Benign diagnosis by image-guided core-needle breast biopsy

American Surgeon

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-10

  Duncan III, James L ^a   Cederbom, Gunnar J ^a   Champaign, Judy L ^a   Smetherman, Dana H ^a   King, Tari A ^a   Farr, Gist H ^a   Waring, Alexia N ^a   Bolton, John S ^a   Fuhrman, George M ^a,b  

^a OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATIENT MONITORING; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033988092     PISSN: 00031348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Cancer Society. Mammographic guidelines 1983: Background, asymptomatic women aged 40-49. Ca Cancer J Clinicians 1983;33:255.
2. Bigelow R, Smith R, Goodman PA, Wilson GS. Needle localization of nonpalpable breast masses. Arch Surg 1985;120: 565-9.
3. Lefor AT, Numann PJ, Levinsohn EM. Needle localization of occult breast lesions. Am J Surg 1984;148:270-4.
4. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. Open versus stereotactic breast biopsy. Am J Surg 1996;172:491-5.
5. Petrovich JA, Ross DS, Sullivan JW, Lake TP. Mammographic wire localization in diagnosis and treatment of occult carcinoma of breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:239-43.
6. Kaelin CM, Smith TJ, Homer MJ, et al. Safety, accuracy, and diagnostic yield of needle localization biopsy of the breast performed using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:267-72.
7. Cross MJ, Evans WP, Peters GN, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1995;2:195-200.
8. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr, Nowels KW. Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: Comparisons of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques. AJR 1998;171:1325-30.
9. Howisey RL, Acheson MB, Rowbotham RK, Morgan A. A comparison of Medicare reimbursement and results for various imaging-guided breast biopsy techniques. Am J Surg 1997;173: 395-8.
10. Israel PZ, Fine RE. Stereotactic needle biopsy for occult breast lesions: A minimally invasive alternative. Am Surg 1995; 61:87-91.
11. Azavedo E, Svane G, Auer G. Stereotactic fine-needle biopsy in 2594 mammographically detected non-palpable lesions. Lancet 1989;1:1033-6.
12. Burns RP. Image-guided breast biopsy. Am J Surg 1997; 173:9-13.
13. Burbank F. Mammographic findings after 14-gauge automated needle and 14-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsies. Radiology 1997;204:153-6.
14. Bender JS, Magnuson TH, Smith-Meek MA, et al. Will stereotactic breast biopsy achieve results as good as current techniques? Am Surg 1996;62:637-40.
15. Pitre B, Baron PL, Baron LF, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy of the breast: Results of one-year follow-up of 101 patients. Am Surg 1997;63:1124-7.
16. Head JF, Haynes AE, Elliott MC, Elliott RL. Stereotaxic localization and core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: Two-year follow-up of a prospective study. Am Surg 1996;62: 1018-23.
17. Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998; 227:932-9.
18. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: Benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688-700.
19. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 3rd Ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.
20. Fuhrman GM, Cederbom G, Champagne J, et al. Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic technique to assess nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. J La State Med Soc 1996;148:167-70.