Photosynthetic sunfleck utilization potential of understory saplings growing under elevated CO2 in FACE

Oecologia

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 163-174

  Naumburg, Elke ^a   Ellsworth, David S ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Elevated CO2; Photosynthetic induction; Shade tolerance; Stomatal conductance; Understory trees

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; LIGHT AVAILABILITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; SAPLING; SHADE TOLERANCE; UNDERSTORY;

ACER RUBRUM; CORNUS FLORIDA; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA; LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0033961262     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/PL00008844     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Baker FS (1949) A revised tolerance table. J For 47:179-181
2. 2, light, and nutrients. Ecology 74:104-112
3. 2. Can J For Res 20:1479-1484
4. Bolker BM, Pacala SW, Bazzaz FA, Canham CD, Levin SA (1995) Species diversity and ecosystem response to carbon dioxide fertilization: conclusions from a temperate forest model. Global Change Biol 1:373-381
5. 2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light. Planta 165:397-406
6. Bunce JA (1992) Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ 15:541-549
7. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America. II. Hardwoods (Agriculture handbook 654). United States Department of Agriculture, Washington
8. Chazdon RL (1988) Sunflecks and their importance to forest understorey plants. Adv Ecol Res 18:1-63
9. Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1986a) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species. I. Induction under constant and fluctuating light conditions. Oecologia 69:517-523
10. Chazdon RL, Pearcy RW (1986b) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species. II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during lightflecks. Oecologia 69:524-531
11. Chen HYH, Klinka K (1997) Light availability and photosynthesis of Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings grown in the open and in the forest understory. Tree Physiol 17:23-29
12. Curtis PS (1996) A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ 19:127-137
13. Davies WJ, Kozlowski TT (1975) Stomatal responses to changes in light intensity as influenced by plant water stress. For Sci 21:129-133
14. 2? Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:609-639
15. 2 enrichment. Commonwealth For Rev 75:39-47
16. Eckstein J, Beyschlag W, Mott KA, Ryel RJ (1996) Changes in photon flux can induce stomatal patchiness. Plant Cell Environ 19:1066-1074
17. 2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ 22:461-472
18. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 104:139-146
19. Ernstsen J, Woodrow IE, Mott KA (1997) Responses of Rubisco activation and deactivation rates to variations in growth-light conditions. Photosynth Res 52:117-125
20. Farquhar GD, Caemmerer S von (1982) Modelling of photosynthetic response to environmental conditions. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology, vol II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 549-587
21. 2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell Environ 18:1214-1225
22. Gendron F, Messier C, Comeau PG (1998) Comparisons of various methods for estimating the mean growing season percent photosynthetic photon flux density in forests. Agric For Meteorol 92:55-70
23. 2: no loss of photosynthetic enhancement. Plant Cell Environ 16:797-807
24. 2 on leaf gas exchange in beech and oak at two levels of nutrient supply: consequences for sensitivity to drought in beech. Plant Cell Environ 20:57-67
25. 2. Global Change Biol 5:293-309
26. 2. Aust J Plant Physiol 23:623-630
27. 2 in trees. Physiol Plant 102:472-480
28. Knapp AK (1992) Leaf gas exchange in Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae): rapid stomatal responses to variability in sunlight in a tree growth form. Am J Bot 79:599-604
29. Knapp AK, Smith WK (1989) Influence of growth form on ecophysiological responses to variable sunlight in subalpine plants. Ecology 70:1069-1082
30. 4 grass. Plant Cell Environ 17:189-195
31. 2. In: Walker B, Steffen W (eds) Global change and terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 20-42
32. Küppers M, Schneider H (1993) Leaf gas exchange of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings in lightflecks: effects of fleck length and leaf temperature in leaves grown in deep and partial shade. Trees 7:160-168
33. Küppers M, Timm H, Orth F, Stegemann J, Stober R, Schneider H, Paliwal K, Karunaichamy KSTK, Ortiz R (1996) Effects of light environment and successional status on lightfleck use by understory trees of temperate and tropical forests. Tree Physiol 16:69-80
34. Kursar TA, Coley PD (1993) Photosynthetic induction times in shade-tolerant species with long and short-lived leaves. Oecologia 93:165-170
35. Lei TT, Lechowicz MJ (1997) The photosynthetic response of eight species of Acer to simulated light regimes from the centre and edges of gaps. Funct Ecol 11:16-23
36. Messier C, Puttonen P (1995) Spatial and temporal variation in the light environment of developing scots pine stands: the basis for a quick and efficient method of characterizing light. Can J For Res 25:343-354
37. Mott KA, Buckley TN (1998) Stomatal heterogeneity. J Exp Bot 49:407-417
38. Oberbauer SF, Clark DB, Clark DA, Quesada MA (1988) Crown light environments of saplings of two species of rainforest emergent trees. Oecologia 75:207-212
39. Ögren E, Sundin U (1996) Photosynthetic responses to variable light: a comparison of species from contrasting habitats. Oecologia 106:18-27
40. 2 concentration increase photosynthesis in forest floor vegetation? Plant Physiol 114:337-344
41. 4 tree species in the understory of a Hawaiian forest. Oecologia 58:19-25
42. Pearcy RW, Chazdon RL, Gross LJ, Mott KA (1994) Photosyn-thetic utilization of sunflecks: a temporally patchy resource on a time scale of seconds to minutes. In: Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 175-208
43. Pearcy RW, Krall JP, Sassenrath-Cole GF (1996) Photosynthesis in fluctuating light environments. In: Baker NR (ed) Photosynthesis and the environment. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 321-346
44. Peet BK, Christensen NL (1980) Succession: a population process. Vegetatio 43:131-140
45. Pepin S, Livingston NJ (1997) Rates of stomatal opening in conifer seedlings in relation to air temperature and daily carbon gain. Plant Cell Environ 20:1462-1472
46. Pereira JS, Kozlowski TT (1977) Influence of light intensity, temperature, and leaf area on stomatal aperture and water potential of woody plants. Can J For Res 7:145-153
47. Poorter L, Oberbauer SF (1993) Photosynthetic induction responses of two rainforest tree species in relation to light environment. Oecologia 96:193-199
48. 2 in seedlings of four co-occurring birch species. Can J For Res 22:1583-1587
49. Roden JS. Pearcy RW (1993) Photosynthetic gas exchange response of poplars to steady-state and dynamic light environments. Oecologia 93:208-214
50. 2: the gas exchange perspective. Photosynth Res 39:351-368
51. 3 species. Plant Physiol 89:590-596
52. 2 exchange under transient light conditions. Plant Physiol 99:227-234
53. 2 atmosphere. New Phytol 139:395-436
54. Schneider H, Paliwal K, Küppers M (1993) Blattgasaustausch in Lichtflecken von Jungpflanzen unterschiedicher sukzesssionaler Stellung aus dem Unterwuchs eines mitteleuropäischen Buchenwaldes - eine analytische Grundlage für die Ellenbergschen Licht-Zeigerwerte. Verh Ges Ökol 22:439-442
55. Seemann JR, Kirschbaum MUF, Sharkey TD, Pearcy RW (1988) Regulation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in Alocasia macrorrhiza in response to step changes in irradiance. Plant Physiol 88:148-152
56. Tinoco-Ojanguren C, Pearcy RW (1993a) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species. I. VPD effects on the transient stomatal response to light-flecks. Oecologia 94:388-394
57. Tinoco-Ojanguren C, Pearcy R (1993b) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species. II. Stomatal versus biochemical limitations during photosynthetic induction. Oecologia 94:395-402
58. Valladares F, Allen MT, Pearcy RW (1997) Photosynthetic response to dynamic light under field conditions in six tropical rainforest shrubs occurring along a light gradient. Oecologia 111:505-514
59. Watling JR, Ball MC, Woodrow IE (1997) The utilization of light-flecks for growth in four Australian rain-forest species. Funct Ecol 11:231-239
60. Whitehead D, Teskey RO (1995) Dynamic response of stomata to changing irradiance in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 15:245-251
61. 2. IV. Two deciduous-forest tree communities. Oecologia 69:454-459
62. 2 at the whole-plant level. Global Change Biol 4:879-893
63. Woodrow IE, Mott KA (1989) Rate limitation of non-steady-state photosynthesis by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in spinach. Aust J Plant Physiol 16:487-500
64. Yanhong T, Hiroshi K, Satoh M, Izumi W (1994) Characteristics of transient photosynthesis in Quercus serrata under lightfleck and constant light regimes. Oecologia 100:463-469
65. Zipperlen SW, Press MC (1997) Photosynthetic induction and stomatal oscillations in relation to the light environment of two dipterocarp rain forest tree species. J Ecol 85:491-503