Patients' perception of pain after total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 590-596

  Barrack, Robert L ^a,b   Paprosky, Wayne ^a,b   Butler, R Allen ^a,b   Palafox, Andrew ^a,b   Szuszczewicz, Ed ^a,b   Myers, Leann ^a,b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Femoral stem; Pain drawing; THA; Thigh pain

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; CHROMIUM; COBALT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033857293     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.6634     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Total hip replacement using the APR system
2. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components
3. Porous-coated hip replacement: The factors governing bone in-growth, stress shielding and clinical results
4. Early failures among 14,009 cemented and 1,326 uncemented prostheses for primary coarthrosis: The Norwegian arthroplasty register, 1987-1992
5. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement
6. Direct comparison between bilaterally implanted cemented and uncemented total hip replacement in 6 patients
7. A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cemented in a total hip arthroplasty
8. Clinical and radiographic analysis of the uncemented LSF total hip arthroplasty
9. Pain in the thigh following total hip replacement with a porous-coated anatomic prosthesis of osteoarthrosis
10. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series
11. Thigh pain and cementless hip arthroplasty - Annoyance or ill omen?
12. A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement
13. Clinical and roentgenographic evaluation of noncemented porous-coated anatomic medullary locking (AML) and porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip arthroplasties
14. Comparison of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties
15. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted with cement
16. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty
17. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: A comparative study of equivalent patient populations
18. Cemented versus non-cemented total hips: A preliminary report
19. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: A critical review
20. Porous coated anatomic cementless total hip replacement - Clinical and roentgenographic results with minimum two-year follow-up
21. Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size
22. Numerical grading of clinical results
23. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mod arthroplasty - An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation
24. An analysis of a retrieved prodigy femoral prosthesis
25. Long-term results of the use of the anatomic medullary locking prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty
26. Point-counterpoint: Optimal fixation for femoral components. Cemented or cementless
27. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty
28. Thigh pain in total hip arthroplasty with cemented femoral components
29. Evaluation of bone ingrowth and proximally and extensively porous-coated AML prostheses retrieved at autopsy
30. Demographic biases found in scoring instruments of total hip arthroplasty
31. Defining the efficacy and limits of cementless femoral fixation: The Taperloc system
32. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking prostheses