Suggestion difficulty as a hypothesized moderator of the relation between absorption and suggestibility: A new spectral analysis

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 32-43

  Kirsch, Irving ^a   Milling, Leonard S ^b   Burgess, Cheryl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; MALE; META ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0033980381     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140008410359     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Balthazard, C. G., & Woody, E. Z. (1992). The spectral analysis of hypnotic performance with respect to "absorption." International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 21-43.
2. Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 35-46.
3. Bowers, P. G., Laurence, J.-R., & Hart, D. (1982). A group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Revision and expansion of Form C. (ASIS-NAPS Document No. 04632). New York: National Auxiliary Publications Service.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Council, J. R. (1999). Measures of hypnotic responding. In I. Kirsch, A. Capafons, E. Cardeña, & S. Amigó (Eds.), Clinical hypnosis and self-regulation therapy: Cognitive-behavioral perspectives (pp. 119-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Kirsch, I., Burgess, C. A., & Braffman, W. (1999). Attentional resources in hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 175-191.
7. Kirsch, I., Silva, C. E., Comey, G., & Reed, S. (1995). Aspectral analysis of cognitive and personality variables in hypnosis: Empirical disconfirmation of the two-factor model of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 167-175.
8. Nadon, R. (1997). What this field needs is a good nomological network. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 45, 314-323.
9. Roche, S., & McConkey, K. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 91-101.
10. Shor, R. E., & Orne, M. T. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
11. Shor, R. E., Orne, M. T., & O'Connell, D. N. (1962). Validation and cross-validation of a scale of self-reported personal experiences which predicts hypnotizability. Journal of Psychology, 53, 55-75.
12. Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Bertrand, L. D., Stam, H. J., & Moretti, P. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Relationship with other measures of hypnotic susceptibility, expectancies, and absorption. Psychological Reports, 53, 723-734.
13. Tellegen, A. (1978-1979). On measures and conceptions of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 219-237.
14. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
15. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
16. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Wenk, H., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1997, November). Spectral analysis of absorption and hypnotic response. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Washington, DC.
18. Woody, E. Z., Drugovic, M., & Oakman, J. M. (1997). A reexamination of the role of nonhypnotic suggestibility in hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 399-407.