Tensile tissue stress affects the orientation of cortical microtubules in the epidermis of sunflower hypocotyl

Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 31-44

  Hejnowicz, Zygmunt ^a   Rusin, Aleksandra ^a   Rusin, Tomasz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cortical microtubules; Epidermis; Helicoidal wall; Mechanical stress; Stress anisotropy; Tissue stress

Indexed keywords

HELIANTHUS;

EID: 0033942345     PISSN: 07217595     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003440000005     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baluska F, Hanskrecht M, Barlow PW, Sievers A. 1996. Gravitropism of the primary root of maize: a complex pattern of differential growth in the cortex independent of the microtubular cytoskeleton. Planta 198:310-318.
2. Baskin TI, Meekes HTHM, Liang BM, Sharp RE. 1999. Regulation of growth anisotropy in well-watered and water-stressed maize roots. II. Role of cortical microtubules and cellulose microfibrils. Plant Physiol 119:681-692.
3. Chafe SC, Wardrop AB. 1972. Fine structural observations on the epidermis. I. The epidermal cell wall. Planta 107:269-278.
4. Cosgrove DJ. 1987. Wall relaxation and the driving forces for expansive growth. Plant Physiol 84:561-564.
5. Emons AMC. 1994. Winding threads around plant cells: a geometrical model for microfibril deposition. Plant Cell Environ 17:3-14.
6. Fischer K, Schopfer P. 1997. Interaction of auxin, light, and mechanical stress in orienting microtubules in relation to tropic curvature in the epidermis of maize coleoptiles. Protoplasma 196:108-116.
7. Fisher DD, Cyr RJ. 1998. Extending the microtubule/microfibril paradigm. Plant Physiol 116:1043-1051.
8. Franklin CI, Dixon RA. 1994. Initiation and maintenance of callus and cell suspension cultures. In: Dixon RA, Gonzales RA (eds) Plant cell culture: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, New York, p 1-23.
9. Gertel ET, Green PB. 1977. Cell growth pattern and wall microfibrillar arrangement. Plant Physiol 60:247-254.
10. Green PB. 1963. On mechanism of elongation. In: Locke M (ed) Cytodifferentiation and macromolecular synthesis. Academic Press, New York, pp 203-231.
11. Hejnowicz Z. 1997. Graviresponses in herbs and trees; a major role for the redistribution of tissue and growth stresses. Planta 203:S136-S146.
12. Hejnowicz Z, Sievers A. 1995. Tissue stresses in organs of herbaceous plants II. Determination in three dimensions in the hypocotyl of sunflower. J Exp Bot 46:1045-1053.
13. 'Hejnowicz Z, Sievers A. 1996a. Tissue stresses in organs of herbaceous plants III. Elastic properties of the tissues of sunflower hypocotyl and origin of tissue stresses. J Exp Bot 47:519-528.
14. Hejnowicz Z, Sievers A. 1996b. Acid-induced elongation of Reynoutria stems requires tissue stresses. Physiol Plant 98:345-348.
15. Hodick D, Kutschera U. 1992. Light-induced inhibition of elongation growth in sunflower hypocotyls. Protoplasma 168:7-13.
16. Hush JM, Overall RL. 1991. Electrical and mechanical fields orient cortical microtubules in higher plant tissues. Cell Biol Int Rep 15:551-560.
17. Ivata K, Hogetsu T. 1988. Arrangement of cortical microtubules in Avena coleoptiles and mesocotyls and Pisum epicotyls. Plant Cell Physiol 29:807-815.
18. Jarvis PG. 1992. Self assembly of plant cell walls. Plant Cell Environ 15:1-5.
19. Kropf DL, Williamson RE, Wasteneys GO. 1997. Microtubule orientation and dynamics in elongating characean internodal cells following cytosolic acidification, induction of pH bands, or premature growth arrest. Protoplasma 197:188-198.
20. Lang JM, Eisinger WR, Green PB. 1982. Effects of ethylene on the orientation of microtubules and cellulose microfibrils of pea epicotyl cells with Polylamellate cell walls. Protoplasma 110: 5-14.
21. Laskowski MJ. 1990. Microtubule orientation in pea stem cells: a change in orientation follows the initiation of growth rate decline. Planta 181:44-52.
22. Ledbetter MC, Porter KR. 1963. A "microtubule" in plant cell fine structure. J Cell Biol 19:239-250.
23. Lloyd CW. 1984. Toward a dynamic helical model for the influence of microtubules on wall patterns in plants. Intern Rev Cyt 86:1-51.
24. Marszalek PE, Oberhauser AF, Pang Y-P, Fernandez JM. 1998. Polysaccharide elasticity governed by chair-boat transitions of the glucopyranose ring. Nature 396:661-664.
25. Mayumi K, Shibaoka H. 1996. The cyclic reorientation of cortical microtubules on walls with a crossed Polylamellate structure: effects of plant hormones and an inhibitor of protein kinases on the progression of the cycle. Protoplasma 195:112-122.
26. Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473-497.
27. Neville AC. 1988. A pipe-cleaner molecular model for morphogenesis of helicoidal plant cell walls based on hemicellulose complexity. J Theor Biol 131:243-254.
28. Neville AC, Levy S. 1985. The helicoidal concept in plant cell wall ultrastructure and morphogenesis. In: Brett CT, Hillmann JR (eds) Biochemistry of plant cell walls. Soc Exp Biol Seminar 28:99-124.
29. Nick P. 1999. Signals, motors, morphogenesis - the cytoskeleton in plant development. Plant Biol 1:169-179.
30. Peters WS, Tomos AD. 1996. The history of tissue tension. Ann Bot 77:657-665.
31. Prodham AKMA, Funada R, Ohtani J, Abe H, Fukazawa K. 1995. Orientation of microfibrils and microtubules in developing tension-wood fibres of Japanese ash (Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica). Planta 196:577-585.
32. Richmond P. 1983. Pattern of cellulose microfibril deposition and rearrangement in Nitella: in vivo analysis of a birefringence index. J Applied Polymer Sci 37:107-122.
33. Roland JC, Reis D, Vian B, Satiat-Jeunemaitre, Mosiniak M. 1987. Morphogenesis of plant cell walls at the supramolecular level: internal geometry and versatility of helicoidal expression: Protoplasma 140:75-91.
34. Satiat-Jeunemaitre B. 1984. Experimental modifications of the twisting and rhythmic pattern in the cell walls of maize coleoptile. Biol Cell 51:357-380.
35. Seagull RW. 1991. Role of the cytoskeletal elements in organized wall microfibril deposition. In: Haigler CH, Wiemer PJ (eds) Biosynthesis and biodegradation of cellulose. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 143-163.
36. Shibaoka H. 1993. Regulation by gibberellins of the orientation of cortical microtubules in plant cells. Aust J Plant Physiol 20: 461-470.
37. Vincent JFV, Jeronimidis G. 1991. The mechanical design of fossil plants. In: Rayner JMV, Wootton RJ (eds) Biomechanics and evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 179-194.
38. Williamson RE. 1990. Alignment of cortical microtubules by anisotropic wall stresses. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:601-613.
39. Williamson RE. 1991. Orientation of cortical microtubules in interphase plant cells. Int Rev Cytol 129:135-206.
40. Wymer CL, Wymer SA, Cosgrove DJ, Cyr RJ. 1996. Plant cell growth responds to external forces and the response requires intact microtubules. Plant Physiol 110:425-430.
41. Yuan M, Warn RM, Shaw PJ, Lloyd CW. 1995. Dynamic microtubules under the radial and outer tangential walls of microinjected pea epidermal cells observed by computer reconstruction. Plant J 7:17-23.
42. Zandomeni K, Schopfer P. 1994. Mechanosensory microtubule orientation in the epidermis of maize coleoptiles subjected to bending stress. Protoplasma 182:96-101.