The value of intraoperative intravascular ultrasound for determining stent graft size (excluding abdominal aortic aneurysm) with a modular system

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 311-317

  Nolthenius, Rudolf P Tutein ^a,b   Van Den Berg, Jos C ^a   Moll, Frans L ^a  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b ALBERT SCHWEITZER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL GRAFT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT;

EID: 0033914503     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100169910067     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:491-499.
2. Allen RC, White RA, Zarins CK, et al. What are the characteristics of the ideal endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion? J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:195-202.
3. Balm R, Stokking R, Kaatee R, et al. Computed tomographic angiographic imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:231-237.
4. Diethrich EB. What do we need to know to achieve durable endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? Tex Heart Inst J 1997;24:179-184.
5. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Early experience with the Sydney and EVT prostheses for endoluminal treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2:240-247.
6. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms by the endoluminal method: outcome in the first 100 patients. Med J Aust 1996;18:165:549-551.
7. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: strengths and weaknesses of various prostheses observed in a 4.5-year experience. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:147-151.
8. Parodi JC, Barone A, Piraino R, et al. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: lessons learned. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:102-110.
9. White RA, Donayre CE, Walot I, et al. Modular bifurcation endoprosthesis for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg 1997;226:381-389; discussion 389-391.
10. White GH, Yu W, May J, et al. Three-year experience with the White-Yu endovascular GAD graft for transluminal repair of aortic and iliac aneurysms. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4: 124-136.
11. Armon MP, Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, et al. The anatomy of abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for sizing of endovascular grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:398-402.
12. Bayle O, Branchereau A, Rosset E, et al. Morphologic assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms by spiral computed tomographic scanning. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:238-246.
13. Beebe HG, Jackson T, Pigott JP. Aortic aneurysm morphology for planning endovascular aortic grafts: limitations of conventional imaging methods. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2: 139-148.
14. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. A prospective study of changes in morphology and dimensions of abdominal aortic aneurysms following endoluminal repair: a preliminary report. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2:343-347.
15. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Restdts of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms are dependent on aneurysm morphology. Ann Vasc Surg 1996;10:254-261.
16. White RA, Donayre CE, Walot I, et al. Aortic aneurysm morphology for planning endovascular procedures. Tex Heart Inst J 1997;24:160-166.
17. Buonocore E, Meaney RF, Borkowski GP, et al. Digital subtraction angiography of the abdominal aorta and renal arteries. Comparison with conventional aortography. Radiology 1981;139:281-286.
18. Beebe HG. Imaging modalities for aortic endografting. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:111-123.
19. Woodburn KR, May J, White GH. Endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 1998;85:435-443.
20. Diethrich EB. Will contrast aortography become obsolete in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for endovascular exclusion? J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:5-12.
21. Anderson JC, Baltaxe HA, Wolf GL. Inability to show clot: one limitation of ultrasonography of the abdominal aorta. Radiology 1979;132:693-696.
22. Lee KR, Walls WJ, Martin NL, et al. A practical approach to the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 1975; 78:195-201.
23. Ouriel K, Green RM, Donayre C, et al. An evaluation of new methods of expressing aortic aneurysm size: relationship to rupture. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:12-18; discussion 19-20.
24. Jaakkola P, Hippelainen M, Farin P, et al. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:230-237.
25. Rubin GD, Paik DS, Johnston PC, et al. Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 1998;206: 823-829.
26. Dorffner R, Thurnher S, Youssefzadeh S, et al. Spiral CT angiography in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms after stent grafting: value of maximum intensity projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:472-477.
27. Balm R, Kaatee R, Blankensteijn JD, et al. CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms after transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:182-188.
28. Davis CP, Ladd ME, Romanowski BJ, et al. Human aorta: preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets. Radiology 1996;199:37-40.
29. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT, et al. Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stentgraft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:329-331.
30. Castrucci M, Mellone R, Vanzulli A, et al. Mural thrombi in abdominal aortic aneurysms: MR imaging characterization-useful before endovascular treatment? Radiology 1995;197: 135-139.
31. Fox AD, Whiteley MS, Murphy P, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms with measurements obtained by other imaging techniques and intraoperalive measurements: possible implications for endovascular grafting. J Vasc Surg 1996;24: 632-638.
32. Thurnher SA, Dorffner R, Thurnher MM, et al. Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stentgraft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997;205:341-352.
33. Gussenhoven EJ, van der Lugt A, Pasterkamp G, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of outcome after peripheral balloon angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10: 279-288.
34. Gussenhoven EJ, Geselschap JH, van Lankeren W, et al. Remodeling of atherosclerotic coronary arteries assessed with intravascular ultrasound in vitro. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:699-702.
35. van Sambeek MR, Qureshi A, van Lankeren W, et al. Discrepancy between stent deployment and balloon size used assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;15:57-61.
36. White RA, Donayre CE, Kopchok GE, et al. Vascular imaging before, during, and after endovascular repair. World J Surg 1996;20:622-629.
37. White RA, Donayre CE, Kopchok GE, et al. Utility of intravascular ultrasound in peripheral interventions. Tex Heart Inst J 1997;24:28-34.
38. Vogt KC, Brunkwall J, Malina M, et al. The use of intravascular ultrasound as control procedure lor the deployment of endovascular stented grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13:592-596.
39. White RA, Donayre C, Kopchok G, et al. Intravascular ultrasound: the ultimate tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm assessment and endovascular graft delivery. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:45-55.
40. Cavaye DM, Diethrich EB, Santiago OJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: an essential component of angioplasty assessment and vascular stent deployment. Int Angiol 1993; 12:214-220.
41. Froelich JJ, Hoppe M, Nahrstedt C, et al. The precise determination of vascular lumen and stent diameters: correlation among calibrated angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and pressure-fixed specimens. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997;20:452-456.
42. van Essen JA, van der Lugt, Gussenhoven EJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasonography allows accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an in vitro validation study. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:347-353.
43. Verbin C, Scoccianti M, Kopchok G, et al. Comparison of the utility of CT scans and intravascular ultrasound in endovascular aortic grafting. Ann Vasc Surg 1995;9:434-440.
44. Evans JL, Ng KH, Vonesh MJ, et al. Arterial imaging with a new forward-viewing intravascular ultrasound catheter, I. Initial studies. Circulation 1994;89:712-717.
45. Reid DB, Douglas M, Diethrich EB. The clinical value of three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound imaging. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2:356-364.
46. Evans M. Experimental animal study of cardiovascular concepts endoprostheses in CVC Research Laboratory. Internal communication, Medtronic AneuRx, 1993.
47. Blum U, Langer M, Spillner G, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: preliminary technical and clinical results with transfemoral placement of endovascular self-expanding stentgrafts. Radiology 1996;198:25-31.
48. Marin ML, Veith FJ, Cynamon J, et al. Initial experience with transluminally placed endovascular grafts for the treatment of complex vascular lesions. Ann Surg 1995;222:449-465; discussion 465-469.
49. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Surgical management of complications following endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:51-59.
50. Parodi JC. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms and other arterial lesions. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:549-555; discussion 556-557.