Directional preponderance in pitch circular vection

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 93-98

  Fushiki, H ^a   Takata, S ^a   Yasuda, K ^a   Watanabe, Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOYAMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Optokinetic; Orientation, visual vestibular interaction; Self rotation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM;

ADULT; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; NYSTAGMUS, OPTOKINETIC; ORIENTATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACTION TIME; ROTATION; VESTIBULE;

EID: 0033920165     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. L.R. Young, C. Oman and J.M. Dichgans, Influence of head orientation on visually-induced pitch and roll sensation, Aviat Space Environ Med 46 (1975), 264-268.
2. J.Y. Frigon and D.A. Roll, pitch, longitudinal and yaw vection visually induced by optical flow in flight simulation conditions, Perceptual & Motor Skills 74 (1992), 935-955.
3. D.G.D. Watt and J.P. Landolt, Effects of short-term weight-lessness on roll circularvection. In AGARD Proceedings No. 478: situational awareness in aerospace operations, Advisory Group of Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly Sur Seine, France, 1990.
4. R.S. Kennedy, L.J. Heltinger, D.L. Harm, M. Ordy and W.P. Dunlap, Psychophysical scaling of circular vection (CV) produced by optokinetic (OKN) motion: individual differences and effects of practice, J Vestib Res 6 (1996), 331-341.
5. T.H. Brandt, J. Dichgans and E. Koenig, Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception, Exp Brain Res 16 (1973), 476-491.
6. R.B. Post, Circular vection is independent of stimulus eccen-tricity. Perception 17 (1988), 737-744.
7. G.D. Paige, Senescence of human visual-vestibular interactions: smooth pursuit, optokinetic and vestibular control of eye movements with aging, Exp Brain Res 98 (1994), 355-372.
8. C.L. Darlington and P.F. Smith, Further evidence for gender differences in circularvection, J Vestib Res 8 (1998), 151-153.
9. A. Berthoz, B. Pavard and L.R. Young, Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (Linearvection), Exp Brain Res 23 (1975), 471-189.
10. R. Held, J. Dichgans and J. Bauer, Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation, Vision Res 15 (1975), 357-365.
11. W. Heide, T.P. Blossfeldt, E. Koeningand J. Dichgans, optokinetic nystagmus, self-motion sensation and their aftereffects in patients with long-lasting peripheral visual field defects, Clin Vision Sci 5 (1990), 133-143.
12. H. Fushiki, S. Takata, Y. Nagaki and Y. Watanabe, Circular vection in patients with age-related macular degeneration, J Vestib Res 9 (1999), 287-291.
13. L.R. Young and M. Shelhamer, Microgravity enhances the relative contribution of visually-induced motion sensation, Aviat Space Environ Med 60 (1990), 225-230.
14. C. Mueller, L. Kornilova, G. Wiest and L. Deecke, Visually induced vertical self-motion sensation is altered in microgravity adaptation, J Vestib Res 4 (1994), 161-167.
15. Van den Berg AV and H. Collewijn, Directional asymmetries of human optokinetic nystagmus, Exp Brain Res 70 (1988), 597-604.
16. C.M. Murasugi and I.P. Howard, Up-down asymmetry in human vertical optokinetic nystagmus and afternystagmus: contributions of the central and peripheral retinae, Exp Brain Res 77 (1989), 183-192.
17. Y. Watanabe, H. Shojaku, M. Kobayashi and H. Fushiki, Rotary sensation during optokinetic stimulation, in: Vertigo, nausea, tinnitus and hearing loss in central and peripheral vestibular diseases. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the International Neuro-otologic and Equilibriometric Society, C.F. Claussen, E. Sakata and Itoh A, eds., Elsevier, 1995, 135-138.
18. R.M. Stern, S. Hu, R.B. Anderson, H.W. Leibowitz and K.L. Koch, The effects of fixation and restricted visual field on vection-induced motion sickness, Aviat Space Environ Med 61 (1990), 712-715.
19. F. Lestienne, J. Soechting and A. Berthoz, Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes, Exp Brain Res 28 (1997), 363-384.
20. V. Henn, L.R. Young and C. Finley, Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields, Brain Res 71 (1974), 144-149.
21. W. Waespe and V. Henn, Neuronal activity in the vestibular nuclei of the alert monkey during vestibular and optokinetic stimulation, Exp Brain Res 27 (1977), 523-538.
22. U. Büttner and V. Henn, Circularvection. Psychophysics and single unit recordings in the monkey, Ann NY Acad Sci 374 (1981), 274-283.
23. A. Straube and T. Brandt, Importance of the visual and vestibular cortex for self-motion perception in man (circularvection), Human Neurobiol 6 (1987), 211-218.
24. T. Brandt, P. Bartenstein, A. Janek and M. Dieterich, Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex, Brain 121 (1998), 1749-1758.