The molecular basis for pyrimidine-selective DNA binding: Analysis of calicheamicin oligosaccharide derivatives by capillary electrophoresis

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 122, Issue 35, 2000, Pages 8413-8420

  Biswas, Kaustav ^a   Pal, Santona ^a   Carbeck, Jeffrey D ^b   Kahne, Daniel ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALICHEAMICIN; CALICHEAMICIN DERIVATIVE; DNA; IODINE; OLIGOSACCHARIDE; PYRIMIDINE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS; DNA BINDING; DRUG STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR PROBE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; RIGIDITY;

EID: 0033828499     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja000519v     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. (a) Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Sievers, E. L.; Appelbaum, F. R.; Speilberger, R. T.; Forman, S. J.; Flowers, D.; Smith, F. O.; Shannon-Dorcy, K.; Berger, M. S. Blood 1999, 93, 3678-3684.
2. (b) Ovarian Cancer: Gillespie, A. M.; Broadhead, T. J.; Chan, S. Y.; Owen, J.; Farnsworth, A.; Sopwith, M.; Coleman, R. E.; Online Abstracts of the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; see: http://asco.infostreet.com/prof/me/html/98abstracts/ibt/m_1686.htm.
3. (a) Zein, N.; Sinha, A. M.; McGahren, W. J.; Ellestad, G. A. Science 1988, 240, 1198-1201.
4. (b) Zein, N.; Poncin, M.; Nilakantan, R.; Ellestad, G. A. Science 1989, 244, 697-699.
5. (c) Lee, M. D.; Ellestad, G. A.; Borders, D. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 235-243.
6. (d) Nicolaou, K. C.; Dai, W.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1387-1416.
7. (a) Kahne, D. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 7-12.
8. (b) Kahne, D.; Silva, D.; Walker, S. In Bioorganic Chemistry: Carbohydrates; Hecht, S. M., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, 1999; pp 174-197.
9. Geierstanger, B. H.; Wemmer, D. E. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1995, 24, 463-493.
10. Dickerson, R. E. Methods Enzymol. 1992, 211, 67-111.
11. Hawley, R. C.; Kiessling, L. L.; Schreiber, S. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 1105-1109.
12. Li, T.; Zeng, Z.; Estevez, V. A.; Baldenius, K. U.; Nicolaou, K. C.; Joyce, G. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3709-3715.
13. (a) Walker, S.; Murnick, J.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7954-7961.
14. (b) Walker, S. L.; Andreotti, A. H.; Kahne, D. E. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1351-1360.
15. (a) Paloma, L. G.; Smith, J. A.; Chazin, W. J.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3697-3708.
16. (b) Ikemoto, N.; Kumar, R. A.; Ling, T. T.; Ellestad, G. A.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Patel, D. J. Proc. Natl: Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 10506-10510.
17. (c) Kumar, R. A.; Ikemoto, N.; Patel, D. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 265, 187-201.
18. Bailly, C.; Waring, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7311-7316.
19. Chatterjee, M.; Mah, S. C.; Tullius, T. D.; Townsend, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8074-8082.
20. Kalben, A.; Pal, S.; Andreotti, A. H.; Walker, S.; Gange, D.; Biswas, K.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8403-8412.
21. (a) Mah, S. C.; Price, M. A.; Townsend, C. A.; Tullius, T. D. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1361-1378.
22. (b) Kuduvalli, P. N.; Townsend, C. A.; Tullius, T. D. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 3899-3906.
23. (c) Yu, L.; Salzberg, A. A.; Dedon, P. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1995, 3, 729-741.
24. Recent work by Danishefsky and Crothers also support this model. See: Sissi, C.; Aiyar, J.; Boyer, S.; Depew, K.; Danishefsky, S.; Crothers, D. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 10643-10648.
25. (a) Drak, J.; Iwasawa, N.; Danishefsky, S.; Crothers, D. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88, 7464-7468.
26. (b) Aiyar, J.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Crothers, D. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7552-7554.
27. (c) Nicolaou, K. C.; Tsay, S.-C; Suzuki, T.; Joyce, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7555-7557.
28. (d) Sugiura, Y.; Uesawa, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Kuwahara, J.; Golik, J.; Doyle, T. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1989, 86, 7672-7676.
29. Iodine and the ethyl group have similar values in Taft's steric scale (see: March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1992; p 285, and references therein). Sulfur is isosteric with methylene. For example, see Mislow's determination of the absolute configuration of α-lipoic acid (Mislow, K. and Meluch, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 5920-5923) and the formation of similar polymorphic crystal forms of D,L-methionine and D,L-norleucine (see Dalhus, B. and Gorbitz, C. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C (Cs. Str. Comm.) 1999, 55, 1105-1112, and references therein). Therefore, the replacement of iodine by the methylthio functionality is expected to result in the presentation of a comparable steric surface on the aromatic ring.
30. Iodine and the ethyl group have similar values in Taft's steric scale (see: March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1992; p 285, and references therein). Sulfur is isosteric with methylene. For example, see Mislow's determination of the absolute configuration of α-lipoic acid (Mislow, K. and Meluch, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 5920-5923) and the formation of similar polymorphic crystal forms of D,L-methionine and D,L-norleucine (see Dalhus, B. and Gorbitz, C. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C (Cs. Str. Comm.) 1999, 55, 1105-1112, and references therein). Therefore, the replacement of iodine by the methylthio functionality is expected to result in the presentation of a comparable steric surface on the aromatic ring.
31. Iodine and the ethyl group have similar values in Taft's steric scale (see: March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1992; p 285, and references therein). Sulfur is isosteric with methylene. For example, see Mislow's determination of the absolute configuration of α-lipoic acid (Mislow, K. and Meluch, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 5920-5923) and the formation of similar polymorphic crystal forms of D,L-methionine and D,L-norleucine (see Dalhus, B. and Gorbitz, C. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C (Cs. Str. Comm.) 1999, 55, 1105-1112, and references therein). Therefore, the replacement of iodine by the methylthio functionality is expected to result in the presentation of a comparable steric surface on the aromatic ring.
32. The dipolar interaction between the exocyclic nitrogen of guanine and the iodine should be significantly stronger than that between the external methyl group of the methylthio functionality and the guanine amino group. The internal sulfur atom is not expected to contact the DNA due to steric hindrance from the external methyl group and the two ortho-functionalities on the aromatic ring (see Figure 1).
33. Kim, S.-H.; Augeri, D.; Yang, D.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1766-1775.
34. Barnes, J. H.; Borrows, E. T.; Elks, J.; Hems, B. A.; Long, A. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1950, 2824-2833.
35. Trost, B. M.; Caldwell, C. G.; Murayama, E.; Heissler, D. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3252-3265.
36. Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651-1660.
37. Cheung, Y.-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 3809-3810.
38. Pal, S. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1997.
39. Krishnamurthy, G.; Ding, W.-D.; O'Brien, L.; Ellestad, G. A. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 1341-1349.
40. (a) Colton, I. J.; Carbeck, J. D.; Rao, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Electrophoresis 1998, 19, 367-382.
41. (b) Heegaard, N. H. H.; Nilsson, S.; Guzman, N. A. J. Chromatogr. B 1998, 715, 29-54.
42. (a) Hamdan, I. I.; Skellern, G. G.; Waigh, R. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 3053-3058.
43. (b) Battersby, T. R.; Ang, D. N.; Burgstaller, P.; Jurczyk, S. C.; Bowser, M. T.; Buchanan, D. D.; Kennedy, R. T.; Benner, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9781-9789.
44. Li, C.; Martin, L. M. Anal. Biochem. 1998, 263, 72-78.
45. Scatchard, G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1949, 51, 600-604. The relative linearity of the data from the binding isotherm, representing the formation of a 1:1 complex, validates the use of a simple Scatchard analysis, rather than a neighbor exclusion model (McGhee, J. D.; von Hippel, P. H. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 86, 469-489). We thank a reviewer for this observation.
46. Scatchard, G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1949, 51, 600-604. The relative linearity of the data from the binding isotherm, representing the formation of a 1:1 complex, validates the use of a simple Scatchard analysis, rather than a neighbor exclusion model (McGhee, J. D.; von Hippel, P. H. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 86, 469-489). We thank a reviewer for this observation.
47. Rehfuss, R.; Goodisman, J.; Dabrowiak, J. C. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 777-781.
48. a's at 298 K.
49. Kim, J. L.; Burley, S. K. Struct. Biol. 1994, 1, 638-653.
50. von Hippel, P. H.; Berg, O. G. Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions; Saenger, W., Heinemann, U., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, Fl, 1989; pp 1-18.
51. Walker, S.; Valentine, K. G.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6428-6429.
52. Walker, S.; Yang, D.; Kahne, D.; Gange, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4716-4717.
53. Walker, S.; Gange, D.; Gupta, V.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3197-3206.
54. Oki, M. Top. Stereochem. 1983, 14, 1-81.
55. Borer, P. N. CRC Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Nucleic Acids, Vol. I; Fasman, G. D., Ed.; CRC Press: Cleveland, 1975; p 589.
56. Mammen, M.; Colton, I. J.; Carbeck, J. D.; Bradley, R.; Whitesides, G. W. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2165-2170.