Mathematical model for early development of the sea urchin embryo

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 37-59

  Ciliberto, Andrea ^a   Tyson, John J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CYCLIN B; MATURATION PROMOTING FACTOR; PROTEIN KINASE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLASTOMERE; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOPLASM; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEA URCHIN; SOMATIC CELL; XENOPUS;

ANIMALIA; ECHINOIDEA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 0033968499     PISSN: 00928240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bulm.1999.0129     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agrell I. A mitotic gradient as the cause of the early differentiation in the sea urchin embryo. Wingstrand K. G. Zoological Papers in Honour of B. Hanstrom. 1956;27-34 Lund, Sweden.
2. Agrell I. Natural division synchrony and mitotic gradients in metazoan tissues. Zeuthen E. Synchrony in Cell Division and Growth. 1964;39-67 Wiley Interscience, New York.
3. Andreuccetti P., Barone Lumaga M. R., Cafiero G., Filosa S., Parisi E. Cell junctions during the early development of the sea urchin embryo Paracentrotus lividus. Cell Differ. 20:1987;137-146.
4. Andreuccetti P., Filosa S., Monroy A., Parisi E. Cell-cell interactions and the role of micromeres in the control of the mitotic pattern in sea urchin embryo. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. B85:1982;21-29.
5. Clarke P. R., Hoffmann I., Draetta G., Karsenti E. Dephosphorylation of cdc25-C by a type-2A protein phosphatase: specific regulation during the cell cycle in Xenopus extracts. Mol. Biol. Cell. 4:1993;397-411.
6. Dasso M., Newport J. W. Completion of DNA replication is monitored by a feedback system that controls the initiation of mitosis in vitro: studies in Xenopus. Cell. 61:1990;811-823.
7. Edgar B. A., Kiehle C. P., Schubiger G. Cell cycle control by the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio in early Drosophila development. Cell. 44:1986;365-372.
8. Giudice G. Developmental Biology of the Sea Urchin Embryo. 1973;Academic Press, New York.
9. Hagstrom B. E., Lonning S. Time-lapse and electron microscopic studies of sea urchin micromeres. Protoplasma. 68:1969;271-288.
10. Hartley R. S., Rempel R. E., Maller J. L. In vivo regulation of the early embryonic cell cycle in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 173:1996;408-419.
11. Horstadius S. Experimental Embryology of Echinoderms. 1973;Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. King W. R., Deshaies R. J., Peters J., Kirschner M. W. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science. 274:1996;1652-1659.
13. Kominami T., Takaichi M. Unequal division at the third cleavage increase the number of primary mesenchyme cells in sea urchin embryos. Dev. Growth Differ. 40:1998;545-553.
14. Kumagai A., Guo Z., Emami K. H., Wang S. X., Dunphy W. G. The Xenopus Chk1 protein kinase mediates a caffeine-sensitive pathway of checkpoint control in cell-free extracts. J. Cell Biol. 142:1998;1559-1569.
15. Marlovits G., Tyson C. J., Novak B., Tyson J. J. Modeling M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts: the surveillance mechanism of unreplicated DNA. Biophys. Chem. 72:1998;169-184.
16. Mastro A. M., Keith A. D. Diffusion in the aqueous compartment. J. Cell Biol. 99:1984;180s-187s.
17. Masuda M. Species specific pattern of ciliogenesis in developing sea urchin embryos. Dev. Growth Differ. 21:1979;545-552.
18. Masuda M., Sato H. Asynchronization of cell division is concurrently related with ciliogenesis in sea urchin blastulae. Dev. Growth Differ. 26:1984;281-294.
19. Murray A., Hunt T. The Cell Cycle, An Introduction. 1993;Freeman, New York.
20. Nemer M., Stuebing E. W. Wee1-like Cdk tyrosine kinase mRNA level is regulated temporally and spatially in sea urchin embryos. Mech. Dev. 58:1996;75-88.
21. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell. 30:1982a;675-686.
22. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell. 30:1982b;687-696.
23. Novak B., Tyson J. J. Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. J. Cell Sci. 106:1993;1153-1168.
24. O'Connell M. J., Raleigh J. M., Verkade H. M., Nurse P. Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 16:1997;545-554.
25. Parisi E., Filosa S., De Petrocellis B., Monroy A. The pattern of cell division in the early development of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Dev. Biol. 65:1978;38-49.
26. Parisi E., Filosa S., Monroy A. Actinomycin D - disruption of the mitotic gradient in the cleavage stages of the sea urchin embryo. Dev. Biol. 72:1979;167-174.
27. Parisi E., Filosa S., Monroy A. Spatial-temporal coordination of mitotic activity in developing sea urchin embryos. Haken H. Chaos and Order in Nature. 1981;208-215 Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
28. Smythe J. W., Newport J. Coupling of mitosis to the completion of S phase in Xenopus occurs via modulation of the tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates p34cdc2. Cell. 68:1992;787-797.
29. Yasuda G. K., Baker J., Schubiger G. Temporal regulation of gene expression in the blastoderm Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 5:1991;1800-1812.
30. Yasuda G. K., Schubiger G. Temporal regulation in the early embryo: is MBT too good to be true? Trends Genet. 8:1992;124-126.
31. Zubay G. Biochemistry. 1983;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. p. 59.