Accommodation microfluctuations and pupil size during sustained viewing of visual display terminals

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-10

  Gray, L S ^a   Gilmartin, B ^b   Winn, B ^c  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; VISION; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER TERMINALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUPIL; READING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033988292     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(99)00030-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexandridis, E. (1985). The Pupil, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Burns D.H. Characteristics of visual display terminals that may cause visual difficulties. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 15:1998;99-104.
3. Campbell F.W., Durden K. The visual display terminal issue: a consideration of its physiological, psychological and clinical background. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 3:1983;175-192.
4. Campbell F.W., Robson J.G., Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. J. Physiol. 145:1959;579-594.
5. Charman W.N., Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 8:1988;153-164.
6. Collins G. The electronic refractometer. Brit. J. Physiol. Opt. 1:1937;30-40.
7. Collins M., Davis B., Atchison D. VDT screen reflections and accommodation response. Review Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 14:1994;193-198.
8. Chauhan K., Charman W.N. Accommodation responses to flickering stimuli. review. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;391-408.
9. Collins M., Davis B., Wood J. Microfluctuations of steady-state accommodation and the cardiopulmonary system. Vision Res. 35:1995;2491-2502.
10. Davis B., Collins M., Atchison D. Calibration of the Canon Autoref R-1 for continuous measurement of accommodation. review. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 13:1993;191-198.
11. Geacintov T., Peavler W.S. Pupillography in industrial fatigue assessment. J. Applied Psychol. 59:1974;213-216.
12. Gilmartin, B., Ukai, K., Winn, B. and Phillips, N. (1990). Accommodative adaptation to near vision: is there a pupil corollary?. In: Transactions of the Frontiers of Vision 10th Anniversary Conference, British College of Optometrists/Butterworths, London.
13. Goldwater B.C. Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychol. Bull. 77:1972;340-355.
14. Goussard Y., Martin B., Stark L. A new quantitative indicator of visual fatigue. IEEE Trans. Biomed. En. BME-34:1987;23-29.
15. Gray L.S., Winn B., Gilmartin B. Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter. Vision Res. 33:1993;2083-2090.
16. Gray L.S., Winn B., Gilmartin B. The effect of target luminance on the microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 13:1993;258-265.
17. Iwasaki T., Kurimoto S. Objective evaluation of eyestrain using measurements of accommodative oscillation. Ergonomics. 30:1987;581-587.
18. Jaschinski W., Bonacker M., Alshuth E. Accommodation, convergence, pupil diameter and eye blinks at a CRT display flickering near fusion limit. Ergonomics. 39:1996;152-164.
19. Jaschinski-Kruza W. On the preferred viewing distances to screen and document at VDU workplaces. Ergonomics. 33:1990;1055-1065.
20. Jaschinski-Kruza W. Eyestrain in VDU users: Viewing distance and the resting position of the ocular muscles. Human Factors. 33:1991;69-83.
21. Jaschinski-Kruza W. Fixation disparity at different distances of a visual display terminal. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 13:1993;27-33.
22. Jaschinski-Kruza W., Schubert-Alshuth E. Variability of fixation disparity and accommodation when viewing a CRT visual display terminal. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 12:1992;411-419.
23. Lee J.H., Stark L.R., Cohen S., Kruger P.B. Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of slurred retinal images. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 19:1999;223-235.
24. Martin D.K., Dain S.J. Postural modifications of VDU operators wearing bifocal spectacles. Applied Ergonomics. 19:1988;293-300.
25. Östberg, O. (1980). Accommodation and visual fatigue in display work. ed. E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani. In: Ergonomic Aspects of Visual Display Terminals, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 41-52.
26. Owens D.A., Wolf-Kelly K. Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Invest. Ophthal. Visual Sci. 28:1987;743-749.
27. Pugh J.R., Winn B. Modification of the Canon Autoref R-1 for use as a continuously recording optometer. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 8:1988;460-464.
28. Pugh J.R., Winn B. A procedural guide to the modification of the Canon Autoref R-1 for use as a continuously recording optometer. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 9:1989;451-454.
29. Pugh J.R., Eadie A.S., Winn B., Heron G. Power spectrum analysis in the study of ocular mechanisms. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 7:1987;321-324.
30. Sheedy, J. E. and Saladin, J. J. (1983). Validity of diagnostic criteria and case analysis in binocular vision disorders. ed. C. M. Schor and K. J. Ciuffreda. In: Vergence Eye Movements: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Butterworths, Boston, USA, pp. 517-540.
31. Tsuchiya K., Ukai K., Ishikawa S. A quasistatic study of pupil and accommodation after-effects following near vision. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 9:1989;385-391.
32. Tyrrell R.A., Liebowitz H.W. The relation of vergence effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near work. Human Factors. 32:1990;341-357.
33. Ukai K., Tsuchiya K., Ishikawa S. Induced pupillary hippus following near vision: increased occurrence in visual display terminal workers. Ergonomics. 40:1997;1201-1211.
34. Wetzel P.A., Geri G.A., Pierce B.J. An integrated system for measuring static and dynamic accommodation with a Canon Autoref R-1 refractometer. review. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 16:1996;520-527.
35. Winn B., Gilmartin B. Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 12:1992;252-256.
36. Winn B., Pugh J.R., Gilmartin B., Owens H. The effect of pupil size on static and dynamic measurements of accommodation using an infra-red optometer. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 9:1989;277-283.
37. Winn B., Pugh J.R., Gilmartin B., Owens H. Arterial pulse modulates steady state ocular accommodation. Current Eye Res. 9:1990;971-975.