Consumer and instrumental evaluation of Maine wild blueberries for the fresh pack market

Postharvest Biology and Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 221-228

  Donahue, D W ^a   Benoit, P W ^a   Lagasse, B J ^a   Buss, W R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Blueberry; Neural networks; Physical properties; Quality; Sensory analysis; Statistical regression; Vaccinilim angastiofolium

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033940636     PISSN: 09255214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00101-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abbott J.A., Watada A.E., Massie D.R. Sensory and instrument measurement of apple texture. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Science. 109(2):1984;221-228.
2. ASAE S368.3 MAR95. ASAE standards 1995. Standards Engineering Practices Data. 42nd edn:1995;466-470 ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
3. Applegate L.M., Cash J.I. Jr, Mill D. Information technology and tommorrow's manager. Havard Bus. Rev. 66(6):1988;128.
4. Bardot I., Bochereau L., Martin N., Palagos B. Sensory-instrumental correlations by combining data analysis and neural network techniques. Food Qual. Prefer. 5:1994;159-166.
5. Demuth H., Beale M. Neural Network Toolbox for use with Matlab: User Guide, Version 3. 1998;The Math Works Inc, Natick, MA.
6. Donahue D.W., Work T.M. Sensory and textural evaluation of Maine wild blueberries for the fresh pack market. J. Texture Stud. 8(2):1998;305-312.
7. Donahue D.W., deBruyne D.A., Fecteau J.D., Storey J.A., Hazen R.A. Textural evaluation and consumer preference of Maine wild blueberries for the fresh pack market. J. Food Qual. 22(5):1999;545-551.
8. Harker F.R., Stec M.G.H., Hallet I.C., Bennett C.L. Texture of parenchymatous plant tissue: a comparison between tensile and other instrumental and sensory measurements of tissue strength and juiciness. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 11:1997;63-72.
9. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd ed:1999;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
10. Holt J.E., Schoorl D. Mechanical properties and texture of stored apples. J. Texture Studies. 15:1984;377-394.
11. Lippmann, R.P., 1987. An introduction to computing with neural nets. Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. Mag. 4(2), (April 1987), 4-22.
12. Mohsenin N.N. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials: Structure, Physical Characteristics, and Mechanical Properties. 2nd ed. 1986;225-347 Gordon and Breach, New York, NY.
13. Rousset S., Pons B., Pilandron C. Sensory texture profile, grain physico-chemical characteristics and instrumental measurements of cooked rice. J. Texture Studies. 26:1995;119-135.
14. Statistical Analysis System, 1991. SAS Language, Version 6. SAS Institute Incorporated, Cary, NC.
15. Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H., Dickey D.A. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 1997;580-582 McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
16. Thai C.N., Shewfelt R.L. Modeling sensor color quality of tomato and peach: neural networks and statistical regression. Trans. ASAE. 34(3):1991;950-955.
17. Truong V.D., Walter W.M. Jr, Hamann D.D. Relationship between instrumental and sensory parameters of cooked sweetpotato texture. J. Texture Stud. 28(2):1997;163-185.
18. Wilkinson C., Yuksel D. Using artificial neural networks to develop prediction models for sensory-instrumental relationships; an overview. Food Qual. and Prefer. 8(5-6):1997;439-445.