Sensitization to cocaine's reinforcing effects produced by various cocaine pretreatment regimens in rats

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 765-770

  Schenk, Susan ^a   Partridge, Brian ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cocaine; Self administration; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DRUG SENSITIZATION; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SENSITIZATION;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF ADMINISTRATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033872089     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00273-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Badiani A., Browman K.E., Robinson T.E. Influence of novel verses home environments on sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Brain Res. 674:1995;291-298.
2. Browman K.E., Badiani A., Robinson T.E. The influence of environment on the induction of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of intravenous cocaine in rats is dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 137:1998;90-98.
3. Carey R.J., Gui J. Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization. What is the relationship? Behav. Brain Res. 92:1998;67-76.
4. Carroll M.E., Lac S.T. Acquisition of IV amphetamine and cocaine self-administration in rats as a function of dose. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 129:1997;206-214.
5. Childress A.R., Mozley P.D., McElgin W., Fitzgerald J., Reivich M., O'Brien C.P. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am. J. Psychiatry. 156:1999;11-18.
6. DeWitt H., Wise R.A. Blockade of cocaine reinforcement in rats with the dopamine receptor blocker pimozide, but not with the noradrenergic blockers phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine. Can. J. Psychol. 31:1997;195.
7. DiChiara G. The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of motivation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 38:1995;345-348.
8. Ettenberg A., Geist T.D. Animal model for investigating the anxiogenic effects of self-administered cocaine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 103:1991;455-461.
9. Grant S., London E.D., Newlin D.B., Villemagne V.L., Liu X., Contoreggi C., Phillips R.L., Kimes A.S., Margolin A. Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;12040-12045.
10. Henry D.J., Hu X.T., White F.J. Adaptations in the mesoaccumbens dopamine system resulting from repeated administration of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-selective agonists. Relevance to cocaine sensitization Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 140:1998;233-242.
11. Hoffman D.C., Wise R.A. Locomotor-activating effects of the D. 2(agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. 107):1992;277-284.
12. Horger B.A., Shelton K., Schenk S. Preexposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 37:1990;707-711.
13. Horger B.A., Giles M.K., Schenk S. Preexposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 107:1992;271-276.
14. Kalivas P.W., Duffy P., DuMars L.A., Skinner L. Behavioral and neurochemical effects of acute and daily cocaine administration in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 245:1988;485-492.
15. Kalivas P.W., Stewart J. Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induces sensitization to motor activity. Brain Res. Rev. 16:1991;223-244.
16. Kelley P.H., Iversen S.D. Selective 6-OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons; Abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 40:1976;45-56.
17. Lett B.W. Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 98:1989;357-362.
18. Mattingly B.A., Gotsick J.E. Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav. Neurosci. 103:1989;1311-1317.
19. Mcintosh A.R., Gonzalez-Lima F. Large-scale functional connectivity in associative learning. Interrelations of the rat auditory, visual, and limbic systems J. Neurophysiol. 80:1998;3148-3162.
20. Mendrek A., Blaha C.D., Phillips A.G. Preexposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio paradigm. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 135:1998;416-422.
21. Miczek K.A., Mutschler N.H. Activational effects of social stress on IV cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 128:1996;256-264.
22. Mitchell J.A., Hall G. Learning in rats with caudate-putamen lesions. Unimpaired classical conditioning and beneficial effects of redundant stimulus cues on instrumental and spatial learning deficits Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;504-514.
23. Partridge B., Schenk S. Context-independent sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of cocaine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 63:1999;543-548.
24. Phillips G.D., Morutto S.L. Post-session sulpiride infusions within the perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamus enhance consolidation of associative learning. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 140:1998;354-364.
25. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science. 245:1989;1511.
26. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Stress and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res. 514:1990;22-26.
27. Pierre P.J., Vezina P. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine. The contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 129:1997;277-284.
28. Post R.M., Lockfield A., Squillace K.M., Contel N.R. Drug-environment interaction. Context dependency of cocaine induced behavioral sensitization Life Sci. 28:1991;755-760.
29. Post R.M., Weiss S., Pert A. The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacol. Bull. 23:1987;423-429.
30. Post R.M., Weiss S.R., Fontana D., Pert A. Conditioned sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant cocaine. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 654:1992;386-399.
31. Ritz M., Lamb R.J., Goldberg S.R., Kuhar M.J. Cocaine self-administration appears to be mediated by dopamine uptake inhibition. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 12:1988;233-239.
32. Ritz M., Lamb R.J., Goldberg S.R., Kuhar M.J. Cocaine receptors in dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science. 237:1987;1219-1223.
33. Robinson T.E., Becker J.B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration. A review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis Brain Res. Rev. 11:1986;157-198.
34. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving. An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction Brain Res. 18:1993;247-291.
35. Robinson T.E., Browman K.E., Crombag H.S., Badiani A. Modulation of the induction or expression of psychostimulant sensitization by the circumstances surrounding drug administration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22:1998;347-354.
36. Schenk S., Horger B.A., Peltier R., Shelton K. Supersensitivity to the reinforcing effects of cocaine following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex in rats. Brain Res. 543:1991;227-235.
37. Schenk S., Valdez A., McNamara C., House D.T., Higley D., Bankson M.G., Gibbs S., Horger B.A. Development and expression of sensitization to cocaine's reinforcing properties. role of NMDA receptors Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 111:1993;332-338.
38. Schenk S., Partridge B. Sensitization and tolerance in psychostimulant self-administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57:1997;543-550.
39. Schenk S., Davidson E.S. Stimulant preexposure sensitizes rats and humans to the rewarding effects of cocaine. NIDA Res. Monogr. 169:1998;56-82.
40. Shippenberg T.S., Heidbreder Ch. Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacological and temporal characteristics J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 273:1995;808-815.
41. Shippenberg T.S., Le Flour A., Thompson Ch. K-opioid agonists prevent sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 276:1996;545-554.
42. Shippenberg T.S., LeFevour A., Thompson A.C. Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of morphine and cocaine. differential effects of the k-opioid receptor agonist U69593 Eur. J. Pharmacol. 345:1998;27-34.
43. Spencer D.G., Emmett-Oglesby M.W. Parallel processing strategies in the application of microcomputers to the behavioral laboratory. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 17:1985;294-300.
44. Szechtman H., Dai H., Mustafa S., Einat H., Sullivan R.M. Effects of dose and interdose interval on locomotor sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinperole. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 48:1994;921-928.
45. Szumlinski K.K., Allan M., Talangbayan H., Tracey A., Szechtman H. Locomotor sensitization to quinperole. Environment-modulated increase in efficacy and context-dependent increase in potency Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 134:1997;193-200.
46. Whitelaw R.B., Markou A., Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. Excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala impair the acquisition of cocaine-seeking behaviour under a second-order schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 127:1996;213-224.
47. Wise R.A., Bozarth M.A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;469-492.
48. Woolverton W.L., Cervo L., Johanson C.E. Effects of repeated methamphetamine administration on methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 21:1984;737-741.