Treisman, A. M., Cavanagh, P., Fischer, B., Ramachandran, V. S., & von der Heydt, R. (1990). Form perception and attention: Striate cortex and beyond. In L. Spillman & B. Wootton (Eds.), Visual perception: The neurophysiological foundations (pp. 273-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
37. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
38. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
39. Treisman, A. M., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
40. Treisman, A. M., Sykes, M., & Gelade, G. (1977). Selective attention and stimulus integration. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 327-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Vickers, D. (1971). Perceptual economy and the impression of visual depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 23-27.
42. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.
43. Wolfe, J. M., & Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992). Part-whole relationships in visual search. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Abstracts, 33, 1355.