Coping with change: Intellectual property rights, new legislation, and the human mutation database initiative

Human Mutation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 22-29

  Maurer, Stephen M ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Copyright; Intellectual property; Legal; MDI; Mutation database

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; EUROPE; GENE MUTATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAW; PATENT; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; EUROPEAN UNION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MUTATION; PRIVATE SECTOR; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033987837     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<22::AID-HUMU7>3.0.CO;2-Q     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ashburner M. 1996. Central Database Working Group Discussion Paper. http://ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au:80/~cotton/ central.htm
2. Heller M, Eisenberg R. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The Anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280:698.
3. Incyte Pharmaceuticals. 1998. Advanced tools for researching public domain data. Incyte.
4. Kaiser J. 1996. Treaty on database access stalled. Science 274:1999.
5. Lehveslaiho H, Ashburner M, Etzold T. 1998. Unified access to mutation databases. Trends Genet 14:205-206.
6. Lohr J. 1999. Public testimony. In: Striking a balance: private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical data-bases. Workshop proceedings, National Research Council. http://www.nas.edu
7. Maurer S. 1999. Raw knowledge: protecting technical databases for science and industry. In: Striking a balance: private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases. Workshop proceedings, National Research Council. www.nas.edu
8. Maurer S, Scotchmer S. 1999. Database protection: is it broken and should we fix it? Science 284:1129.
9. Overton C. 1999. Public testimony. In: Striking a balance: private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases. Workshop proceedings, National Research Council. www.nas.edu
10. Reichman J, Uhlir P. 1999. Database protection at the crossroads. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 14:793.
11. Scotchmer S. 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law. J Econ Perspect 5:29.
12. Scriver C, Nowacki P, Hehvaslaiho H. 1999. Guidelines and recommendations for content, structure and deployment of mutation databases. Hum Mutat 13:344-350.
13. Williams M. 1999. Public testimony. In: Striking a balance: private rights and the public interest in scientific and technical databases. Workshop proceedings, National Research Council. www.nas.edu