How should we be teaching our undergraduates?

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 662-667

  Dacre, Jane E ^a   Fox, Robin ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RHEUMATOLOGY; TEACHING;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; HUMANS; LEARNING; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; RHEUMATOLOGY; TEACHING;

EID: 0033827974     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ard.59.9.662     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. 1 Doherty M, Dawes P. Student teaching, guidelines in the undergraduate curriculum in the UK. Br J Rheumatol 1992;31:409-12.
2. 2 European Board of Rheumatology, UEMS. Core Curriculum available on the internet .
3. 3 General Medical Council Education Committee. Tomorrow's doctors. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council, 1993.
4. 4 Report of the National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education. Higher education in the learning society. London: Stationery Office, 1997.
5. 5 Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ 1999;318:1280-3.
6. 6 Newble DI, Entwistle NJ. Learning styles and approaches: implication for medical education. Med Educ 1986;20: 162-75.
7. 7 Coles C. How students learn. The process of learning. In: Jolly B, Rees L, eds. Medical education in the millenium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998:63-82.
8. 8 McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC, Sproston KA. Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: prospective study. BMJ 1998;316:345-50.
9. 9 Newble DI, Hejka EJ, Whelan G. The approaches to learning of specialist physicians. Med Educ 1990;24:101-9.
10. 10 Newble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994:165-71.
11. 11 Maslow AH. Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
12. 12 Newble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994:38-53.
13. 13 Allery LA. Dealing with challenging group members. In: Two sides of AL: teaching reflective practice. University of Wales College of Medicine School of Postgraduate Medical & Dental Education, 1998: 4.
14. 14 Dolmans D, Schmidt H. The advantages of problem-based curricula. Postgrad Med 1996;72:535-8.
15. 15 Schmidt HG. Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ 1983;17:11-16.
16. 16 Bouhuijs PAJ. The teacher and self-directed learners. In: Jolly B, Rees L, eds. Medical education in the millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998:192-8.
17. 17 Vernon DTA, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993;68:550-63.
18. 18 Finucane PM, Johnson SM, Prideaux DJ. Problem-based learning: its rationale and efficacy. Med J Aust 1998;168: 445-8.
19. 19 Albanese MA, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1990;65:52-81.
20. 20 Berkson L. Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met? Acad Med 1993;68(suppl):79-88S.
21. 21 Snadden D, Thomas M. The use of portfolio learning in medical education. Medical Teacher 1998;20:192-9.
22. 22 Challis M, Mathers NJ, Howe AC, Field NJ. Portfolio-based learning: continuing medical education for general practitioners - a mid-point evaluation. Med Educ 1997;31: 22-6.
23. 23 Harden RM, Davis MH, Crosby JR. The new Dundee medical curriculum: a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. Med Educ 1997;31:264-71.
24. 24 Holsgrove GJ, Lanphear JH, Ledingham IMcA. Study guides: an essential student learning tool in an integrated curriculum. Medical Teacher 1998;20:99-103.
25. 25 Fox R, Dacre J, Ingham-Clark C, Scotland A. A comparison of the ability of pre-registration house officers (PRHOs) and medical undergraduates to examine the locomotor system [abstract]. EULAR Congress Abstracts 1999:85 (abstract 322).
26. 26 Doherty M, Dacre J, Dieppe P, Snaith M. The "GALS" locomotor screen. Ann Rheum Dis 1992;51:1165-9.
27. 27 Plant MJ, Linton S, Dodd E, Jones PW, Dawes PT. The GALS locomotor screen and disability. Ann Rheum Dis 1993;52:886-90.
28. 28 Fox R, Martin J, McLure C, Dacre J. Can students learn a locomotor screening examination (the GALS screen)? A comparative study [abstract]. EULAR Congress Abstracts 1999:84 (abstract 321).
29. 29 Wykurz G. Patients in medical education: from passive participants to active partners. Med Educ 1999;33:634-5.
30. 30 Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ 1964;39:802-5.
31. 31 Stillman PL, Regan M, Philbin M, Haley H. Results of a survey on the use of standardised patients to teach and evaluate clinical skills. Acad Med 1990;65:288-92.
32. 32 Gruppen LD, Branch VK, Laing T. The use of trained patient educators with rheumatoid arthritis to teach medical students. Arthritis Care Research 1996;9:302-8.
33. 33 Hendry GD, Schrieber L, Bryce D. Patients teach students: partners in arthritis education. Med Educ 1999;33:674-7.
34. 34 Branch VK, Lipsky PE. Positive impact of an intervention by arthritis educators on retention of information, confidence, and examination skills of medical students. Arthritis Care Research 1998;11:32-8.
35. 35 Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1997.
36. 36 Comer M, Dacre J. A post-Tomlinson London rheumatology service [abstract]. Br J Rheumatol 1994;33(suppl):108.
37. 37 Dacre J, Nicol M, Holroyd D, Ingram D. The development of a clinical skills centre. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1996;30:318-24.
38. 38 McCrea JD, McCredie MR, McSherry DM, Brooks PM. A controlled evaluation of diagnostic criteria in the development of a rheumatology expert system. Br J Rheumatol 1989;28:13-17.
39. 39 Armstrong R. Interactive rheumatology tutor CD Rom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. (ISBN 0-521-62914-4.)
40. 40 Newble DI, Jaegger K. The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ 1983;17:165-71.