Enteral versus parenteral nutrition

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 87, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1121-1122

  MacFie, J ^a  

^a SCARBOROUGH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALORIC INTAKE; ENTERIC FEEDING; FOOD INTAKE; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

DECISION MAKING; ENTERAL NUTRITION; HUMANS; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 0033831927     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01563.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. The uses and limitations of nutritional support
2. The adequacy of enteral nutrition
3. Enteral nutrition
4. Lesson of the week: Deaths after delayed recognition of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube migration
5. Gut origin of sepsis: A prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation, gastric microflora, and septic morbidity
6. Grains or veins: Is enteral nutrition really better than parenteral nutrition? A look at the evidence
7. Preoperative total parenteral nutrition is not associated with mucosal atrophy or bacterial translocation in humans
8. Total parenteral nutrition-induced changes in gut mucosal function: Atrophy alone is not the issue
9. Alterations in intestinal barrier function do not predispose to translocation of enteric bacteria in gastroenterologic patients
10. Benefits and complications of parenteral nutritional support