Effects of hunger and predation risk on foraging behavior of graybelly salamanders, Eurycea multiplicata

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1659-1665

  Whitham, Jill ^a,b   Mathis, Alicia ^a  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Banded sculpin; Condition dependent behavior; Cottus carolinae; Eurycea multiplicata; Foraging behavior; Graybelly salamander; Hunger levels; Predator recognition; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIAN; CHEMICAL CUE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HUNGER; PREDATION RISK;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISH; HUNGER; LATENT PERIOD; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PREDATOR; SALAMANDER; STIMULATION;

COTTUS CAROLINAE; EURYCEA MULTIPLICATA; MOXOSTOMA ERYTHRURUM; RANA SPHENOCEPHALA;

EID: 0033914824     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005590913680     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AZEVEDO-RAMOS, C., VAN SLUYS, M., HERO, J.-M., and MAGNUSSON, W. E. 1992. Influence of tadpole movement on predation by odonate naiads. J. Herpetol. 26:335-338.
2. CERRI, R. D., and FRASER, D. F. 1983. Predation and risk in foraging minnows: Balancing conflicting demands. Am. Nat. 121:552-561.
3. CUPP, P. V., JR. 1994. Salamanders avoid chemical cues from predators. Anim. Behav. 48:232-235.
4. GODIN, J.-G. J., and CROSSMAN, S. L. 1994. Hunger-dependent predator inspection and foraging behaviours in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) under predation risk. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:359-366.
5. GODIN, J.-G. J., and SPROUL, C. D. 1988. Risk taking in parasitized sticklebacks under threat of predation: Effects of energetic need and food availability. Can. J. Zool. 66:2360-2367.
6. HEADS, P. A. 1986. The costs of reduced feeding due to predator avoidance: Potential effects on growth and fitness in Ischnura elegans larvae (Odonta: Zygoptera). Ecol. Entomol. 11:369-377.
7. HORAT, P., and SEMLITSCH, R. D. 1994. Effects of predation risk and hunger on the behaviour of two species of tadpoles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34:393-401.
8. JACOBS, A. J., and TAYLOR, D. H. 1992. Chemical communication between Desmognathus quadramaculatus and Desmognathus monticola. J. Herpetol. 26:93-95.
9. JAEGER, R. G., and BARNARD, D. E. 1981. Foraging tactics of a terrestrial salamander: Choice of diet in structurally simple environments. Am. Nat. 117:639-664.
10. KATS, L. B., and DILL, L. M. 1998. The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5:361-394.
11. KREBS, J. R. 1980. Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defense. Ardea 68:83-90.
12. LIMA, S. L. 1987. Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation. J. Theor. Biol. 124:303-316.
13. LIMA, S. L. 1998. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: Recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv. Stud. Behav. 27:215-290.
14. LIMA, S. L., and DILL, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68:619-640.
15. MAGNAHAGEN, C. 1988. Predation risk and foraging in juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (O. keta). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:592-596.
16. MATHIS, A., and LANCASTER, D. 1998. Response of terrestrial salamanders to chemical stimuli from distressed conspecifics. Amphibia-Reptilia 19:330-335.
17. MCNAMARA, J. M., and HOUSTON, A. I. 1986. The common currency for behavioural decisions. Am. Nat. 127:358-378.
18. METCALFE, N. B., HUNTINGFORD, F. A., and THORPE, J. E. 1987. The influence of predation risk on the feeding motivation and foraging strategy of juvenile Atlantic salmon. Anim. Behav. 35:901-911.
19. MILINSKI, M., and HELLER, R. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642-644.
20. MINITAB. 1998. Minitab Statistical Software, Version 12.21. Minitab Inc., Rosemont, Pennsylvania.
21. MOORE, F. R. 1994. Resumption of feeding under risk of predation: Effect of migratory condition. Anim. Behav. 48:975-977.
22. MORGAN, M. J. 1988. The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows. Anim. Behav. 36:1317-1322.
23. MURRAY, D. L., and JENKINS, C. L. 1999. Perceived predation risk as a function of predator dietary cues in terrestrial salamanders. Anim. Behav. 57:33-39.
24. PETRANKA, J. W. 1998. Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
25. PFLIEGER, W. L. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.
26. STAUFFER, H.-P., and SEMLITSCH, R. D. 1993. Effects of visual, chemical, and tactile cues of fish on the behavioural responses of tadpoles. Anim. Behav. 46:355-364.
27. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.