What this field needs is a good nomological network

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 314-323

  Nadon, Robert ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; PSYCHIATRY;

EID: 0030955983     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207149708416132     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bowers, K. S. (1993). The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Normative and comparative data. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 35-46.
2. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
3. Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Grant, D. L. (1996). Imagining, expectancy, and hypnotic responding. In R. G. Kunzendorf, N. P., Spanos, & B. J. Wallace (Eds.), Hypnosis and imagination (pp. 41-65). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
4. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
5. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
7. Jones, M. B., & Fennel, R. S. (1965). Runway performance in two strains of rats. Florida Academy of Sciences, 28, 289-296.
8. Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846-858.
9. Lykken, D. T. (1991). What's wrong with psychology anyway? In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Matters of public interest: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl: Vol. 1. Matters of public interest (pp. 3-39). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Nadon, R., Laurence, J.-R., & Perry, C. (1987). Multiple predictors of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 948-960.
11. Perry, C., Nadon, R., & Button, J. (1992). The measurement of hypnotic ability. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 459-490). New York: Guilford.
12. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 289-295.
13. Rescorla, R. A. (1987). A Pavlovian analysis of goal-directed behavior. American Psychologist, 42, 119-129.
14. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
15. Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53, 523-535.
16. Spiegel, H., Aronson, M., Fleiss, J. L., & Haber, J. (1976). Psychometric analysis of the Hypnotic Induction Profile. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 24, 300-315.
17. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: Preliminary proposal. (1954). Psychological Bulletin Supplement, 51, 1-38.
18. Tellegen, A. (1981). Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: Comment on "Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention" by Qualls and Sheehan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 217-226.
19. Tellegen, A. (1991). Personality traits: Issues of definition, evidence, and assessment. In D. Cicchetti & W. G. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology: Essays in honor of Paul E. Meehl, Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 10-35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128-134.
21. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
22. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23. Woody, E. Z., Bowers, K. S., & Oakman, J. M. (1992). A conceptual analysis of hypnotic responsiveness: Experience, individual differences, and context. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 3-33). New York: Guilford.
24. Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159-1177.