Guidelines and recommendations for content, structure, and deployment of mutation databases: II. Journey in progress

Human Mutation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 13-15

  Scriver, Charles R ^a   Nowacki, Piotr M ^a   Lehväslaiho, Heikki ^b   Antonarakis, S ^c   Beroud, C ^c   Brown, A ^c   Cooper, D N ^c   Cotton, R G H ^c   Den Dunnen, J T ^c   Fujiwara, M ^c   Krawczak, M ^c   Reeve, M P ^c   Shimizu, N ^c   Sicotte, H ^c   Tyfield, L ^c   Van Ommen, G J ^c   Nihenen, M ^c   Wjst, M ^c  

^a MONTREAL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Gene; Genome; Informatics; MDI; Mutation database

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; NOMENCLATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; MUTATION; TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 0033986099     PISSN: 10597794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<13::AID-HUMU5>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Antonarakis SE, the Nomenclature Working Group. 1998. Recommendations for a nomenclature system for human gene mutations. Hum Mutat 11:1-3.
2. Béroud C, Collod-Béroud G, Boileau C, Soussi T, Junien C. 2000. UMD (universal mutation database): a generic software to build and analyze locus-specific databases. Hum Mutat 15:86-94.
3. Brown AF, McKie MA. 2000. MuStaR and other software for locus-specific mutation databases. Hum Mut 15:76-85.
4. Cotton RGH, McKusick V, Scriver CR. 1998. The HUGO Mutation Database Initiative. Science 279:10-11.
5. Cuticchia AJ. 2000. Future vision of the GDB Human Genome Database. Hum Mutat 15:62-67.
6. den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE. 2000. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat 15:7-12.
7. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, Valle D, McKusick VA. 2000. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Hum Mutat 15:57-61.
8. Horaitis O, Cotton RGH. 1999. Human mutation databases. Unit 7.11.1-7.11-11. Current protocols in human genetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Horaitis O, Scriver CR, Cotton RG. 1999. Mutation databases: overview and catalogues in the metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease, 8th ed. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly W, Valle D, editors. New York: McGraw Hill (in press).
10. Jennings EG, Young RA. 1999. Genome expression on the world wide web. Trends Genet 15:202-204.
11. Krawczak M, Ball EV, Fenton I, Stenson PD, Abeysinghe S, Thomas N, Cooper DN. 2000. The human gene mutation database: a biomedical information and research resource. Hum Mutat 15:45-51.
12. Lehväslaiho H, Ashburner M, Etzold T. 1998. Unified access to mutation database. Trends Genet 14:205-206.
13. Lehväslaiho H, Stupka E, Ashburner M. 2000. The sequence variation database project at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Hum Mutat 15:52-56.
14. Maurer SM. 2000. Coping with change: intellectual property rights, new legislation, and the human mutations database initiative. Hum Mutat 15: 22-29.
15. Maurer SM, Scotchmer S. 1999. Database protection: is it broken and should we fix it. Science 284:1129-1130.
16. Minoshima S, Mitsuyama S, Ohno S, Kawamura T, Shimizu N. 2000. Eye disorder database " KMeyeDB." Hum Mutat 15:95-98.
17. Portet CJ, Talbott CC, Jr, Cuticchia AJ. 2000. Central mutation databases - a review. Hum Mutat 15:36-44.
18. Scriver CR, Nowacki PM. 1999. Genomes, mutations and the internet. The naming of parts. J Inherit Metab Dis 22:519-550.
19. Scriver CR, Nowacki PM, Lehväslaiho H. 1999. Guidelines and recommendations for content, structure, and deployment of mutation databases. Hum Mutat 13:344-350.
20. Soussi T, Dehouche K, Béroud C. 2000. The p53 mutation database. Hum Mutat 15:105-113.
21. Wolfe KH, Sharpe PM, Li W-H. 1989. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Natute 337:283-285.