Further evidence for gender differences in circularvection

Journal of Vestibular Research: Equilibrium and Orientation

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 151-153

  Darlington, Cynthia L ^a   Smith, Paul F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Circularvection; Gender; Optokinetic; Visual vestibular interaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; VESTIBULAR SYSTEM; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0031967739     PISSN: 09574271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/ves-1998-8203     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Brandt Th, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res 1973;16: 476-91.
2. Paige GD. Senescence of human visual-vestibular interactions: smooth pursuit, optokinetic and vestibular control of eye movements with aging. Exp Brain Res 1994;98:355-72.
3. Kennedy RS, Hettinger LJ, Harm DL, Ordy M, Dunlap WP. Psychophysical scaling of circularvection (CV) produced by optokinetic (OKN) motion: individual differences and effects of practice. J Vestib Res 1996;6:331-41.
4. Kocn KL, Summy-Long J, Bingaman S, Sperry N, Stern RM. Vasopressin and oxytocin responses to illusory self-motion and nausea in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;71:1269-75.